Wednesday, January 21, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #4


Mikhail Bakhtin also discusses monologism which denies the reality, or perspectives, of other beings and cultures. Monologism engages in an extreme certainty, or even solipsism, in which the perceptive experiences of other people and cultures are blanket-rejected as not worthy of consideration or lacking equal-rights. In the most extreme manifestations of monologism there is the attempt to eliminate any dissenting voices because by existing they challenge the controlling narrative. Bakhtin states that monologism: “pretends to be the ultimate word. It closes down the represented world and represented persons.” To restate, monologism is the process of controlling ideologies that seek to eliminate any “other” voices or possibilities. It does not permit creative responses or challenging questions. Dialogism, or perhaps more simply phrased, open playful dialogue, is open to the manifold possibilities and potentials of various other ways of thinking and existing (292-293). The Brazilian educator Paulo Freire considers dialogic learning to be the key to the development of critical consciousness in citizens. Cognitive neuroscientist Adele Diamond in her discussion of the “science of attention” believes that this form of engaged, responsive awareness is the root of healthy development of our brains and body. -- Michael Dean Benton, "Dialogic Cinephilia" (Revised 2022)


-------------------------------------------------------------

With the advent of Late Modernity, the development of technology brought about a dramatic expansion in the possibilities of subjugation.

A first taste of this new scenario was offered by the totalitarian regimes of the Twentieth Century, with their systems of total policing. Yet, as noted by the intellectual Piers Paolo Pasolini, despite their murderous brutality, totalitarian regimes had to settle merely for public displays of obedience to their commands. Their formidable claws were still unable to penetrate the hard kernel of the imagination of their subjects. Things changed, Pasolini continued, with the expansion of new forms of communication, from the first television to the omnipresence of the 'society of the spectacle.' By the last quarter of the century, the dominantsociety were able not only to control external behaviours but also to instill effective forms of self-policing within their subjects. What used to be simple propaganda developed instead into the silent transformation of individual souls, while the laughable spectacle of totalitarian parades turned into the spontaneous processions of self-exploiting workers and consumers.

Thus, in the contemporary age, the pale sun of Late Modernity shines over a two-fold struggle for autonomy: the fight to preserve the possibility of socially deviant behaviours (including one'a active rebellion against perceived injustices), and the challenge to decolonize one's interiority from the socially dominant ideas, assumptions and diktats that pervade every person's sense of self and reality (307-308).

Campagna, Frederico. Otherworldly: Mediterranean Lessons on Escaping History. Bloomsbury, 2025.



----------------------------------------------------------


"Ethics and politics look at both how we should regard and accommodate each other and what kind of things make it possible to, for example, treat each other with respect and what kinds of things don't. That I might view you as "weird" or even "inhuman" (politics) may very much dictate how I then treat you (ethics). When we examine more closely how we think about the world, it turns out that ethics and politics are inseparable." (21) -- Veronique Pin-Fat "How Do We Begin to Think About the World?" Global Politics. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2013: 20 - 38.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Anderson, Ellie and David M. Peña-Guzmán. "Confidence." #147 (November 11, 2025) ["Ellie and David discuss confidence. Modernity has created a crisis of confidence, leading to the demand that we all maximize our confidence. But what is confidence? Is it a personality trait or a relational concept? What causes under- and over-confidence? And is instilling confidence an equity issue? Your hosts think through Charles Pépin’s pillars of confidence, Don A. Moore's formula for calibrating your confidence, and the gendered nature of confidence through bodily expressions."
Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Self-Reliance”
Don A. Moore, Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely
Charles Pépin, Self-Confidence: A Philosophy
Iris Marion Young, “Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body."]

Bassili, Rafaela. "What Kind of Country Is This?: On The Secret Agent." Notebook (November 26, 2025) ["Kleber Mendonça Filho’s paranoid thriller captures the absurdity and horror peculiar to Brazil."]

Bellaigue, Christopher de. "Hype and Fraud in India." The New York Review of Books (January 15, 2026) ["Narendra Modi is pursuing his vision of “developed India” through distorted claims of progress, stolen elections, and anti-Muslim policies."]

Cohn, Lindsay P., et al. "The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil." Lawfare Daily (November 8, 2025) [" Lawfare General Counsel and Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson held a series of conversations with contributors to a special series of articles on “The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil” that Lawfare recently published on its website, in coordination with our friends at Protect Democracy. Participants include: Alex Tausanovitch, Policy Advocate at Protect Democracy; Laura Dickinson, a Professor at George Washington University Law School; Joseph Nunn, Counsel in the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center; Chris Mirasola, an Assistant Professor at the University of Houston Law Center; Mark Nevitt, a Professor at Emory University School of Law; Elaine McCusker, a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; and Lindsay P. Cohn, a Professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval War College. Together, they discussed how and why domestic deployments are being used, the complex set of legal authorities allowing presidents and governors to do so, and what the consequences might be, both for U.S. national security and for U.S. civil-military relations more generally."]

Dabhoiwala, Fara. “What is Free Speech? The History of a Dangerous Idea." LARB Radio Hour (September 5, 2025) ["Kate Wolf speaks with historian Fara Dabhoiwala about his new book, What is Free Speech? The History of a Dangerous Idea. A foundational aspect of the U.S. Constitution, free speech is a relatively recent invention and one rooted less in democratic ideals than first may be clear. Tracking its evolution from the pre-modern age through the Enlightenment to our present day, Dabhoiwala explores how free speech and freedom of the press initially served imperial and corporate interests rather than those of common citizens. His book also examines the counterintuitive ways free speech continues to be an engine for questionable ends today, benefitting tech companies and upholding misogyny and racism. But while it has never been equally distributed, free speech has also resulted, at times, in more freedom rather than less, so what are we to do with this abiding concept and how might we modify its absolutism to better serve those it claims to protect?"]

Doctorow, Cory. "How to Stop “Enshittification” Before It Kills the Internet." Capitalisn't (December 11, 2025) ["There’s a word that’s gained a lot of popularity in the last year: “enshittification”. It refers to a trajectory many see with digital platforms: they initially offer immense value to users, only to systematically degrade that quality over time in order to extract maximum surplus for shareholders. We invited the coiner of this term, science fiction author and activist Cory Doctorow, on the podcast to discuss whether he thinks this decline is an inevitable feature of digital markets or a consequence of specific policy failures. And, most importantly, how he thinks it could be reversed. For Doctorow, "enshittification" is not simply a result of "revealed preferences", where users tolerate worse service because they value the platform, but rather the outcome of a regulatory environment that has permitted the creation of high switching costs and the elimination of competitors. Doctorow also argues that historically, interoperability acted as an engine of dynamism, allowing new entrants to lower the barriers to entry. But current IP frameworks, such as anti-circumvention laws, have been "weaponized" to prevent this, effectively allowing firms to enforce cartels and engage in rent-seeking behavior. Finally, Doctorow offers a critical assessment of the current AI boom, arguing that the sector is creating "reverse centaurs", where human labor is conscripted to correct algorithmic errors, and warns of a potential asset bubble driven by inflated revenue attribution."]

Glick, Jacob. "A Jan. 6 Committee Staff Member on Far-Right Extremism." Lawfare Daily (January 10, 2026) ["The Jan. 6 committee’s final report on the insurrection is over 800 pages, including the footnotes. But there’s still new information coming out about the committee’s findings and its work. Last week, we brought you one of the staffers who worked on the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation into the role of social media in the insurrection. Today, we’re featuring a conversation with Jacob Glick, who served as investigative counsel on the committee and is currently a policy counsel at Georgetown’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection. His work in the Jan. 6 investigation focused on social media and far-right extremism. Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic spoke with Jacob about what the investigation showed him about the forces that led to Jan. 6, how he understands the threat still posed by extremism, and what it was like interviewing Twitter whistleblowers and members of far-right groups who stormed the Capitol."]

Glied, Sherry and Paul Starr. "Health Insurance in America." Throughline (February 27, 2025) ["Millions of Americans depend on their jobs for health insurance. But that's not the case in many other wealthy countries. How did the U.S. end up with a system that's so expensive, yet leaves so many people vulnerable? On this episode, how a temporary solution created an everlasting problem." Guests: Sherry Glied, Dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University; Paul Starr, professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University."]

Godar, Bryn and Carolyn Shapiro. "Can Minnesota Prosecute Ice Agent Jonathan Ross." Lawfare Daily (January 22, 2026) ["Senior Editor Anna Bower spoke with Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of Chicago-Kent College of Law's Institute on the Supreme Court, and Bryna Godar, a Staff Attorney with the at the University of Wisconsin Law School. The discussion covered the state of Minnesota’s jurisdiction to criminally investigate Jonathan Ross, the ICE official who reportedly shot and killed Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7. The conversation also covered obstacles state prosecutors might face in pursuing a potential prosecution and the likelihood that Ross could raise what’s known as 'Supremacy Clause immunity.'"]

Goi, Leonardo. "In Sunny Southland: Paul Thomas Anderson and Thomas Pynchon’s California." Notebook (November 24, 2025) ["By 1970, when Anderson was born in Studio City, Pynchon had quit his gig writing safety articles for Boeing in Seattle and decamped to Los Angeles. He landed in a small apartment in Manhattan Beach, which would appear in his books as the fictional Gordita Beach, a last resort for bums, drifters, punks, and drop-outs determined to steer clear of the straight life. And though his novels have journeyed far and wide—from New York City (V., 1963; Bleeding Edge, 2013) to Chicago (Against the Day, 2006); from the American colonies (Mason & Dixon, 1997) to Europe, Namibia, and Siberia (Gravity’s Rainbow, 1973)—Pynchon has become closely identified with the countercultural hangover that swept through post-Manson California and serves as backdrop for the two texts Anderson would go on to adapt, Inherent Vice (2009) and now Vineland (1990). Novelist and filmmaker are unmistakably smitten with the textures of “sunny Southland,” to use a phrase popularized in the late 1800s by newspaper editor Harrison Gray Otis (who incidentally lifted it from the Confederacy). But they reserve their deepest feeling for its eccentric residents—drifters who straddle the old and the new, who have only just started to realize how the changing of the guard is leaving them behind, who have seen their turf transform to the point they can barely recognize it. Still, neither artist has ever simplistically romanticized that bygone milieu. Their characters fumble as they navigate a world rife with signs, secrets, and conspiracies, a California candied not with “identifiable cit[ies]” but with “grouping[s] of concepts,” where everyone and everything suggests “a hieroglyphic sense of concealed meaning,” per The Crying of Lot 49. That novel came out in April 1966, just a few months before Reagan was elected governor, promising to crack down on the “filthy speech movement” fueled by the student protests at Berkeley and to send “the welfare bums back to work.” The repression and censorship that would dominate Reagan-era California (and eventually all of the United States under his presidency) permeate Vineland and Inherent Vice, in which the actor-turned-politico serves as an omnipresent specter, a kind of daemon ex machina restoring fascism at home and abroad. A mood of chronic paranoia permeates Pynchon’s prose and Anderson’s cinema; what binds them isn’t just some autobiographical affair with Los Angeles but an interest in its sinister side: In the words of Inherent Vice’s Detective Lieutenant “Bigfoot” Bjornsen, “The dark forces that are always there just out of the sunlight.”"]

