Thursday, August 13, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #12

Anderson, Ellie and David Peña-Guzmán. "Manipulation." Overthink (January 21, 2026) ["Should we be sympathetic towards manipulators? In episode 157 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk about manipulation. They discuss what makes up a manipulative personality, why manipulators see social interaction as inherently combative, and what you can do when you find yourself entangled with a manipulator. They also explore what Niccolo Machiavelli tell us about the role of manipulation in politics. Should political leaders always be kind? Or, as Machiavelli says, do they need to learn to “be bad”? And what can we say about manipulation outside of politics? Does manipulative behavior require awareness and intention? Are all forms of manipulation inherently bad? And where do we draw the line between manipulation and other types of social influence?"]

Benjamin, Ruha. "On Imagination: A Manifesto." Poured Over (January 24, 2024) ["Imagination: A Manifesto by Ruha Benjamin reminds us that our imaginations already know what a better world looks like. From education to challenging our systems of oppression and more, this insightful work shows a new place for us all to start from. Benjamin joins us to talk about the split between imagination and technology, changing our narratives to tell new stories, the importance of community and more with Miwa Messer, host of Poured Over."]

Benton, Michael D. "The Power of Stories." The Ryan Watts Life Coaching Podcast (September 4, 2023) ["Great conversation about the psychology of our personal narratives and beyond. Michael Benton is an associate professor of humanities and film studies at Bluegrass Community and technical College in Lexington, Kentucky. Narrative Psychology focuses on how we perceive the events of our lives through stories. One of the most powerful ways we can experience transformation is by changing our stories. This can be done in many ways."]

Costs of War (A website from The Watson School of International and Public Affairs) [Summaries of the information/data from recent reports - links go to the reports:
"The U.S. has spent $260 billion a year countering China militarily since 2012, following then-President Obama's "pivot to Asia". Anti-Asian and anti-Chinese American racism has intensified along with the militarized U.S.-China rivalry.
In the two years since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, the U.S. government has spent $21.7 billion on military aid to Israel.
The U.S. has spent an additional $9.65 – $12.07 billion on military operations in Yemen and the wider region since October 7, 2023, for a total of $31.35 – $33.77 billion and counting in U.S. spending on the post-10/7 wars.
As of October 3, 2025, 67,075 people in Gaza have been killed and 169,430 people injured according to the Gaza Ministry of Health. These 236,505 casualties constitute more than 10% of the pre-war population in Gaza.
At least 5.27 million people have fled or been forced to leave their homes (as of early September 2025) in the post-Oct.7, 2023 wars in Gaza, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, and the West Bank. This total includes an estimated 1.85 million children under 18.
Military spending produces an average of 5 jobs per $1 million. The same investment in other sectors creates more employment - nearly 13 jobs in education, 9 in healthcare, and 7-8 in infrastructure and clean energy.
From 2020 to 2024, private firms received $2.4 trillion in contracts from the Pentagon, approximately 54% of the department’s discretionary spending of $4.4 trillion.
The expanding tools of political influence used by the arms industry include extensive lobbying, millions in campaign donations, the revolving door, funding think tanks, and involvement in government advisory committees.
U.S.-backed Israeli military operations since Oct. 7, 2023 will lead to far higher indirect death than direct death rates.
Over the course of the war in Afghanistan (2001-2021), 24% of U.S. women service members and 1.9% of men experienced sexual assault.
The “Military-Industrial Complex” is enmeshed with Silicon Valley. A growing portion of Pentagon spending goes to large tech firms.
War contributes significantly to climate change: The U.S. Defense Department is one of the world’s top greenhouse gas emitters.
Americans are inundated with cultural products that promote militarism – many of them influenced by the Pentagon. From movies to sporting events, the entertainment we consume normalizes war, reducing reflection about U.S. policy choices and their consequences."]

Crabapple, Molly. "The Bund: Fighting Fascism, Fighting Zionism." Know Your Enemy (April 10, 2026) ["In 1897, a small group of Jewish Marxists on the outskirts of the Russian empire founded the General Jewish Labour Bund. The Bundists were revolutionary socialists, unapologetic internationalists, champions of the Yiddish language, and implacable foes of nationalism of every stripe, including (especially) Zionism. Bundists helped found the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, organized militias to defend Jews against pogroms, fought on the frontlines of the 1905 and 1917 revolutions, fought fascists wherever they found them, and helped lead the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. The history of the Bund is largely forgotten today—in part because Bundists were such early and prescient critics of Zionism. As one of its leaders said in 1933, “If Jewish nationalism, as a general rule, is not bloodthirsty, this is only out of necessity, not virtue; if an appropriate opportunity arose, Jewish nationalism would show its sharp teeth and nails no less than the nationalisms of other nations.” Thankfully, Molly Crabapple spent the last seven years rediscovering the Bund’s fascinating history for her new book, Here Where We Live Is Our Country: The Story of the Jewish Bund. It was thrilling to have her on to discuss it. “For leftist Jews longing for resources within our own past for combating the Zionist death cult,” Crabapple says, “the Bund is a model.” Further Reading: Sam Adler-Bell, ‘For leftist Jews, the Bund is a model’: the radical history behind one of Europe’s biggest socialist movements, The Guardian (2026); Max Strasser, What Does Judaism Look Like Without Zionism? New York Times (2026)"]

Crandall, Chris, Erin Kearns and Muniba Saleem. "The Weight of Our Words." Hidden Brain (April 13, 2018) ["... we look at the language we use around race and religion, and what it says about the culture we live in."]

Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press, 2021. ["What happens when artificial intelligence saturates political life and depletes the planet? How is AI shaping our understanding of ourselves and our societies? Drawing on more than a decade of research, award‑winning scholar Kate Crawford reveals how AI is a technology of extraction: from the minerals drawn from the earth to the labor pulled from low-wage information workers to the data taken from every action and expression. Crawford reveals how this planetary network is fueling a shift toward undemocratic governance and increased inequity. Rather than taking a narrow focus on code and algorithms, Crawford offers us a material and political perspective on what it takes to make AI and how it centralizes power. This is an urgent account of what is at stake as technology companies use artificial intelligence to reshape the world."]

Craven, Jasper. "Veterans of Domestic Wars." The Baffler #51 (April 2020) ["On the home front, vets battle for decent health care."]

Eno, Brian.  "'What If' is the Enemy of Fascism." Team Human #365 (April 2026) ["What is art for? Rushkoff is joined by legendary musician and producer Brian Eno to explore the necessity of moving away from the certainty of victory and into the delight of surrender." Brian Eno's latest book is What Art Does: An Unfinished Theory: "Why do we need art? What Art Does is an invitation to explore this vital question. It is a chance to understand how art is made by all of us. How it creates communities, opens our worlds, and can transform us. Curious and playful, richly illustrated, full of ideas and life, it is an inspiring call to imagine a different future."]

Gershon, Livia. "The Real Antifa." JSTOR Daily (April 2, 2026) ["During its first year, the second Trump administration has frequently described a range of opposing forces as “Antifa,” which it has characterized as a domestic terrorist group. But as historian Nigel Copsey and sociologist Samuel Merrill explored during the first Trump administration, Antifa groups are not only small, locally organized, and unconnected to the Democratic Party or mainstream nonprofit groups, but also generally resistant to the use of violence except as a limited, defensive tactic."]