Jasechko, Scott, et al. "Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally." Nature (January 2024) ["Groundwater resources are vital to ecosystems and livelihoods. Excessive groundwater withdrawals can cause groundwater levels to decline, resulting in seawater intrusion, land subsidence, streamflow depletion and wells running dry. However, the global pace and prevalence of local groundwater declines are poorly constrained, because in situ groundwater levels have not been synthesized at the global scale. Here we analyse in situ groundwater-level trends for 170,000 monitoring wells and 1,693 aquifer systems in countries that encompass approximately 75% of global groundwater withdrawals. We show that rapid groundwater-level declines (>0.5 m year−1) are widespread in the twenty-first century, especially in dry regions with extensive croplands. Critically, we also show that groundwater-level declines have accelerated over the past four decades in 30% of the world’s regional aquifers. This widespread acceleration in groundwater-level deepening highlights an urgent need for more effective measures to address groundwater depletion. Our analysis also reveals specific cases in which depletion trends have reversed following policy changes, managed aquifer recharge and surface-water diversions, demonstrating the potential for depleted aquifer systems to recover."]

Johnson, Allan. "Literature as Occultism." Against Everyone #308 (November 25, 2025) ["... ALLAN JOHNSON Professor of English Literature at University of Surrey, meditation coach, and author of the excellent book, The Sacred Life of Modernist Literature: Immanence, Occultism, and the Making of the Modern World. In that book, Allan states: “The occult has always walked the perilous line between desiring a textual form while resisting the possibility that this form can ever be completely achieved.” One place we find the textual form of the occult is in literature - but I don’t mean that in the way that you think… One of my big frustrations with spiritual influencers who are online, have podcasts, write books and more is that most of them don’t seem to have a good grasp of art, but particularly literature. One reason why is that… well reading books that have occult forms usually take a lot of work. Lots of occultists, magicians, pagans do something like this: they read literature that has magical content and create metaphors and analogies that - all-too conveniently - mirror the lessons of their own esoteric view. And they reach for the easiest usual suspects: Lord of the Rings, Ursula K Le Guin, Star Wars, Paulo Coehlo, etc. But the location of occult and esoteric strength in literature is in its innovative forms and styles - in novelists who wrote in tensions between absence and presence, in multiple innovative structures and voices, in elliptical maneuvers and sentences that change their direction before you finish them. These forms were brought to us most prominently in modernist literature - in James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, Kafka, and more. And it’s also found in poets like TS Elliot, Ezra Pound, and WB Yeats. In the works of modernist writers, the reader’s involvement is demanded to complete the text. They showed us that fiction itself is an occult endeavor - and that reading is a moral technology, maybe one of the only moral technologies. With literature, we meet the other mind, and we co-create reality through symbols, light, and imagination. Writers that ask us to meet them, to do as much in the reading as they do in the writing, bring us so far in our development. They are writers who initiate us with their works. Allan and I talk about all of this in depth. We also talk about Marianne Williamson, Wilhelm Reich, psychoanalysis, and more."]

Juengst, Eric and Daniel Moseley. "Human Enhancement." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (November 13, 2025) ['At first glance there does not seem to be anything philosophically problematic about human enhancement. Activities such as physical fitness routines, wearing eyeglasses, taking music lessons and meditation are routinely utilized for the goal of enhancing human capacities. But there are a cluster of debates in practical ethics, conventionally labeled as “the ethics of human enhancement”, that do raise philosophical questions. These debates include clinicians’ concerns about the limits of legitimate health care, parents’ worries about their reproductive and rearing obligations, and the fairness of competitive practices like sports and war, and the possibility of improving human moral agency itself. They also involve more general questions about distributive justice, science policy, and the public regulation of medical technologies. As usual in practical ethics, an adequate discussion of any specific debate under this heading quickly requires orientation to the science and the social and political practices of specific enhancement interventions. At each turn in these discussions, wide vistas of background philosophical topics also appear for exploration. Rather than providing a detailed account of this whole landscape, we trace a path of core concerns that winds through the current debates on the ethics of human enhancement, as a guide for those interested in exploring further."]

Kafer, Gary. "There is No A.I." Jump Cut #62 (Winter 2023 - 2024) [Review of Kate Crawford, The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021: "The first chapter, “Earth,” examines the mineral mining practices that underpin the construction of computational systems. In chapter two, “Labor,” Crawford examines the forms of workplace surveillance that enervate data systems—including digital pieceworkers, Amazon warehouses, and assembly lines—all of which subject the body to temporal management. "Data” is the subject of the third chapter, which tracks how datasets are built from harvesting personal information and transformed into pattern recognition models. Chapter four, “Classification,” focuses on how that data is used to construct taxonomies of social differences like race and gender within machine learning systems. Next, Crawford turns to “Affect,” recounting the history of scientific attempts to create universal mappings of facial expressions that now subtend the development of emotion detection systems by tech industries. The final chapter turns to the “State” to explore how the private AI industry is taking an active role in reshaping government activities, including policing and warfare. Crawford’s atlas concludes with a discussion of “Power” and the possibility for justice, which is followed by a brief coda exploring the role of “Space” as the ultimate frontier of AI’s imperial project."]

Lembke, Anna. "The Paradox of Pleasure." Hidden Brain (December 8, 2025) ["All of us think we know what addiction looks like. It’s the compulsive consumption of drugs, alcohol, or nicotine. But psychiatrist Anna Lembke argues that our conception of addiction is far too narrow — and that a broader understanding of addiction might help us to understand why so many people are anxious and depressed. This week, we revisit a 2023 episode that remains of the most popular in the history of our show. We’ll explore how and why humans are wired to pursue pleasure, and all the ways the modern world tempts us with addictive substances and behaviors."
Book:
Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence, by Anna Lembke, 2021.
Research:
Changes in the Global Burden of Depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study, by Qingqing Liu et al., Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2020.
Changing World Happiness, by John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, and Shun Wang, World Happiness Report 2019, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019.
Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Epidemiology of DSM-5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Across the Globe, by Ayelet Meron Ruscio et al., JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.
Dopamine-Deficient Mice Are Severely Hypoactive, Adipsic, and Aphagic, by Qun-Yong Zhou and Richard D. Palmiter, Cell, 1995.
Changes in Depression Among Abstinent Alcoholics, by Sandra A. Brown and Marc A. Schuckit, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1988.]

Madoff, Ray. "How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy." This is Hell (November 11, 2025) [" You've got $50 trillion, you should be participating in the system the same as regular working Americans. I think it would be better just to bring the richest Americans into our regular income tax system, the way that all other Americans are in it, rather than coming up with special taxes that we say are specifically geared to the rich." Legal scholar Ray Madoff joins us to discuss her new book from the University of Chicago Press, The Second Estate: How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy.]

Martel, J.F. "Bergson and Weird Philosophy: JF Martel on Time, Subjectivity, and Weirding Realism." Lepht Hand (November 2, 2025) ["Have you ever felt reality glitch, as though the weird was peeking through the cracks of time or the Real? In this episode of LEPHT HAND, JF Martel joins to explore how Henri Bergson’s concept of duration and Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming invite a radically weird subjectivity, one that consumes rhythms, intensities, and habits across time. We discuss how this non-linear conception of time doesn’t just solve problems but also introduces new ones: what does it mean to be a subject in perpetual flux, and is this mysticism, metaphysics, or simply reality hiding behind a theatre of representation?"]

Milanovic, Branko. "Why Economists Should Care About Inequality." Capitalisn't (November 6, 2025) ["Recently, Bethany and Luigi joined economist and wealth inequality expert Branko Milanovic in front of a live audience at the Aspen Ideas Festival to explore how capitalism, democracy, and income inequality interact. Together, the three discussed the pervasiveness of income inequality around the world, its connections with democracy and political stability, if the inequality that really matters is that between countries, and if capitalism and democracy aren't as intricately connected as we thought. As a scholar of China’s economic system, Milanovic discussed how much of the country’s success can even be attributed to capitalism. In the process, the three unpacked if capitalist societies, particularly in the West, are able to address the very inequality they have produced. Are there free-market mechanisms to correct for inequality or does there need to be government intervention? If income inequality poses a dire threat to democracy, what should capitalists do to preserve the institutions that enabled their wealth in the first place?" Branko Milanovic's Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War.]

Nayler, Ray. "The Mountain In The Sea author Ray Nayler - Hugo & Locus award-winner." Sentietism (1/17/26) ["Ray Nayler is a Hugo and Locus Award winning author. Born in Quebec and raised in California, he lived and worked abroad for two decades in Russia, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Vietnam, and Kosovo as a Foreign Service officer, a Peace Corps volunteer, and an international development worker. Ray's first novel, The Mountain in the Sea won the Locus Award. It was a finalist for the Nebula Arthur C. Clarke, the LA Times Ray Bradbury Awards, and was named a London Times science fiction book of the year. Mountain was listed as one of the best science fiction books of all time by Esquire. Ray's novella The Tusks of Extinction won the 2025 Hugo Award, and was a finalist for the Nebula and Locus Awards. Ray's third book, Where the Axe is Buried, was published in April 2025. Ray's short stories have won the Grand Prix de l'Imaginaire, France's highest literary prize for science fiction, the Clarkesworld Readers' poll, the Asimov's Readers' Award, the Bifrost readers' award, and have been nominated for the Theodore Sturgeon Award." Description of The Mountain in the Sea: "Humankind discovers intelligent life in an octopus species with its own language and culture, and sets off a high-stakes global competition to dominate the future. The transnational tech corporation DIANIMA has sealed off the remote Con Dao Archipelago, where a species of octopus has been discovered that may have developed its own language and culture. The marine biologist Dr. Ha Nguyen, who has spent her life researching cephalopod intelligence, will do anything for the chance to study them. She travels to the islands to join DIANIMA’s team: a battle-scarred security agent and the world’s first (and possibly last) android. The octopuses hold the key to unprecedented breakthroughs in extra-human intelligence. As Dr. Nguyen struggles to communicate with the newly discovered species, forces larger than DIANIMA close in to seize the octopuses for themselves. But no one has yet asked the octopuses what they think. Or what they might do about it. A near-future thriller, a meditation on the nature of consciousness, and an eco-logical call to arms, Ray Nayler’s dazzling literary debut The Mountain in the Sea is a mind-blowing dive into the treasure and wreckage of humankind’s legacy."]

Rimbaud, Penny."This is Penny Rimbaud - Part One." Bureau of Lost Culture (October 29, 2025) ["Penny Rimbaud , who has spent more than half a century living the ideals that most of us only talk about, has been described as an activist philosopher, an anarchist, a Zen Buddhist. Though he would likely not recognise those descriptions, he is certainly a poet, a musician, an artist. Born Jeremy John Ratter in 1943, in the late 1960s, together with artist Gee Vaucher, he founded Dial House, an open community and creative refuge in rural Essex. It became both a home and a hub — a living experiment in anarchism, art, and radical living, from which emerged Crass, a band that tore apart punk’s nihilism and replaced it with a fierce moral energy: anti-war, anti-sexism, anti-consumerism — but pro-peace, pro-freedom, and defiantly DIY. Their black-and-white graphics, polemical lyrics, and uncompromising stance made them one of the most influential and challenging acts of their time. When Crass disbanded in 1984, Penny kept on creating, often with Gee. He became a prolific poet, writer, and spoken-word performer, continuing to explore themes of love, pacifism, and spiritual autonomy. Now in his eighties, he still lives and works at Dial House — still questioning authority, still seeking truth through art and language. We range back and forth across Penny's personal history and his thoughts on culture, capitalism, art and the very notion of the self. In his own words: “There is no authority but yourself.”"]