Goldin, Hana Lee.  "The Libraries That Weren't Supposed to Exist - Basement libraries and buried archives: a brief history of reading against the state." Card Catalog (April 23, 2026)  ["Underground libraries are still being built. In the United States, PEN America has documented nearly twenty-three thousand instances of school book bans since 2021, concentrated largely in Florida and Texas, and reports from affected districts describe informal lending networks forming among parents and students to keep removed titles in circulation. In Ukraine, librarians have evacuated and hidden collections during the Russian invasion. In Afghanistan, underground schools have continued teaching girls since the Taliban banned their education in 2021. Each of these cases traces the same arc the earlier ones did: a restriction is imposed, and a group of readers decides the loss is not acceptable and finds a way to keep access available. The same four kinds of information control that authoritarian regimes apply deliberately also occur in democracies, produced by different mechanisms but with overlapping effects. Restriction in a democracy is rarely outright prohibition; it shows up as the steady removal of titles from school and library collections, licensing and liability pressure on publishers, and content removals across platforms. Distortion in a democracy isn’t state propaganda; it’s the combination of algorithmically amplified content and coordinated disinformation campaigns that erodes the shared factual ground a news ecosystem requires to function. Surveillance in a democracy is conducted mostly by private companies rather than the state, but the data collected on reading habits and search histories changes what people are willing to look up. And the long-term narrowing of what people find it possible to think shows up as the consolidation of information access through a few corporate platforms, which decides, increasingly, what most people encounter at all. These pressures differ from outright authoritarianism in scale and mechanism, but they still affect what most people end up reading. Four practices drawn from underground libraries give readers ways to keep access to books and ideas stable if information channels should narrow. Each takes on a different angle of the narrowing, and together they form the basis of a reading life that holds up under institutional pressure."]

---. "Steel-Manning Can Be More Useful Than Fact-Checking." Card Catalog (April 14, 2026) ["We steel-man an opposing argument for one of two reasons: either to discover that the opposing position has merit we hadn’t recognized (which makes our own understanding more accurate), or to be able to argue our own position from a much stronger and more grounded place (because we’ve already engaged with the best the other side has to offer rather than the worst). Both of these outcomes make us better thinkers. Neither requires us to abandon our original view. There’s a practical test for whether a steel man has been done well: if we can restate the opposing position back to someone who holds it and they respond with something like, “Yes, that’s what I believe,” then we’ve succeeded. We’ve demonstrated that we understand their position on its own terms, not a distorted or simplified version of the position. Once we’ve reached that point of genuine understanding, the conversation changes. We know exactly which specific points we disagree on and which points the other side has right, which means we can focus our pushback on the real points of divergence instead of wasting energy on misunderstandings. And the person we’re engaging with is far more likely to listen to our counterarguments, because we’ve shown that we took the time to understand theirs first. Steel-manning someone’s position doesn’t mean we’ve conceded anything. It means we’ve done the intellectual work of comprehending why they believe what they believe, so that if we still disagree, our disagreement is precise and informed rather than reactive. We’re not meeting them halfway; we’re making sure we know exactly where the halfway point is before we decide where we stand."]

---.  "We Were Never Supposed to Know This Much: On the cost of knowing everything, everywhere, all at once." Card Catalog (March 17, 2026)  ["In 1992, the British anthropologist Robin Dunbar published research connecting primate brain size to social group size. What he found was striking: the human neocortex is sized for a stable social world roughly the size of a village, intimate enough that we can track the histories, alliances, and emotional states of everyone in it. Beyond that scale, the cognitive architecture starts to strain. We were simply never built to hold more. For most of human history, that was more than enough. We lived in communities where bad news had edges: a neighbor’s illness, a failed harvest, a conflict close enough to matter and local enough to address. The information environment was scaled to what a human nervous system could hold, process, and respond to in a meaningful way. Bad news came with a corresponding set of possible actions. Knowing about a problem and having some capacity to do something about it were rarely that far apart. What’s happened since is not just a change in the volume of information, but a structural rupture in that relationship between knowing and doing. The internet didn’t simply give us more news. It collapsed every geographical and temporal boundary that had previously kept information at a manageable human scale. We now receive, in a single morning, detailed accounts of suffering from dozens of countries, political crises on multiple continents, and a running feed of expert opinion about all of it, alongside advertisements and the hot takes of strangers. All of it is real and all of it deserves moral seriousness. The brain receiving it, though, is the same one that evolved for a village, and it’s being asked to perform as a global news desk, a grief counselor, and a political analyst simultaneously. There’s also a subtler problem: the feed isn’t a mirror of the world. It’s a distortion. Research consistently shows that engagement-based algorithms amplify emotionally charged content, particularly anger and outrage, over content that is neutral or resolution-focused. A story about a crisis keeps us scrolling longer than a story about a resolution. The world as it appears in our feeds isn’t proportional to the world as it exists. It’s been filtered through an optimization function that rewards activation, which means we’re not just receiving more information than we were built for. We’re receiving a skewed version of it."]

Harlan, Jan. "2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY — Stanley Kubrick finds heavenly music on vinyl ." MUBI Podcast (May 7, 2026) ["Stanley Kubrick decided to score his sci-fi spectacular 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY with classical tracks — something he did against the advice of just about everybody, and to the detriment of at least two composers’ mental and physical health. Guests include Kubrick’s longtime executive producer Jan Harlan."]

Johnson, David. "Terence McKenna and the Problem of Enchantment." The Observing I (April 21, 2026) ["There are certain figures who stay with us not because they were entirely right, but because they gave language to something we were already feeling. Terence McKenna was one of those figures. He continues to exist in the cultural imagination because he seemed to speak directly to a part of the human being that modern life does not know what to do with. The part that resists reduction. The part that feels, often quietly, that the ordinary story we are given about reality is somehow too small. Too flat. Too dead. The part that suspects consciousness is stranger than we are told, that meaning is deeper than utility, and that the world may still contain forms of mystery that our institutions have forgotten how to name. He didn’t speak like an academic, but he didn’t speak like a conventional spiritual teacher either. He sounded like someone standing at the edge of the known world and sending back his field notes. About mushrooms. About language. About time. About shamanism. About the collapse of modernity. About the possibility that consciousness was not a side effect of matter, but something far more central and participatory than our dominant culture was willing to admit. And whether you agreed with him or not, there was something undeniably alive in that voice."]

Like Stories of Old. "The Story That Changed How I see the Meaning of Life." (Posted on Youtube: April 30, 2026) ["About 2 years ago, I was reading Cormac McCarthy's The Crossing when I came across a tale about a heretic, a priest, and the meaning of life that stopped me dead in my tracks, and that I've been trying to untangle ever since. This is that story. Films featured: Train Dreams, First Reformed, Winter Light, The Tree of Life, Silence, A Hidden Life, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford & To the Wonder."]

Martin, Stephen L. "Natural Arches of Kentucky." Kentucky Geological Survey (July 23, 2026) ["This story map is an interactive adaptation of the Kentucky Geological Survey pamphlet "Natural Arches of Kentucky.""]

Marx, Paris. "Data Vampires: Sacrificing for AI." Tech Won't Save Us (October 21, 2024) ["Sam Altman is clear: he’s ready to sacrifice anything for his AI fantasies. But are we? We dig into why generative AI has such extreme energy demands and how major tech companies are trying to rewrite climate accounting rules to cover how much their emissions are rising. AI isn’t just churning out visual slop; it’s also being used to transform how our society works and further reduce people’s power over their lives. It’s a disaster any way you look at it. This is episode 3 of Data Vampires, a special four-part series from Tech Won’t Save Us."]

Mendelsohn, Daniel. "Christopher Nolan's Odyssey." Open Source (August 6, 2026) ["We’re at sea this time on our own Odyssey, a voyage between the ancient epic that refuses to die and Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster movie version for us in this summer of 2026. It’s the story of course we all half-know about the wily old Greek warrior-king coming home ten years late from a horrible war against Troy, in maybe 1200 BC. Nobody knows the grip of it all better than our guest Daniel Mendelsohn, who sailed the route Odysseus took with his 81-year-old father and made an intimate mission of family discovery in it. He’s published his own translation of Homer’s whole poem, and now he’s reviewing this summer’s big movie for the New York Review of Books."]

Pollan, Michael. "On Consciousness." World in Time (June 26, 2026) ["“We have language. That’s the best tool we have for understanding the consciousness of another,” says Michael Pollan on this week’s episode of The World in Time. “You can go pretty far with it, as Proust himself showed, but that is, in the end, the function of art: to translate one consciousness into another. That’s the only way we know how to do it right now, and it’s pretty powerful, but there’s still a remnant, some residue that can never be translated. Even Proust, who wrote millions of words and was a great believer in the power of words, said consciousness is not a verbal construction. He didn’t think that consciousness was made of words. The visual arts can tell us things, too. A Rothko painting conveys so much consciousness. That’s the importance of art—helping to ferry us from one island of consciousness to another.” This week on the podcast, Donovan Hohn speaks with Michael Pollan, award-winning author and journalist, about his new book A World Appears: A Journey into Consciousness, in which Pollan explores one of our most complex and enduring mysteries: the “hard problem” of consciousness. Initially, he seeks the headwaters of consciousness in neuroscience, computer science, and in science that bridges computers and biology, but, midway through the book, and midway through this episode, suspecting that “third-person” science might be inadequate to the mystery, he looks elsewhere—to philosophy, literary history, the arts, and, as his journey ends, to Buddhism."]