Sy, Lloyd Alimboyao. "What Future for Native Sovereignty?" Public Books (December 3, 2025) ["Five years ago, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which Robert J. Miller (Eastern Shawnee Tribe) and Torey Dolan (Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma) call “likely the most significant Indian law case in well over 100 years.” McGirt affirmed that the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s reservation had never been disestablished, meaning much of eastern Oklahoma remains tribal land. The ruling was celebrated for restoring treaty promises and affirming the legal endurance of tribal sovereignty after centuries of settler encroachment and legal erasure. But it has also ushered in a new era of jurisdictional entanglement: tribal governments were suddenly tasked with exercising criminal jurisdiction over vast swaths of land—including serious felony cases involving Native defendants—without the infrastructure, legal human power, or federal funding necessary to match state prosecutorial capacity. For many tribes, the 2020 decision poses a paradox: sovereignty is reaffirmed, but so too are the burdens of governance under inequitable conditions. That’s why there’s now a major debate in contemporary Indigenous political theory, asking whether sovereignty can still serve as a radical framework, or whether it has already been co-opted by the settler state. Especially in the aftermath of McGirt, a pivotal question for Indigenous political leaders is how to ensure that Indigenous sovereignty does not calcify into the same punitive logics, bureaucratic violence, and elite self-perpetuation that have long defined colonial rule. That question of sovereignty is answered by Jon Hickey’s 2025 novel Big Chief, which considers how Native self-determination navigates the same institutional forms that have long suppressed it. Sovereignty is the problem of Big Chief, but to be sure, Hickey, an enrolled member of the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, refuses to add any simple buzz to that too-often-essentialized word. As its front-cover blurb by David Heska Wanbli Weiden puts it, Big Chief may be “the great Native American political novel,” but in the process it complicates some of the rudimentary political aims of Native peoples today."]

Tobin, Vera, et al. "Spoiler Alert! The Psychology Of Surprise Endings." Hidden Brain (December 3, 2018) ["Writers and filmmakers hoping to hoodwink their fans with plot twists have long known what cognitive scientists know: All of us have blind spots in the way we assess the world. We get distracted. We forget how we know things. We see patterns that aren't there. Because these blind spots are wired into the brain, they act in ways that are predictable — so predictable that storytellers from Sophocles to M. Night Shyamalan have used them to lead us astray. In recent years, some scientists have begun to ask, can stories serve as a kind of brain scan? If a plot twist works by exploiting our biases and mental shortcuts, can observing the mechanics of a good story reveal something important about the contours of the mind?" 'Stories are a kind of magic trick," says cognitive scientist Vera Tobin. "When we dissect them, we can discover very, very reliable aspects of those tricks that turn out to be important clues about the way that people think.'"]

Torres-Gonzalez, Erick. "Za’atar: From Ancient Texts to Modern Conflict." JSTOR Daily (January 7, 2026) ["Some flavors whisper of home, speaking a language rooted in place and memory. For those living in the Levant, the slightly bitter and spicy notes of za’atar have been a symbol of heritage, culture, and resilience for centuries: an indispensable herb in tenth-century cookbooks, the heart of a rich communal harvesting, and the driver of poetic emotion. In these retellings, the plant’s name, transformed through time and languages, has acted as a passport allowing the herb to cross the boundaries of geography, culture, and identity, and with that acquire new meanings: Syrian oregano, Lebanese thyme, biblical hyssop, or, in Linnaean terms, Origanum syriacum. Today, in its dried and ground form, za’atar is best known as the central ingredient in the spice mix that has come to represent Palestinian cuisine worldwide. This herbaceous perennial grows abundantly in the rocky terrain of the Eastern Mediterranean and Sinai Peninsula, standing only about a meter tall, with fuzzy, spear-like leaves growing on hairy, square-shaped stems."]

West, Stephen. "The Frankfurt School (Part 6) - Art As a Tool for Liberation." Philosophize This (December 2, 2017) ["This episode explores why the Frankfurt School—particularly Herbert Marcuse—placed such importance on art and aesthetics in their critique of capitalist society. Rather than dismissing art as irrelevant during times of systemic repression, Marcuse argues that it holds unique power to transform how people see themselves and their place in the world. True liberation, he believes, cannot come through force or impulsive revolution but through a gradual shift in class consciousness, which begins by altering people’s subjectivity—their internalized worldview shaped by culture and media. The culture industry reinforces passive, oversimplified perspectives that prevent deep reflection or awareness of systemic issues. In contrast, great works of art can disrupt these ingrained views and offer glimpses of alternative realities, making them powerful tools for awakening and resistance. However, Marcuse cautions that even art can be co-opted by capitalism, turned into mere commodities unless paired with intentional action—praxis. Liberation, then, requires a balance of theory and praxis, guided by compassion, strategy, and a refusal to reduce others to enemies within the system they never chose.
Further Reading:
The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics by Herbert Marcuse (1978)​
Herbert Marcuse: An Aesthetics of Liberation by Malcolm Miles (2011)​
Art and Liberation: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 4 by Herbert Marcuse (2017)​]

---. "Varieties of Religion Today (Charles Taylor)." Philosophize This! #240 (November 8, 2025) ["Today we talk more about the work of Charles Taylor and his book The Varieties of Religion Today. We look at different answers to a classic question around religious belief. The sociological and structural role that religion plays at any given point in history. Paleo, Neo and Post Durkheim versions of religious society. What religion becomes in the age of authenticity we live in. We paint a picture of the very unique spiritual predicament the modern person has to navigate."]

Zahavi, Dan. "Togetherness." Overthink (November 4, 2025) ["Can we ever be truly alone? In episode 146 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk with philosopher Dan Zahavi about his book, Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology. They discuss how the increase in communication through screens has shifted what it means to be together, the decline of social bonds in political life, and what phenomenological understandings of empathy tell us about being together. How do dyadic relationships such as romantic love and friendship shape our identities? Does there need to be a conception of the self that precedes sociality? What are the different types of "we"?"
Works discussed:
Alison Gopnik, The Philosophical Baby: What Children's Minds Tell Us About Truth, Love, and the Meaning of Life
Ivan Leudar and Philip Thomas, Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity
Sherry Turkle, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other
Gerda Walther, Toward an Ontology of Social Communities
Dan Zahavi, Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology]

On the New Series Star Trek: Star Fleet Academy

I really don't watch TV series these days, not for snobby reasons, I just do not have the time to invest in a bunch of serial entertainment to find something I like. I recently saw a critical post from my friend JT pointing out how Elon Musk and Stephen Miller were shit posting the new Star Trek: Star Fleet Academy series on Twitter (now stupidly known as X). Their targeted attack was the diversity of female body types in the series. They mockingly wondered why there is no ozempic in the future. Miller and Musk seem to believe that people that do not fit their ideal of a proper body should not exist. I/we could go on for a long time about how ignorant and childish these two are - I would say misogynistic, racist, and fascist - but I figured I should check it out first and I recognize their intent is to chase people away from the Star Trek universe because it represents a positive post-scarcity alternative to their selfish worldview. I've been a long time fan of ST, from my earliest days, and frankly I think these two shitposters are currently the worst examples of humanity. I figured on a cold night, I would check it out for myself.
 
After the first episode, I can see why they hate it. It does represent a positive, not perfect, flawed, and trying to do better, vision of the future, in which people of all sorts are involved in working together for a better future. That idea, that we come together to build a better world, for all, together. They hate that. It is what they want to shut down. Probably most terrifying for them, besides the fact that all of the represented characters do not look and act exactly like them, is that the leaders in the first episode own up to their mistakes and try to do better.

A bonus is the casting! Check it out, and piss off Musk and Miller - the first episode is freely available on Youtube





Sunday, January 18, 2026

A Response to 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

In America, we are suffering through major cultural reverberatory concussions (the long-term denialism of our irrational 9/11 revenge on a global scale and the so-far, short-term paranoiac pandemic delusions) that have stifled our ability to address our perceived traumas or mobilize our vast resources to make life better for the population-at-large.

In the film 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple we see a similar cultural condition unleashed as a result of a viral infection that creates violent rage in a large part of the population (and we see what the ragers see in this film - which is a big narrative twist). The two responses portrayed in the film could not be any more different. Dr. Kelson seeks meaning in science and creativity (the titular Bone Temple). He feels empathy for others, including the most degraded individuals like the massive and violent rager that he names Samson. On the other hand we have Jimmy Crystal and his cult of Jimmies. They make sense through extreme hatred and violence against others. They glorify in pain and anguish, especially that of their victims. Jimmy Crystal, who resembles the detested British entertainer/sexual predator Jimmy Saville (but easily brings to mind for this American, Donald Trump), couches his actions in a childish fantasy of his being the son of a dark deity, and creates a religious narrative that this torture and murder is a form of glorification of his father.

I don't want to go beyond this for those that have not seen the film. I could write for hours on what I think of the film. It is subtle in its explorations through genre/mythic structures of these ideas and it is not polemical/didactic at all. Nia DaCosta, Alex Garland, and Danny Boyle have created a unique world and film. A rare sequel that exceeds the previous films.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #3

 "Thinking, as an activity, does not belong to some rarefied world of professional philosophers. 'Intellectual,' she said, was a hateful word. She held that everyone was capable of engaging in self-reflective critical thinking, and that doing so was necessary if one is to resist the tide of ideological thought and claim personal responsibility in the face of fascism. (10)" - Hill, Samantha Rose. Hannah Arendt. Reaktion Books, 2021.

------------------------------------------------------------

    Just as every culture has its own signs to represent the same mathematical numbers, so too it has its unique way of representing the blend of the sacred and the profane, visible and invisible, that underpins reality. A Greek nymph, an Egyptian god and a Persian angel are just different manifestations of the same infinite essence. Hence the ease with which the Romans welcomed foreign divinities into their pantheon and combined their mythological discourses. 

    This intuition which constitutes the core of the Mediterranean imagination, found a masterful expression in the philosophical system of Neoplatonism. Founded in the third century by the Egyptian philosopher Plotinus, Neoplatonism treated reality as a complex realm composed of multiple dimensions. Only a fraction of it can be experienced through the senses and classified by human languages; beyond this fragment, an infinite dimension yawns, surpassing any sense of concept. This arcane dimension sustains the existence of everything that is manifest in the world, yet humans can refer to it only through imprecise and insufficient terms, such as 'God,' 'pure existence,' or, in Plotinus' vocabulary, the 'One.' The 'One' is the Being of each being, the Life of anything living, the Presence of anything present. While remaining always the same, it takes on the infinite forms allowed by the world, thus appearing in different guises to different peoples or creatures. Hence the paradoxical nature of the world, which is at the same time one and many: infinitely varied in its appearance, yet one in its essence and in its existence.

    To illustrate this vision, let us imagine the world as a glass prism, which is traversed by the light of an external realm beyond space and time. Neither the transparent glass nor the colourless light is visible on its own. But as soon as they meet, they bring about an explosion of colours. Each beam of coloured light, like the mythology of each religion, is just one of countless possible manifestations that result from the encounter between time and eternity, language and ineffability, the profane and the sacred.

    According to Salutius, this was precisely what the Christians had failed to understand. The Christians wished to destroy the prism of the world and to retain only the colourless light of their God. The result, however, was the complete obfuscation of reality: they were blind to the colours of the world, yet they were still unable to see the essence of God's light.

    Salutius did not hate the Christians. He believed their mistakes stemmed from ignorance rather than malice, echoing Plato's view that 'is someone were to know what is good and bad, then ... intelligence would be sufficient to save a person.' With his book [On the Gods and the World], he wished to rescue them from their error and expose them to a wider metaphysical vision. Even though the Christians were a danger to the empire and themselves, they had to be helped and forgiven. As their Messiah had said, 'they know not what they do (138 - 140).' 
Campagna, Frederico. Otherworldly: Mediterranean Lessons on Escaping History. Bloomsbury, 2025. 

--------------------------------------------------------

Alexander, Travis. "Power and Flesh." Aeon (October 31, 2025) ["The reigning biopolitical disputes hinge on deceptively simple questions: what is the body for? What should we do with it? Are there levels of biology where a difference of degree becomes a difference of kind? If a human body changes (or is changed) beyond a certain point, does it stop being an altered human body and become, instead, something else? There’s no shortage of modern artists and thinkers wrestling with these questions. The choreographer Meg Stuart pushes bodies to extremes of movement; the multimedia artist ORLAN and the transgender artist Cassils use performance to test the boundaries of flesh and identity; another performance artist, Stelarc, stages the body as machine, grafted with prosthetics. Patricia Piccinini’s sculptures imagine hybrid anatomies, while the films of Julia Ducournau – director of the body horror Titane (2021) – and Claire Denis probe bodily desire and transformation. In scholarship, Yuval Noah Harari tracks the future of the human species, Kate Crawford critiques the bodily costs of AI, and Paul B Preciado theorises on gender transition and pharmacopolitics. And yet, few voices have been as persistent – or as transformative – as David Cronenberg’s. Since the 1970s, he has been cinema’s great anatomist, staging dramas of growth, decay and mutation. Over the decades, his vision has shifted: from a romantic belief that altered bodies deserve celebration, to a more careful insistence that people should be free to alter themselves only if they choose. The arc feels natural, but it is also urgent right now. At a moment when the fight over bodies threads through disputes on everything from vaccines to elder care, Cronenberg offers a framework we need: a way to affirm bodily autonomy without stoking the panic that casts every transformed body as a threat. His cinema points toward a politics of protection – one that secures the vulnerable while refusing to weaponise their difference, and that shows how the defence of bodies can be a form of solidarity rather than a spark for fear."] 

Anderson, Ellie and David Peña-Guzmán. "Masculinity." Overthink (September 23, 2025) ["Performative males, hustle bros, sissies, and manfluencers. In episode 140 of Overthink, Ellie and David discuss masculinity. What does it mean to be a man, and how has the concept of masculinity changed over time? They look at the male loneliness epidemic, the current influx of male influencers spreading right-wing rhetoric on the manosphere, and some of the main features of masculinity. Is masculinity rooted in violence and homophobia, or is it possible to have a healthy model of masculinity? In the Substack bonus, your hosts get into the mythopoetic men's movement and the connection between haircuts and masculinity."
Robert Brannon and Deborah Sarah David, The Forty-nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role
Pierre Bourdieu, La domination masculine
R.W. Connell, Gender and Power
Bell Hooks, The Will To Change
James W. Messerschmidt, Hegemonic Masculinity
Joseph Pleck, The Myth of Masculinity
Todd W. Reeser, Moderating Masculinity in Early Modern Culture
Frans de Waal, Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes]

Bellar-Tadier, Luna. "The Lesbian Allure and Colonial Unconscious of Todd Field’s Tár." Another Gaze (January 25, 2023) ["Tár is a rare film for this reason. Lydia’s type of appeal is not one that is depicted often, consisting as it does of the attractiveness and the desire that belong to a self-assured, powerful older woman who possesses no stereotypical feminine charm, but only the imposing matter-of-factness of her accomplishment, and a masculinity subtle enough to be invisible to an untrained or uninterested eye. Furthermore, Tár promises to deal precisely with the deep ambivalence which stems from the way such a figure both troubles and upholds existing modes of power. This appeal remains largely illegible in our heteronormative world (and in fact its general illegibility is an important part of its experience). It’s thrilling to see someone like this on the big screen, and to know that a straight audience is being made to understand that a young and conventionally attractive woman would pursue her (“Can I text you?” asks red bag woman, grasping Lydia’s hands when their flirtation is cut short by Francesca’s agitated intervention). Moreover, inasmuch as Tár echoes the plethora of contemporary “#MeToo” narratives, depicting this appeal is crucial to telling this story responsibly, for to not give the viewer a window into her desirability – sexual or otherwise – would render the women that flock to her mere dupes."]

Charman, Helen. "After the Hunt." Another Gaze (November 4, 2025) ["After the Hunt mistreats its material. Eva Victor’s sensitive, funny Sorry, Baby (2025) offers a useful counterpoint. In this film, too, the audience is told about but never shown the sexual assault of a graduate student, Agnes, by her professor. But rather than constructing a game of ‘he said, she said’, Sorry Baby makes a feminist choice: it takes Agnes at her word. She discloses what happened to her best friend and fellow student, who believes her immediately and completely without requiring specifics: the act itself is named only as ‘the bad thing’. Victor’s camera remains steady on Agnes’s face as she describes as much as she can of what has happened to her, in her own time. Rape does not need to be described to be identified, especially in an institutional context littered with historical and cultural examples of such abuses of power. Throughout Victor’s film, Agnes’s right to refuse to describe her experience is defended against the many cultural and institutional imperatives to do so, whether in the courtroom, the bedroom, or the doctor’s office."]

Chawlisz, Claudia. " Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies." Past Present Future (September 21, 2025) ["David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?"]

Freedman, Sam. " Fixing Democracy: TikTok, Disinformation and Distraction." Past Present Future (October 19, 2025) ["In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?"]

Glied, Sherry and Paul Starr. "Health Insurance in America." Throughline (February 27, 2025) ["Millions of Americans depend on their jobs for health insurance. But that's not the case in many other wealthy countries. How did the U.S. end up with a system that's so expensive, yet leaves so many people vulnerable? On this episode, how a temporary solution created an everlasting problem." Guests: Sherry Glied, Dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University; Paul Starr, professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University."]

Gretton, Dan. "Desk killers: the psychology of committing crimes against humanity." History Extra Podcast (November 21, 2022) ["Author Dan Gretton discusses his book I You We Them, which examines the psychology of individuals who organised and implemented some of the worst crimes against humanity, from the Holocaust to human rights violations in Nigeria. In conversation with Rachel Dinning, he introduces the concept of the ‘desk killer’ – a perpetrator who is responsible for murder without taking an active role in the killing."]

Harman, Elizabeth. "The Ethics of Abortion." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 14, 2025) ["Abortion is the intentional termination of a pregnancy, either via surgery or via the taking of medication. Ordinary people disagree about abortion: many people think abortion is deeply morally wrong, while many others think abortion is morally permissible. Philosophy has much to contribute to this discussion, by distinguishing and clarifying different arguments against abortion, distinguishing and clarifying different responses to those arguments, offering novel arguments against abortion, offering novel defenses of abortion, and offering novel views about the relevant issues at stake."]

Harper, Shaun. "You Didn’t See What You Saw: Lessons for students on Renee Good’s death and the politization of facts." Inside Higher Ed (January 12, 2026) ["Just as people around the world are listening to dueling interpretations of what happened to Good, so too are students in K–12 schools and on college campuses across America. Those who have scrolled social media platforms or watched news with their families in recent days have likely seen at least one video showing the ICE agent firing his gun into Good’s vehicle. Their government leaders are telling them that they don’t see what they see. This is noteworthy for at least three reasons. First, it teaches students how to heartlessly politicize the loss of life. Defending the federal government’s actions is seemingly more important than is empathy for Good, her wife and children, and those in her community who witnessed what happened on a snowy Minnesota street that day. The lesson for students is that partisan loyalty and the advancement of a White House administration’s policy agenda (in this case, the mass deportation of immigrants) justify cruel responses to a citizen’s death. Also, they are learning that just about anything rationalizes the relentless pursuit of a partisan mission, regardless of who gets hurt and what crimes are committed."]

Hedges, Chris. "America the Rogue State." Films for Action (January 5, 2025) ["Can anyone seriously make the argument that the U.S. is a democracy? Are there any democratic institutions that function? Is there any check on state power? Is there any mechanism that can enforce the rule of law at home, where legal residents are snatched by masked thugs from our streets, where a phantom “radical left” is an excuse to criminalize dissent, where the highest court in the land bestows king-like power and immunity on Trump? Can anyone pretend that with the demolition of environmental agencies and laws — which should help us confront the looming ecocide, the gravest threat to human existence — there is any concern for the common good? Can anyone make the argument that the U.S. is the defender of human rights, democracy, a rule based order and the “virtues” of Western civilization? Our reigning gangsters will accelerate the decline. They will steal as much as they can, as fast as they can, on the way down. The Trump family has pocketed more than $1.8 billion in cash and gifts since the 2024 re-election. They do so as they mock the rule of law and tighten their vice-like grip. The walls are closing in. Free speech is abolished on college campuses and the airwaves. Those who decry the genocide lose their jobs or are deported. Journalists are slandered and censored. ICE, powered by Palantir — with a budget of $170 billion over four years — is laying the foundations for a police state. It has expanded the number of its agents by 120 percent. It is building a nationwide complex of detention centers. Not solely for the undocumented. But for us. Those outside the gates of the empire will fare no better with a $1 trillion budget for the war machine."]

Hirschhorn, Sara Yael, et al. "The Rise of the Right Wing in Israel." Throughline (October 12, 2025) ["This week, we’re bringing you the story of the rise of right wing politics in Israel and President Benjamin Netanyahu’s political career."]

Hudson, David. "Oliver Laxe’s Sirât." Current (November 11, 2025) ["“The resilience of this group,” writes Filmmaker editor Scott Macaulay, “their small-scale collectivism, and the way in which dance, and drugs, are a kind of social and even spiritual practice, as opposed to simple escapism, made me think of the late Mark Fisher’s final unfinished work, ‘Acid Communism,’ and his thinking here is an analogue to the movie’s techno-scored hedonic flow: ‘The crucial defining feature of the psychedelic is the question of consciousness, and its relationship to what is experienced as reality. If the very fundamentals of our experience, such as our sense of space and time, can be altered, does that not mean that the categories by which we live are plastic, mutable?’”"]