Prentice, Deborah and Robb Willer. "Pluralistic Ignorance: The psychology behind why people defend the norms they secretly despise." You Are Not So Smart #181 (July 30, 2020) ["The false belief that the majority supports an unpopular norm slows down the process of ending it and sways policy makers, employers, advertisers, and the rest of society to act as though they live in a world that isn’t really there. And When change is on the horizon, pluralistic ignorance keeps people on the fringe, the sort of people whose beliefs and attitudes will be phased out by that change, clinging to their outdated worldviews for longer than they would otherwise. It also keeps their opponents feeling less supported than they truly are while pushing people in the middle to favor the status quo. In the end, a make-believe status quo changes the way everyone acts and thinks. As sociologists Hubert J. O’Gorman and Stephen L. Garry once put it, in situations like these, people often “unintentionally serve as cultural carriers of cognitive error.” Pluralistic ignorance has been blamed for everything from excessive drinking on college campuses to the persistence of racial segregation well into the 1970s. So, how do you deal with such a strange and mind-twisting phenomenon? Well, for some norms, the solution is simple, though it can take a lot of organization and effort. You must ask everyone what they really think and feel, and then you broadcast that to everyone in some way. You must make the private public. You must make it safe to say what is really on your mind — or you simply reveal that it was safe to do so all along. Many scientists bring up the parable of “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In the story by Hans Christian Andersen, a vain emperor hires two tailors who tell him they’ve made a suit of clothes so fine that it appears invisible to people who are unfit for their job or are very dumb. The trick, of course, is that the tailors haven’t made anything at all. All the emperor’s lackeys and subjects act as if his clothes were beautiful and amazing out of fear of appearing stupid or unfit, until finally a child points out that the emperor is walking around naked. At that point, everyone sighs in relief and feels safe to say what they were thinking all along. Stories with similar plots go back to antiquity, so the idea has been with us for a long time. The takeaway is usually: if someone has the courage to speak up, then the spell will be broken."]

Robinson, Rebekah. "Animal Rights Activists Target Wisconsin Facility Accused of Breeding Dogs for Medical Experiments." Democracy Now (April 20, 2026) ["Police fired tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets at hundreds of animal rights activists in Wisconsin on Saturday as they attempted to rescue about 2,000 dogs from a facility that breeds beagles for medical experimentation. The crackdown by Dane County sheriff’s deputies left scores of activists injured; 25 people were arrested. Protesters were attempting to enter a property owned by Ridglan Farms, which agreed last fall to surrender its state breeding license and stop selling dogs to other laboratories by July 1 as part of a deal to avoid prosecution on animal mistreatment charges. A state judge found Ridglan Farms likely broke Wisconsin animal cruelty laws by housing beagles in brutal conditions, performing surgeries without anesthesia, and leaving wounds untreated, along with other violations. The protesters who participated in Saturday’s action were “teachers, veterinarians, students, software engineers,” says Rebekah Robinson, a Wisconsin resident and longtime animal rights activist who was arrested during the action. “These were ordinary citizens who were trying to help these Ridglan dogs, to go in and take them to safety, get them the veterinary care that they needed. And what we were met with was overwhelming police brutality.”"]