Ioannidis, John. "How Profit and Politics Hijacked Scientific Inquiry." Capitalisn't (September 18, 2025)  ["Why does a podcast about capitalism want to talk about science? Modern capitalism and science have evolved together since the Enlightenment. Advances in ship building and navigation enabled the Age of Discovery, which opened up new trade routes and markets to European merchants. The invention of the spinning jinny and cotton in the 18th century spurred textile production. The United States’ Department of Defense research and development agency helped create the precursor to the internet. The internet now supports software and media industries worth trillions of dollars. On the flip side, some of America’s greatest capitalists and businesses, including Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and Bell Labs, gave us everything from electricity production to the transistor. Neither science nor capitalism can succeed without the other. However, science’s star is now dimming. Part of this is due to political intervention. In the U.S., the federal government has cut funding for scientific research. The Covid-19 pandemic diminished the public’s trust in scientific experts, which social media has exacerbated through misinformation. Restrictions on immigration may further hamper scientific research as some of the world’s brightest minds lose access to funding and state-of-the-art facilities. But so too has capitalism played a hand in science’s struggles. While corporations sponsor a significant portion of funding for scientific research, this funding too often comes with undisclosed conflicts of interest. Or corporate pressure may influence results in other ways. Stanford University professor John Ioannidis is a physician, writer, and one of the world's most-cited scientists. He studies the methodology and sociology of science itself: how the process and standards for empirical research influence findings in ways that some may find inaccurate. His 2005 essay "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is one of the most accessed articles in the history of Public Library of Science (PLOS), with more than three million views. Ioannidis joins Bethany and Luigi to discuss the future of the relationship between capitalism and science, how both will have to respond to contemporary politics, and how one even conceptualizes robust measurements of scientific success."]

Jilani, Seema. "A War Zone Pediatrician on What Comes After the Horrors of a Gaza Emergency Room." Literary Hub (March 5, 2025) ["In trying to fathom the unfathomable scenes of human tragedy in Gaza, I have turned to women whom I knew would not offer performative allyship or suggest moderating my tone of anger; nor would they diminish my tears or silence my voice as so many do. They have, not coincidentally, also been prominent women whose identities have been sculpted by Western colonialism. I have leaned on Fatima Bhutto, a writer and novelist who hails from one of South Asia’s most intriguing political dynasties, the Bhutto family of Pakistan. I have confided in Najla Said, actor, playwright and daughter of the Palestinian American intellectual Edward Said. His work implored the West to leave behind exotified images of Asia and the Middle East, seeing them as mirages which exist only to justify Western colonial aspirations. Said had a transformative influence on the humanities with his landmark book, Orientalism, which upended the prism through which postcolonialism would be studied. People like myself, Fatima, and Najla are daughters born of colonization. We have been forced to face a deep reckoning with the silencing of our voices on Gaza, enduring threats to our livelihood, our families, and even our own safety. Model minorities and children of refugees like us are the forgotten corollaries to dead empires. We are exotified, tokenized, sexualized, and lauded as consummate children of the diaspora."]

Kretser, Michelle de. "'I ask you—I beg you—to join us in speaking out for Palestine.' From her acceptance speech for the 2025 Stella Prize." Literary Hub (May 23, 2025) ["Recently, two groups of women have been on my mind. In the first group are Jo Case, Sophie Cunningham, Monica Dux, Christine Gordon, Foong Ling Kong, Rebecca Starford, Louise Swinn and Aviva Tuffield: the founders of the Stella Prize. My respect and gratitude to those eight women, who rejected business as usual, who decided to make the world a more equitable place, and whose activism resulted, against the odds, in the Stella Prize and the transformation of our literary landscape. Even if I knew the names of everyone in the second group, there wouldn’t be time to read them out, for they’re the women and girls of Gaza. They’re the women and girls murdered, maimed, starved, raped, tortured, terrorised, orphaned, bereaved, incarcerated, dehumanised, displaced, in business as usual for Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing—war crimes for which Australia provides material and diplomatic support. That complicity has had serious consequences for Australian democracy. We’ve seen scholars, creatives and journalists silenced, their funding revoked and their contracts cancelled for expressing anti-genocide views. We’ve seen precious rights eroded and authoritarian laws rushed in on the flimsiest of pretexts. We’ve seen our institutions and our media betray the principles they’re supposed to uphold. We’ve seen language suffer Orwellian distortions. We’ve seen our leaders pander to the anti-Arab racism of that global bully the United States. And all of this damage has been done to prop up Israel: a brazenly cruel foreign power, whose leaders are internationally wanted criminals."]

Laing, Olivia. "What did Pasolini know? Fifty years after his brutal murder, the director’s vision of fascism is more urgent than ever." The Guardian (November 1, 2025) ["I think Pasolini was right, and I’m certain that the warnings he kept uttering were why he was killed. He saw the future we’re now in long before anyone else. He saw that capitalism would corrode into fascism, or that fascism would infiltrate and take over capitalism, that what appeared benign and beneficial would corrupt and destroy old forms of life. He knew that compliance and complicity were lethal. He warned about the ecological costs of industrialisation. He foresaw how television would transform politics, though he was dead before Silvio Berlusconi came to power. I do not think the ascent of Trump, a politician formed in Berlusconi’s mould, would have surprised him very much."]

Leonard, Christopher. "The Meat Racket." Radio West (March 7, 2014) ["Just a handful of companies raise nearly all the meat consumed in America, and among them, Tyson Foods is king. According to the journalist Christopher Leonard, Tyson wrote the blueprint for modern meat production. He says there’s no better way to understand how our food is produced than to know how the company works. In a new book, Leonard explores how Tyson mastered the economics of factory farming to rise to the top, and how it transformed rural America and the middle class economy in the process."]

Lie-Nielsen, Kirsten.  "The Push To Get Invasive Crabs On The Menu." NOEMA (November 11, 2025)  ["Humans can be very effective at controlling animal populations when motivated to do so. We have hunted native species to extinction, so one approach that scientists and chefs are experimenting with is the consumption of invasives — also known as invasivorism — to try to control their expanding numbers. The strategy of “beating by eating” unwelcome creatures has been embraced around the world. Humans have reshaped entire ecosystems with their appetites."]

Marriot, James. "The Dawn of the Post-Literate Society." Cultural Capital (September 19, 2025) ["As Postman pointed out, it is no accident, that the growth of print culture in the eighteenth century was associated with the growing prestige of reason, hostility to superstition, the birth of capitalism, and the rapid development of science. Other historians have linked the eighteenth century explosion of literacy to the Enlightenment, the birth of human rights, the arrival of democracy and even the beginnings of the industrial revolution. The world as we know it was forged in the reading revolution. ... Now, we are living through the counter-revolution. More than three hundred years after the reading revolution ushered in a new era of human knowledge, books are dying. Numerous studies show that reading is in free-fall. Even the most pessimistic twentieth-century critics of the screen-age would have struggled to predict the scale of the present crisis."]

Moran, Dan and Mike Takla. "The Beast: A Film by Bertrand Botello." Fifteen Minute Film Fanatics (November 10, 2025) ["Have you ever felt that you keep making the same mistakes or that you have fallen into a pattern that could be Exhibit A as proof of reincarnation? The Beast (2023) uses all kinds of world-building and three different timelines to explore these ideas–and does so while faithfully adapting a 1903 story by Henry James. It’s the kind of film in which one could be lost in the red arrows that point out movie Easter eggs all over YouTube, but the real draw of the film is its incredible performances and how it combines intricate plotting with emotional weight."]

Narayanan, Arvind. "What Everyone's Getting Wrong About AI." Capitalisn't (October 16, 2025) ["Every major technological revolution has come with a bubble: railroads, electricity, dot-com. Is it AI’s turn? With investments skyrocketing and market valuations reaching the trillions, the stakes are enormous. But are we witnessing a genuine revolution—or the early stages of a spectacular crash? Princeton professor Arvind Narayanan joins Luigi Zingales and Bethany McLean to explain why he believes AI’s transformative impact is overstated. Drawing on his book AI Snake Oil, co-authored with Sayash Kapoor, Narayanan argues that capitalism’s incentives can distort technological progress, pushing hype faster than reality can deliver. They examine how deregulation, geopolitical competition, and private control over data shape the trajectory of AI’s development. They also explore what could happen if the bubble bursts: massive market shocks, exposed structural weaknesses in the economy, and a wave of painful restructuring that could echo the dot-com crash—but on a far larger scale. It’s a conversation that cuts through the hype and asks what’s at stake when an entire economy bets on one technology."]

Nestle, Marion. "The Money Behind Ultra-Processed Food." Capitalisn't (May 23, 2024) ["Critics of the food industry allege that it relentlessly pursues profits at the expense of public health. They claim that food companies "ultra-process" products with salt, sugar, fats, and artificial additives, employ advanced marketing tactics to manipulate and hook consumers, and are ultimately responsible for a global epidemic of health ailments. Companies are also launching entirely new lines and categories of food products catering to diabetes or weight management drugs such as Ozempic. Marion Nestle, a leading public health advocate, nutritionist, award-winning author, and Professor Emerita at New York University, first warned in her 2002 book "Food Politics" that Big Food deliberately designs unhealthy, addictive products to drive sales, often backed by industry-funded research that misleads consumers. This week on Capitalisn't, Nestle joins Bethany and Luigi to explore the ultra-processed food industry through the interplay of four lenses: the underlying science, business motives, influencing consumer perceptions, and public policy."]

Ryan, David. "Satirizing Horror and Spellbinding the Social Contract: Weapons (2025)." Film International (November 18, 2025) ["As a follow-up to Zach Cregger’s horror drama Barbarian (2022), Weapons explores the recursive relationship between personal antagonisms and the erosion of civic trust, staging what Robin Wood identifies as horror’s central tension—the destabilization of the social order….”"]

West, Stephen. "Achievement Society and the rise of narcissism, depression and anxiety - Byung-Chul Han." #188 Philosophize This! (September 6, 2023) ["In this episode, Byung-Chul Han’s theory of positive power takes center stage, building on themes of surveillance, control, and the modern self. Han argues that we no longer live in a disciplinary society where behavior is regulated through prohibition and punishment; instead, we exist within an achievement society governed by the illusion of total freedom. This shift replaces the coercive “should” with the self-imposed “can,” encouraging individuals to optimize themselves endlessly under the guise of autonomy. Han sees this as a sophisticated form of domination: people internalize the pressure to constantly improve, turning themselves into marketable projects, and framing their worth in terms of productivity and efficiency. In doing so, they lose touch with “the Other”—that which is different, imperfect, or disruptive to self-centered striving. Han links this to rising levels of depression and burnout, noting how technology reinforces this isolation by offering shallow, self-affirming experiences in place of real connection. True thinking, he argues, requires slowness, contemplation, and a deliberate effort to engage with difference. Rather than succumbing to a world of sameness, Han urges a return to presence, rest, and a deeper sense of the Other—practices that offer a quiet resistance to the invisible forces shaping modern life."
Further Reading:
The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han (2015)
Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power by Byung-Chul Han (2017)
The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord (1967)​]

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Lawfare Daily: Podcast/Legal Issues/National Security/Government Policy (Azimuths)



"Lawfare is a non-profit multimedia publication dedicated to “Hard National Security Choices.” We provide non-partisan, timely analysis of thorny legal and policy issues through our written, audio, and other content—all of which you can find here. We strive to achieve academic-level depth with magazine-level readability at the pace of news. We aim to improve the discourse on the law and policy of national security with a relentless focus on substantive issues that matter—in a fashion that is useful to policymakers and practitioners, but also accessible to anyone who wants to access it. Our areas of coverage range from national security law, threats to democracy, cybersecurity, executive powers, content moderation, domestic extremism, and foreign policy, among many others.