Scheiber, Noam. "Radical Politics Inevitable as College Grads Screwed." Breaking Points (April 17, 2026) [A discussion of his book Mutiny: The Rise and Revolt of the College-Educated Working Class: "In recent years, young college grads have faced an alarming reality: crushing debt, unemployment, and jobs below their qualifications. They are frustrated that the time and money they invested in a degree have failed to bring about the opportunities they were promised. The anger of this college-educated working class began to boil over during the Covid pandemic, when workers at companies like Apple and Starbucks shocked corporate America by voting to unionize. Not long after, the veteran New York Times reporter Noam Scheiber met Chaya Barrett, an astute college grad and eight-year Apple employee who had helped organize her coworkers at an Apple store near Baltimore. While following Barrett and her cohort as their seemingly spontaneous rebellions spread far and wide—from college-educated workers at Apple stores and Starbucks cafés, through video-game studios, and even to Hollywood writers’ rooms—Scheiber realized he was witnessing something deep and lasting. Mutiny is the revelatory account of a generation made confident by their historic educational achievements, only to become disillusioned when their degrees yielded far less than they were taught to expect. With striking empathy, Scheiber paints a vivid portrait of this new working class while telling the dramatic story of its revolt against the status quo. He describes how recent developments like the proliferation of artificial intelligence and the war in Gaza have further fueled its discontent, and he explains why the college-educated working class will continue to demand change in the workplace, in cities like New York, and in national politics for years to come."]

Scottl, Jordan Florillo. "Energy and Desire: The Jungian Libido." Psychology Today (September 9, 2024) ["Jung used the word libido to describe the psychic energy, life force, or passion that drives us forward. This concept is called chi, qi, prana, and manna in other traditions. It includes sexual appetites, of course, but also our instinctive creative, intellectual, and spiritual growth trajectories. Kelly McGannon, writing for the Jung Society of Washington, summarizes Jung’s concept of libido in this way: "This energy, which moves through all of life, is like water… It has a “natural penchant” and crackles with its own intelligence—it wants what it wants. You can’t will it to move or force it to take a particular direction… This energy acts fastidiously, insistent upon the fulfillment of its own conditions.”"]

Vallor, Shannon. "The History of Bad Ideas: Value-Free Tech." Past Present Future (July 6, 2025) ["For today’s episode in the history of bad ideas David talks to philosopher Shannon Vallor about the myth that technology can be value free. It’s easy to see why Silicon Valley is so keen on the idea that it’s never the fault of the tech, only of the people who use it. But why do we let them get away with it? Where did this idea come from? How has it also poisoned arguments about gun laws and nuclear weapons? And what can we do to fight it and try to get technology that works with – not against – basic human values?"]

West, Stephen. "The Rival Moral Approaches of the Modern World - Alasdair Macintyre." Philosophize This! #245 (April 12, 2026) ["Today we talk about the book Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry by Alasdair Macintyre. We talk about each of the different sets of assumptions people bring to moral debates that often contain the true location of the disagreement."]




Wednesday, August 12, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #11

"The task of the right eye is to peer into the telescope, while the left eye peers into the microscope. To possess a telescope without its other essential half - the microscope - seems to me a symbol of the darkest incomprehension." - Surrealist artist Leonora Carrington (1917 - 2011)