Lawfare comprises an in-house team of editors and correspondents, as well as an array of regular contributors ranging from current and former government officials to journalists, practicing lawyers, academics, and other experts. We also offer a Student Contributor program that aims to foster the next generation of national security professionals." - Source



 
-------------------------------------------------------

Cohn, Lindsay P., et al. "The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil." Lawfare Daily (November 8, 2025) [" Lawfare General Counsel and Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson held a series of conversations with contributors to a special series of articles on “The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil” that Lawfare recently published on its website, in coordination with our friends at Protect Democracy. Participants include: Alex Tausanovitch, Policy Advocate at Protect Democracy; Laura Dickinson, a Professor at George Washington University Law School; Joseph Nunn, Counsel in the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center; Chris Mirasola, an Assistant Professor at the University of Houston Law Center; Mark Nevitt, a Professor at Emory University School of Law; Elaine McCusker, a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; and Lindsay P. Cohn, a Professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval War College. Together, they discussed how and why domestic deployments are being used, the complex set of legal authorities allowing presidents and governors to do so, and what the consequences might be, both for U.S. national security and for U.S. civil-military relations more generally."]

Glick, Jacob. "A Jan. 6 Committee Staff Member on Far-Right Extremism." Lawfare Daily (January 10, 2026) ["The Jan. 6 committee’s final report on the insurrection is over 800 pages, including the footnotes. But there’s still new information coming out about the committee’s findings and its work. Last week, we brought you an , one of the staffers who worked on the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation into the role of social media in the insurrection. Today, we’re featuring a conversation with Jacob Glick, who served as investigative counsel on the committee and is currently a policy counsel at Georgetown’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection. His work in the Jan. 6 investigation focused on social media and far-right extremism. Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic spoke with Jacob about what the investigation showed him about the forces that led to Jan. 6, how he understands the threat still posed by extremism, and what it was like interviewing Twitter whistleblowers and members of far-right groups who stormed the Capitol."]

Godar, Bryn and Carolyn Shapiro. "Can Minnesota Prosecute Ice Agent Jonathan Ross." Lawfare Daily (January 22, 2026) ["Senior Editor Anna Bower spoke with Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of Chicago-Kent College of Law's Institute on the Supreme Court, and Bryna Godar, a Staff Attorney with the at the University of Wisconsin Law School. The discussion covered the state of Minnesota’s jurisdiction to criminally investigate Jonathan Ross, the ICE official who reportedly shot and killed Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7. The conversation also covered obstacles state prosecutors might face in pursuing a potential prosecution and the likelihood that Ross could raise what’s known as 'Supremacy Clause immunity.'"]

Saturday, January 10, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #2

... Eurocentrism ... is the view that enshrines the hierarchical stratifications inherited from Western colonial domination, assumed to be inevitable and even "progressive." Eurocentrism does not refer to Europe in its literal sense as a continent or a geopolitical unit but rather to an intellectual orientation rooted in colonial power, an interlocking network of buried premises, embedded narratives, and submerged tropes, that perceives Europe (and the neo-Europes around the world) as universally normative (4). - Stam, Robert. Keywords in Subversive Film/Media AestheticsWiley/Blackwell, 2015.

----------------------------------------------------------- 

   Reality, considered in itself and as a whole, is a chaos so deep and immense that it exceeds any possibility of being understood or experienced. Even something as small as a pebble, if we consider it to the full extent of its existence, becomes a mystery beyond comprehension. We can detect only a fragment of this chaos, as filtered by our perceptive apparatus and cognitive limits. Through our imagination, based on our personal inclinations and on the cosmological assumptions of our society, we mould this remaining piece into one of the infinite forms that reality can take. This activity of the imagination provides us with a cosmos, a 'world': a place where we can develop those structures of sense that shelter us from the trauma of having been thrown unprepared into a mortal life. Then, spurred by the force of habit and by a desire for comfort, we become progressively convinced that the world we have constructed is an accurate picture of 'nature,' and that reality coincides with the metaphysical consensus of a particular society at a certain moment in history. We tend to forget the imaginary essence of the 'world' that we see around ourselves, and we start drawing hard distinctions between what we see as 'truly existing' and what we set aside as 'mere fantasy.' (4)

    This, too, is a timely lesson: if rational languages, such as philosophy and science, aim to offer a structure of sense for human life, they must recognize themselves, at least in part, as forms of literature. If they want to make their hard logical kernel inhabitable by living creatures, they should not overlook the need to translate into the soft substance of narrative. (10)

    Since the infinite chaos of reality will always exceed the limits of any conceptual system, we should recognize that all of our attempts at reducing it to a meaningful cosmos are merely 'likely stories' - like the eikos mythos of Plato's Timaeus - at once plagued by, and endowed with, the porous quality of literature. Every conceptual world that we might devise is ultimately a story for us to live by, and the better ones are not those that reach closer to an absolute truth beyond our grasp, but those that are spacious and flexible enough to offer an imaginary home where a dignified life for all becomes possible. (10 - 11)
Campagna, Frederico. Otherworldly: Mediterranean Lessons on Escaping History. Bloomsbury, 2025.


---------------------------------------------------------------- 

When I was working on my MA in Popular Culture/Cultural Studies I took two classes on serial killers when I was considering writing a thesis on the burgeoning late 90s cultural phenomenon of representations of the SK. One was a traditional Humanities course using novels/short stories, films, and theory books. It was a fascinating derive through the underbelly of American culture. The second one was a Criminology course taught by an ex-detective and it was a frightening dive into actual SKs, SK fandom, and SK hunters (not as well known at that time). We accessed the Body Farm, regularly watched a police cable station (not available to the public) that showed vivid/disturbing reports on SK activities, and other things that I would have preferred not to know. I was fully aware that SKs are rare and there are thousands of other ways I am more likely to die from, but it still infected me with a deep fear for a while. As a lifelong outdoor enthusiast, it put a damper on solo rough camping for a couple of years. I also SK proofed my apartment at the time (including strategically laying out weapons at key places). Laughing, sounds weird, when I write it out 😉


A part of my thesis on the phenomenon was that it was being overblown and used to stoke fear in a reactionary manner (using culture to fuel politicized fear, still prevalent in our culture today). Serial Killers do exist, but they are extremely rare, even if some are prolific. I’m much more scared of desk top/button pusher killers (this line of thought was initiated by my readings of Hannah Arendt), we need more focus on their role in human agony, death, and terror. - Michael D. Benton (10/30/25)

--------------------------------------------------------------

... in each successive drive to war or state sponsored sanctions against countries that do not play ball with American corporate interests, we see the same official government or corporate media experts, many with connections to private industries profiting off American wars, acting as “expert” talking heads on network and cable TV shows weighing in on whether America should invade or target a country. As David Barstow in The New York Times (April 20, 2008) states: “To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as ‘military analysts’ whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-9/11 world.” These experts are presented as objective, but they are clearly a part of a corporate/pentagon and presidential agenda to generate favorable coverage for war and intervention agendas. The public, and often the networks, do not understand these “experts” connections to the current administration and the military-industrial complex.

Meanwhile globally recognized experts on American political issues that raise critical questions about American foreign and domestic policies are marginalized or attacked in the corporate media. Noam Chomsky, one of the most important and globally celebrated political analysts is completely missing from corporate media. Glenn Greenwald, a former constitutional lawyer and national security analyst, is regularly attacked and dismissed because of his fierce criticisms of policy decisions regardless of which party is in power. The perceived problem isn't that he has a critical voice, it is instead that he critiques power in a systematic manner and calls out abuses no matter the politics of the offenders. In fact, polarized party politics and their media watchdogs have made it the ultimate sin for a conscious critic to stick to a focused critique of an important issue no matter who is in power. Many other important voices in the independent media and from around the world (the remaining 15% of media) are regularly ignored in the corporate media which informs the majority of American citizens. This stifling of critical questioning of the world-as-it-is and broad-based fearmongering seeks to reinforce our fealty to the dominant power structure. Knee-jerk patriotism and in-group bias in reality-show America is not simply a denial of critical thinking, it is also a targeted attempt to erase the realities of the marginalized (culturally, economically, geographically and socially). There have been many studies that have noted how heavy media consumption makes us much more afraid of the world outside because of the distorted realities of both news shows and repetitive entertainments that focus on a law and enforcement mentality as the only hope in a violent and chaotic world. This has only increased in a search algorithm and social media age that isolates unaware users in filter bubbles that situate them like betta fish in their tiny fishbowl staring out and viewing any other nearby betta fish as an enemy. The hatred and distrust resulting from these isolating and anxiety-inducing processes often most affects marginal populations, because the mainstream corporate culture mostly reflects the limited desires and fears of the dominant culture, which in turn, labels or targets those perceived as the "other." - Benton, Michael D. "Ideological Becoming." Dialogic Cinephilia (September 30, 2022)


----------------------------------------------------------------

Abrams, Nathan. "Kubrick's World: Power, Paranoia, and the Politics of the Human Condition." International Horizons (October 28, 2025) ["In this episode of International Horizons, Interim Director Eli Karetny speaks with film scholar Nathan Abrams about the enduring relevance of Stanley Kubrick and what his work can teach us about our current era. From the nuclear absurdities of Dr. Strangelove to the cosmic rebirth of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Kubrick’s films expose the fragile line between technological mastery and moral collapse. Abrams unpacks Kubrick’s fascination with war, authority, and obedience, his roots in the New York Jewish intellectual tradition, and his exploration of mystical and mythic themes—from Kabbalah to The Odyssey. Together, they reveal how Kubrick’s cinematic universe reflects our own: a world where human creativity, paranoia, and power intertwine in both terrifying and illuminating ways."]

Benjamin, Ruha. "Race After Technology." Data After Society (November 26, 2019) ["Ruha Benjamin discusses the relationship between machine bias and systemic racism, analyzing specific cases of “discriminatory design” and offering tools for a socially-conscious approach to tech development. In "Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code," Ruha Benjamin cuts through tech-industry hype, from everyday apps to complex algorithms, to understand how emerging technologies can reinforce White supremacy and deepen social inequity. Presenting the concept of “the new Jim Code,” she shows how a range of discriminatory designs encode inequity by explicitly amplifying racial hierarchies; by ignoring but thereby replicating social divisions; or by aiming to fix racial bias but ultimately doing quite the opposite."]

Bray, Mark. "The New Power of Far Right Influencers." Uncanny Valley (October 16, 2025) ["History professor Mark Bray is no stranger to death threats. As the author of the book Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, published in 2017, he has received backlash and harassment from far-right circles for almost a decade. But things recently escalated after the Trump administration designated antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization,” and far-right influencers with a newfound power targeted Bray. Mike sits down with WIRED’s David Gilbert and Leah Feiger to discuss what went down, how the role of far-right influencers has expanded exponentially during the past year, and what responsibility tech companies carry."]

Budhathoki, Abishek. "After the Ban, Toward Enlightenment: Bhutan’s New Wave of Spiritual Cinema." Notebook (October 16, 2025) ["After a delayed start, Bhutanese filmmakers are creating a distinctive cinematic language grounded in their cultural memory, forging a new wave of cinema that stages a dialogue between tradition and innovation, spiritual insight and artistry. From this remarkably compressed timeframe has come a body of work that resists Western narrative and cinematic conventions. These films have proven that a national cinema does not require decades of development before achieving philosophical sophistication. Instead, by drawing directly from centuries of Buddhist thought and practice, Bhutan’s directors have created mature meditations on existence, attachment, and transcendence. As this youngest of all national cinemas continues to evolve, it stands as proof that innovation in film language comes from a thoughtful translation of tradition, essential insights, and storytelling strategies into contemporary forms."]

 Cucarro, Clara. "Quiet Americans: Kelly Reichardt’s Cinema of Attention." Notebook (October 17, 2025) ["Across 30 years of Reichardt’s cinema, mundane details and subtle gestures are often tasked with conveying the essence of her human dramas. In a profile for The New Yorker, Doreen St. Félix calls Reichardt America’s “finest observer of ordinary grit.” The description is apt, though her protagonists have depth as well as texture; their precise cultural and historical resonances belie their “ordinariness.” Reichardt’s filmography revolves around quiet Americans whose shyness, reticence, or reserve may be, at least in part, a response to the social conditions of their gender, class, and race. Think of Wendy (Michelle Williams), the drifter at the center of Wendy and Lucy (2008), whose economic precarity is evident in the way she counts her change and avoids eye contact; or Jamie (Lily Gladstone), the lonely Indigenous American ranch hand in Certain Women (2016), whose romantic longing for a professional white woman, Beth (Kristen Stewart), is never put into words. Avoiding unnatural dialogue that could reveal too much about her characters, Reichardt focuses on behavior, gesture, and routine, asking viewers to extrapolate character through visual cues rather than verbal exposition."]

Davis, Matthew. "On Mount Rushmore, Wounded Knee & Medals of Honor, Deadwood, the Lakota, Stone Mountain and the Klan, American Aesthetics, Custer, Whitman, Jackson, and the Black Hills." The History of Philosophy Audio Archive (January 6, 2026) ["Who do the Black Hills really belong to? Was George Armstrong Custer a hero, an idiot, or a fanatic? Who carved Mount Rushmore, and what was it supposed to represent (the "apotheosis of Western Civilization?") What happened at Wounded Knee (in 1890, and 1973) - and why does Secretary of War (sic) Pete Hegseth (sick) want to make sure that those Medals of Honor are preserved? ... Matthew Davis, [is the] author of A Biography of a Mountain: The Making and Meaning of Mount Rushmore. Books mentioned:
The Heartbeat of Wounded Knee by David Treuer
American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World by David E. Stannard
Death Sonnet for Custer by Walt Whitman (later titled "From Far Dakota's Canons" in Leaves of Grass)]

Ford, Phil and J.F. Martel. "What a Fool Believes: On the Unnumbered Card in the Tarot." Weird Studies #77 (July 8, 2020) ["'What a fool believes he sees, no wise man can reason away.' This line from a Doobie Brothers song is probably one of the most profound in the history of rock-'n'-roll. It is profound for all the reasons (or unreasons) explored in this discussion, which lasers in on just one of the major trumps of the traditional tarot deck, that of the Fool. The Fool is integral to the world, yet stands outside it. The Fool is an idiot but also a sage. The Fool does not know; s/he intuits, improvises a path through the brambles of existence. We intend this episode on the Fool to be the first in an occasional series covering all twenty-two of the major trumps of the Tarot of Marseilles." List of books mentioned/discussed on the page.]

Gavin, Francis. "The Lost Art of Thinking Historically." NOEMA (September 11, 2025)  ["What we have lost, and what we desperately need to reclaim, is a different mode of cognition, a historical sensibility. This is not about memorizing dates and facts. It is, as the historian Gordon S. Wood describes it, a “different consciousness,” a way of understanding that profoundly influences how we see the world. It is a temperament that is comfortable with uncertainty, sensitive to context and aware of the powerful, often unpredictable rhythms of the past. To cultivate this sensibility is to acquire the intellectual virtues of modesty, curiosity and empathy — an antidote to the hubris of rigid, monocausal thinking. ... This process is fundamentally different from that of many other disciplines. Where social sciences often seek to create generalizable, predictive and parsimonious theories — the simplest explanation for the largest number of things — history revels in complexity. A historical sensibility is skeptical of master ideas or unitary historical motors. It recognizes that different things happen for different reasons, that direct causal connections can be elusive, and that the world is rife with unintended consequences. It makes no claim to predict the future; rather, it seeks to deepen our understanding of how the past unfolded into our present, reminding us, as British historian Sir Llewellyn Woodward said, that “our ignorance is very deep.” This sensibility compels us to reconsider concepts we take for granted. We use terms such as “capitalism” and “human rights” as if they are timeless and universal, when in fact they are concepts that emerged and evolved at particular historical moments, often identified and defined by historians. A historical consciousness demands that we seek the origins of things we thought we understood and empathize with the past in its own context. This is to imagine ourselves in the shoes of those who came before, wrestling with their dilemmas in their world. It doesn’t mean suspending moral judgment, but rather being less confident that we — here today — have a monopoly on timeless insight." This essay is adapted from his new book “Thinking Historically: A Guide to Statecraft and Strategy” (Yale University Press, 2025).]

Goi, Leonardo. "The Dream Machine: Bi Gan on Resurrection." Notebook (December 12, 2025) ["It’s difficult to feel pessimistic about the fate of cinema while watching a film like Resurrection (2025). Bi Gan’s third feature—his biggest and most ambitious production to date—is a work of art so unabashedly convinced of the medium’s capacity for wonder that the belief becomes contagious. Bi’s previous films—both set in Guizhou, his native province in Southwest China—radiate that same devotional love; like Resurrection, they’re pitched along the nebulous border between hallucinations and waking life. Kaili Blues (2015) and Long Day’s Journey into Night (2018) do not just mimic an oneiric aesthetic but actually move like dreams, nowhere more convincingly than when Bi performs his high-wire act: the long, unbroken take, a meticulously choreographed feat of continuous motion that elevates his films to an ethereal, mesmeric realm. In his debut feature, the director undertook a 41-minute tracking shot that follows characters around a riverfront village; in his sophomore effort, the long take stretched across the film’s entire second hour, a 3D journey that sends us gliding down a cable tramway and into a sepulchral town. Resurrection too features one such sequence, but it is a measure of the film’s majesty that the 36-minute shot is only one of many sensational moments. Split into five chapters—each orbiting one of the senses and told in a distinct cinematic style—and sprinting through the twentieth century, Resurrection begins as a Blade Runner–esque sci-fi fairy tale. “In a wild era,” a title card warns, humanity has discovered that it is possible to achieve immortality if they are willing to stop dreaming altogether. But there are a select few who’d rather live shorter, more vivid lives, enlivened by those nighttime visions. Bi and his cowriter Zhai Xiaohui call them “Fantasmers,” melancholic wanderers who “bring chaos to history” and “make time jump”; they’re eternally pursued by the “Big Others,” vigilantes who can tell truth from fiction and must awake the Fantasmers to keep chronologies in check."]

Gourgouris, Stathis. "On Edward Said's Orientalism." Writ Large (November 8, 2022) ["Beginning in the 17th century, European countries began colonizing countries east of Europe. They imposed their own ideas over local cultures and extracted free labor and resources. One way that European colonizers justified this exploitation was through an academic discipline called Orientalism. In 1978, Edward Said, a professor of literature at Columbia University, published a book of the same name, Orientalism. In his critique, he challenged Europeans’ construction of the so-called “East,” laid bare the biases of Orientalist study, and transformed the course of humanities scholarship. Stathis Gourgouris is a professor of classics, English, and comparative literature at Columbia University. He is the author of books such as Dream Nation: Enlightenment, Colonization, and the Institution of Modern Greece and Does Literature Think?: Literature as Theory for an Antimythical Era."]

Grady, Constance. "The right is obsessed with Lord of the Rings. But they don’t understand it." Vox (October 31, 2025) ["Among the many humiliations of being American in the current moment is this: Members of the tech right and the conservative ruling class continually fetishize objects of nerd culture while also displaying a willful inability to grasp the very basic messages those objects are sending. While there are certainly worse problems (e.g. white nationalism in the White House), the blazing lack of reading comprehension from people who are allegedly smart does give one pause. Put simply, these people are bad nerds."]

Liu, Ken. "When the Machine Becomes the Medium." Futurology (November 4, 2025) ["The first machines mimicked our muscles. Today, they’ve learned to mirror our minds. Now they’re beginning to imitate something even closer to the core of our humanity – imagination itself. Sci-fi author, translator, and technologist Ken Liu calls this new medium the Noematagraph: a tool for capturing creativity and collaborating with AI in the same way cinema tells stories with actors, sound and a splash of light on a screen. In this episode of Futurology, Liu joins Berggruen Press’ Executive Editor Nils Gilman to explore how AI blurs the line between artist and audience, code and consciousness. They discuss why storytelling has always been humanity’s most powerful technology and how machines, by learning to tell their own stories, may change what it means to express emotion in the AI age."]

Mayor, Adrienne.  "Cursed Mountains and Deathly Lakes: When Nature Is Explained By Myth." Literary Hub (October 22, 2025) ["Geomythology raises provocative questions: How far can cultural memory extend back in time? How long can geomyths maintain their relevance, impact, and value? How long do spoken traditions survive? The answers to these questions about the “longevity of orality” keep expanding as more evidence is gathered and analyzed around the world."]

Nichols, John. "'The Dark Side': Dick Cheney’s Legacy from Iraq Invasion to U.S. Torture Program." Democracy Now (November 4, 2025) ["Dick Cheney, the former vice president and one of the key architects of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, died Monday at age 84. Cheney served six terms in Congress as Wyoming’s lone representative before serving as defense secretary under President George H.W. Bush, when he oversaw the first Gulf War and the bloody U.S. invasion of Panama that deposed former U.S. ally Manuel Noriega. From 1995 to 2000, Cheney served as chair and CEO of the oil services company Halliburton, before George W. Bush tapped him as his running mate. As vice president, Cheney was a leading proponent of invading and occupying Iraq, which killed hundreds of thousands of people and destabilized the entire region. Dick Cheney also steadfastly defended warantless mass surveillance programs and the use of torture against detainees of the so-called war on terror. We speak with The Nation’s John Nichols, author of multiple books about Cheney, who says the neoconservative leader had a “very destructive” impact on the world."]