--------------------------------------------------------

Benjamin, Ruha. "The New Artificial Intelligentsia."  Los Angeles Review of Books (October 18, 2024)  ["Behind this duplicity lies a familiar calculus: if AI evangelists can convince us that AGI is possible, imminent, and dangerous, we might be compelled to entrust our fate to them. Hype and doom, in other words, are two sides of the same (bit)coin. “AI safety” principles, teams, and initiatives are proliferating in part to hoard power and resources and, ultimately, to engineer the future in their own image. The aim: To lull us into acquiescence so that they can carry on business as usual. I have analyzed elsewhere the harmful impacts of AI. In the rest of this essay, I focus on AI’s insidious inputs—the eugenic values and logics of those who create these systems, cloaking them in the rhetoric of salvation. Breathless buzzwords like “efficiency,” “novelty,” and “productivity” conceal a self-serving vision: the future imagined by AI evangelists is meant only for a small sliver of humanity. The rest of us will be left clamoring to survive on a boiling planet. Take the autonomous weapons systems raining hell on Palestinians—why else give them saccharine-sounding names like Lavender and the Gospel if not to make these deadly inventions seem benevolent? If we listen carefully to the good word of tech evangelists, we can hear the groans of those buried under the rubble of progress. Many of the same people behind the technologies wreaking havoc today—workplace algorithms intensifying the pace of work, facial recognition software leading to false arrests, automated triage systems rationing quality healthcare, and “smart” weapons ripping through flesh with a click—also brand themselves as humanity’s saviors. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos pronounced that “it is a golden age. […] We are now solving problems with machine learning and artificial intelligence that were … in the realm of science fiction for the last several decades.” In a 2015 essay for an interfaith magazine, PayPal and surveillance tech firm Palantir Technologies co-founder Peter Thiel argued, Science and technology are natural allies to this Judeo-Western optimism, especially if we remain open to an eschatological frame in which God works through us in building the kingdom of heaven today, here on Earth—in which the kingdom of heaven is both a future reality and something partially achievable in the present. Likewise, the home page of Singularity University, a company founded by Ray Kurzweil and Peter Diamandis, affirms the organization’s belief that “technology and entrepreneurship can solve the world’s greatest challenges.” As a group, the artificial intelligentsia promises to guide us into the Future™, positioning themselves as Guardians of the Galaxy, even as they engineer the crises against which we must guard."]

Benton, Michael D. "Introduction and Discussion of The Battle of Algiers." Dialogic Cinephilia (April 5, 2026) [In 1966 Gillo Pontecorvo’s film The Battle of Algiers was released to critical acclaim as well as official condemnation. In France it was banned until 1974 when it was finally screened in a cut version. The film examines the early part of what is known as the Algerian War (1954-1962) when the colonized Algerian population threw off the century-long yoke of the French colonizers (they invaded Algeria in 1830). Pontecorvo’s film is unique in many ways.]

Chungyalpa, Dekila."On the Sacred Feminine and the Living Earth." Wonder Cabinet (April 11, 2026) ["Imagine growing up believing that at the heart of existence is a Primordial Mother—and that She is the Earth. For Dekila Chungyalpa, that idea is not metaphor. It’s inheritance. In Tibetan Buddhism, the feminine divine appears as Prajnaparamita, or Yum Chenmo—the “Mother of All Buddhas.” As the daughter and granddaughter of nuns, Dekila was raised in a world where spiritual teaching and healing was often female, and where land itself—especially the sacred Himalayan landscape of Sikkim—was alive with presence, meaning, and obligation. Today, she is a global conservationist and founding director of the Loka Initiative, building unlikely partnerships between climate scientists and religious leaders across traditions—from Buddhist monastics to Catholic clergy, Indigenous elders to Muslim clerics and Evangelical pastors. Her work suggests that the climate crisis is not only scientific or political—but spiritual."]

Crabapple, Molly. "The History of the Jewish Bund." American Prestige (August 12, 2026) ["Danny and Derek speak with artist and writer Molly Crabapple about her book on the history of the Jewish Labor Bund, Here Where We Live Is Our Country. They discuss Molly's personal connection to the story, the Pale of Settlement and Jewish emancipation, the founding of the Bund in 1897, the Bund's armed self-defense against pogroms, its fraught relationship with Lenin and the Bolsheviks, the Bund's rivalry with Zionism, the flourishing of Bundist culture in interwar Poland, and the lessons of the Bund’s story for the Jewish left today."]

Davies, Jr., Akinola. "My Father's Shadow — Akinola Davies Jr. dreams of 90s Nigeria." MUBI (April 9, 2026) ["Akinola Davies Jr. never really knew his dad. But in MY FATHER’S SHADOW, his BAFTA-winning debut feature set in 90s Nigeria, the director imagines what it would be like to spend the day with him. Akinola tells guest host Simran Hans how he recreated his own hazy childhood memories, and about his ingenious methods for getting a pair of remarkable performances from two young kids who had never acted on screen before."]

Gilman, Nils. "How To Future-Proof Your Career In The Age Of AI." NOEMA (April 9, 2026) ["The most prized workers will be those who can decode a sea of outputs, spot the meaningful signal and translate it into action that others understand and trust."]