N + 1 #51 (Fall 2025) ["ICE is of course a worthy target for resistance. It is a federal law enforcement agency that increasingly resembles a secret police force, and it’s being used to target political dissidence and arbitrarily detain whomever it wants. Created in 2003, ICE is now poised to become the highest-funded federal police force in US history. But in addition to — and in coordination with — ICE, officers from numerous other agencies are working to abduct people from farms, factories, and the streets of big cities and small towns. The extent to which this expanding federal police state relies on a vast network of jails, prisons, and local police to do its brutal work is often overlooked. The US’s sprawling carceral infrastructure — built up across the land over decades, and designed from the start to dehumanize — enables the capture and deportation of increasing numbers of people. As the federal government deputizes these federal, state, and local agencies to partake in ICE’s work, it remakes existing infrastructure and political relationships in ICE’s image: remakes them, that is, toward fascism. A recent raid in rural Kentucky illustrated several features of this transformed and expanded deportation machine. On the afternoon of May 29, 2025, armed federal agents descended on the small city of Harlan in a fleet of black SUVs and a white unmarked van. The agents — employees not of ICE, but of the Drug Enforcement Administration — raided Sazon Steakhouse, a popular Mexican restaurant. According to Jennifer McDaniels, who reported on the raid and its aftermath for the local Tri-City News, the agents handcuffed “an unconfirmed number of individuals . . . and loaded them in an unmarked white van” before driving away. Some people in the Harlan community report that there was a simultaneous raid at El Charrito, a restaurant down the road from Sazon."]

O'Sullivan, James. "The Last Days of Social Media." NOEMA (September 2, 2025)  ["Social media was built on the romance of authenticity. Early platforms sold themselves as conduits for genuine connection: stuff you wanted to see, like your friend’s wedding and your cousin’s dog. Even influencer culture, for all its artifice, promised that behind the ring‑light stood an actual person. But the attention economy, and more recently, the generative AI-fueled late attention economy, have broken whatever social contract underpinned that illusion. The feed no longer feels crowded with people but crowded with content. At this point, it has far less to do with people than with consumers and consumption. In recent years, Facebook and other platforms that facilitate billions of daily interactions have slowly morphed into the internet’s largest repositories of AI‑generated spam. Research has found what users plainly see: tens of thousands of machine‑written posts now flood public groups — pushing scams, chasing clicks — with clickbait headlines, half‑coherent listicles and hazy lifestyle images stitched together in AI tools like Midjourney."]

Risker, Paul. "Devastating Truths and Transformation Through 'Soft Power': An Interview with Farah Nabulsi." Cineaste (Fall 2025)  ["Nabulsi describes The Teacher as a fiction film that is heavily rooted in truth, reality, and the injustices that are taking place. While she draws inspiration from different real-life stories, there is one that she says was a notable influence—the story of Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier who was abducted in 2006 and held until 2011. His eventual release secured the safe return of over a thousand Palestinian political prisoners. Nabulsi tells me that many of these prisoners were women and children that were held without trial or charge in administrative detention. “I was thinking, what an insane imbalance in value for human life.” The Teacher effectively penetrates the pseudo-complexity of the Palestinian and Israeli conflict by showing there's nothing complex about it. Mainstream news media and geopolitics have sought to create a myth of complexity, but Nabulsi takes us into the effects apartheid and forced occupation have on ordinary people. The Teacher is an important film because it gives a voice to the collective Palestinian trauma that is still denied by many in the international community."]

Stonebridge, Lyndsey. "Hannah Arendt's Lessons on Love and Disobedience." Recall This Book (September 4, 2025) ["Lyndsey Stonebridge discusses her widely praised 2024 We Are Free to Change the World: Hannah Arendt’s Lessons in Love and Disobedience. Lyndsey sees both radical evil and the banality of evil at work in Nazi Germany and in the causes of suffering and death in Gaza today. She compares the moral idiocy of authoritarians (like the murderous Nazis and those who are starving Gaza) to that of philosophers who cannot hear the echoes of what they are doing."]

Stoop, Daan. "Peter Singer and Fifty Years of Animal Liberation." The Philosopher (June 4, 2025) ["In 2023’s Animal Liberation Now, the revised edition of Animal Liberation, Singer replaces outdated examples with new ones that are just as appalling. He calls the chapters on animal testing and industrial farming ‘shocking, both then and now’. Yet this grimness doesn’t prevent him from staying clear-headed. ‘I deliberately avoid emotional language,’ he once told The Guardian. ‘I’ve never considered myself an animal lover and I don’t want to speak only to animal lovers. I want people to see this as a fundamental moral wrong.’ Animal Liberation Now describes how old battery cages were replaced by ‘enriched’ ones; and how lab animals, while now somewhat better protected, are still used on a massive scale. The logic of exploitation remains: animals are still treated as machines that convert cheap feed into profitable meat. What appears to be progress often turns out to be merely cosmetic."]

Walker, Sara Imari. "The Death of the Scientist." NOEMA (December 11, 2025)  ["Will AI kill science, or will it foster a scientific revolution? The answer depends on something no one knows: What is science? ... When you see the color red, a specific experience emerges from your neural architecture responding to wavelengths between 620 and 750 nanometers. I can point to something red, and you can acknowledge you are also seeing red, but we cannot transfer the actual experience of redness from your consciousness to mine. We cannot know if we share the same inner experience. All we can share are descriptions. This is where science radically differs from experience: It is fundamentally intersubjective. If something exists only in one mind and cannot be shared, it cannot become scientific knowledge. Science requires verifying each other’s observations, building on a lineage of past discoveries and developing intergenerational consensus about reality. Scientific models must therefore be expressible in symbols, mathematics and language, because they must be copyable and interpretable between minds. Science is definitionally unstable because it is not an objective feature of reality; instead, it is more accurately understood as an evolving cultural system, bred of consensus representation and adaptive to the new knowledge we generate."]

Walter, Shoshanna. "Rehab: An American Scandal." New Books in Drugs, Addiction, and Recovery (November 8, 2025) ["In Rehab: An American Scandal (Simon and Schuster, 2025), Pulitzer finalist Shoshana Walter exposes the country’s failed response to the opioid crisis, and the malfeasance, corruption, and snake oil which blight the drug rehabilitation industry. Our country’s leaders all seem to agree: People who suffer from addiction need treatment. Today, more people have access to treatment than ever before. So why isn’t it working? The answer is that in America—where anyone can get addicted—only certain people get a real chance to recover. Despite record numbers of overdose deaths, our default response is still to punish, while rehabs across the United States fail to incorporate scientifically proven strategies and exploit patients. We’ve heard a great deal about the opioid crisis foisted on America by Big Pharma, but we’ve heard too little about the other half of this epidemic—the reason why so many remain mired in addiction. Until now. In this book, you’ll find the stories of four people who represent the failures of the rehab-industrial complex, and the ways our treatment system often prevents recovery. April is a black mom in Philadelphia, who witnessed firsthand how the government’s punitive response to the crack epidemic impeded her own mother’s recovery—and then her own. Chris, a young middle-class white man from Louisiana, received more opportunities in his addiction than April, including the chance to go to treatment instead of prison. Yet the only program the judge permitted was one that forced him to perform unpaid back-breaking labor at for-profit companies. Wendy is a mother from a wealthy suburb of Los Angeles, whose son died in a sober living home. She began investigating for-profit treatment programs—yet law enforcement and regulators routinely ignored her warnings, allowing rehab patients to die, again and again. Larry is a surgeon who himself struggled with addiction, who would eventually become one of the first Suboxone prescribers in the nation, drawing the scrutiny of the Drug Enforcement Administration. Together, these four stories illustrate the pitfalls of a system that not only fails to meet the needs of people with addiction, but actively benefits from maintaining their lower status. They also offer insight into how we might fix that system and save lives."]

West, Stephen. "Authenticity and the history of the self - Charles Taylor." Philosophize This! #239 (October 17, 2025) ["Today we talk about the work of the philosopher Charles Taylor. First, we trace the historical origins of how he views the modern self. From the Greeks to the Reformation. From Descartes to Rousseau. The modern self to him is something "irreconcilably multileveled". Then we talk about our modern focus on authenticity as a moral ideal and why Taylor thinks many people misunderstand what it requires." This episode focuses on ideas from Taylor's books The Ethics of Authenticity and Sources of the Self.]

---. "Michel Foucault Pt. 3 - Power." Philosophize This #123 (September 24, 2018) ["This episode continues the series on Michel Foucault by exploring how he challenged the idea that truth is universal and progress is rational. Building on earlier discussions of Kant, science, and criminal justice, it focuses on Madness and Civilization, where Foucault argues that modern approaches to mental illness are not more humane, but part of a broader system that objectifies and controls people under the guise of care. His method evolves from “archaeology,” which uncovers forgotten ways of thinking, to “genealogy,” which traces how ideas develop through power. Foucault reveals that modern power is no longer top-down and repressive, but diffuse and productive, shaping norms, behaviors, and identities through what he calls biopower. Rather than silencing us, power invites confession, self-surveillance, and conformity to scientific discourse. The episode closes by emphasizing that Foucault’s aim isn’t to replace dominant narratives, but to question them—revealing how they shape our lives and asking what might lie beyond them. Further Reading: Foucault: A Very Short Introduction by Gary Gutting (2005)​; The Philosophy of Foucault by Todd May (2006)​; Biopower: Foucault and Beyond edited by Vernon W. Cisney and Nicolae Morar (2015)."]

---. "The Stoics Are Wrong - Nietzsche, Schopenhauer." Philosophize This! #237 (September 30, 2025) ["Today we talk about two famous critiques of Stoicism. One by Friedrich Nietzsche who thought the Stoics weren’t life affirming enough and so rob themselves of some of the best parts of life. The other by Arthur Schopenhauer who thought the Stoics were too life-affirming of worldly things to ever reach a deep understanding of things."]

---. "Susan Sontag - Do you criticize yourself the way you criticize a movie?" Philosophize This! (March 1, 2023) [A discussion of Susan Sontag's "Against Interpretation." "In this episode, we explore how Susan Sontag—a fierce cultural critic inspired by Simone Weil—challenged the modern obsession with interpretation, both in psychoanalysis and in art. Sontag admired Weil’s uncompromising stance against the status quo and echoed that same resistance by criticizing how analysis can distance us from the immediacy of lived experience. She warned that filtering emotions and art through normative theories often alienates people from their own reality, granting undue power to experts while reducing complex experiences to predictable patterns. Instead, Sontag called for an "erotics of art"—a renewed way of engaging with form and style that invites visceral, transformative encounters rather than detached interpretation. Through this lens, she argued, we open ourselves to art—and life—in ways that allow discomfort, openness, and even confusion to shape us. The episode closes by linking this sensibility to Sontag’s belief that truth demands sacrifice, and that progress requires voices from the margins, not just those who play by the rules of reason."]

Wittenberg, Ariel. "'How come I can’t breathe?': Musk's data company draws a backlash in Memphis." Politico (May 6, 2025) ["The company’s turbines — enough to power 280,000 homes — run without emission controls in an area that leads Tennessee in asthma hospitalizations."]