Goldin, Hanna Lee. "The Atlas of Learning." Card Catalog (August 11, 2026) ["A librarian’s map of where knowledge lives, and how to find our way through the research world."]

---. "From Ataris to AI: The Millennial Reckoning With Relentless Change." Card Catalog (March 3, 2026) ["This isn’t a single adjustment. It’s been the continuous condition of our entire adult lives. We didn’t watch the world change and then settle. We watched the world change, adapted to that change, and then watched it change again before the adaptation had even fully landed. We grew up inside the acceleration, and the acceleration has never stopped. On one side of us: an older generation that experienced technology largely as a series of arriving conveniences, things that made existing tasks easier rather than as the ground beneath their feet constantly shifting. On the other: a generation behind us for whom the internet isn’t a place you go but simply the texture of existence, who have no memory of a world that worked differently. We are the bridge generation: old enough to remember before, young enough to be living through the middle, and bearing the particular exhaustion of people who can see both shores but can’t quite stand on either."]

---. "In Praise of Serendipity." Card Catalog (April 2, 2026) ["On staying open to the unexpected: We teach search as technique: how to construct a query, which databases to use, how to evaluate a source. What we don’t teach is the limit built into all of those tools: they can only return what we already know to ask for. Everything we don’t know to ask for requires a different approach entirely. AI extends that limit further. A language model synthesizes from what we’ve already thought to ask about, which means it’s only as generative as the questions we bring to it. Some of the most generative questions arrive through wandering, through the accidental encounter that reframes what we thought we were looking for, and that’s something current AI tools aren’t designed to do. The library tradition has long understood that knowledge develops through exposure to the unexpected and through the slow accumulation of encounters that couldn't have been planned. Following a thread without knowing where it leads is how the connections start to form on their own. The practices above aren’t a romantic supplement to serious research. They’re part of how serious research has always developed. Serendipity has a research literature and a documented role in how knowledge develops. But the reason any of that matters is simpler: the world occasionally offers something we didn't know we needed, arriving from a direction we never would have thought to look. We stumble into it less than we used to, but it's still there when we make room for it."]

---. "What 'Do Your Own Research' Actually Means." Card Catalog (April 7, 2026) ["A step-by-step methodology for evaluating any claim and exploring any subject."]

Goodman, Amy. "How Media Silences Anti-War Voices." Current Affairs (April 12, 2026) ["Amy Goodman is the longtime host of Democracy Now!, the independent news program she helped launch 30 years ago, which has since grown from a small network of community radio stations into a global media institution. She spoke to Current Affairs Editor-in-Chief Nathan Robinson and Digital Editor John Ross, alongside filmmakers Carl Deal and Tia Lessin, about the new documentary Steal This Story, Please!, which traces the history of Democracy Now! and Goodman’s career in independent journalism." What makes Democracy Now! different from corporate media. Amy Goodman’s approach to journalism. How antiwar voices get sidelined in corporate media. Who corporate media really serves. Objectivity vs. taking a stance. What Democracy Now! adds to the historical record.]

Hapootlian, Amanda. "How One Playwright is Using Theatre to Expose the Surveillance State." ACLU (March 26, 2026) ["As the ACLU fights to protect people’s privacy, playwright Matthew Libby discusses his play about the private companies fueling the government’s surveillance of immigrants. ... Without safeguards, federal agencies will continue to exploit their partnerships with tech companies to sow fear and violate our rights, which is why the ACLU is advocating for Congress to pass legislation that would protect our privacy in the digital age. These bills include the ICE Out of Our Faces Act, which would ban ICE and other immigration agencies from buying, acquiring, or using facial recognition software and the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a bipartisan bill that would ban the government from buying our data from Palantir and other companies without a warrant. ... Matthew Libby, the creator of a new off-Broadway play called “DATA,” is using theater to fight against the surveillance state. He became inspired to write the play after seeing how Big Tech companies are used to supercharge President Trump’s deportation agenda. Below, we discuss how “DATA” pushes back against public-private surveillance partnerships, and how we should all speak out against this obscene government overreach."]

 Horgan, John. "Do Voters Adore Trump Because They Dread Death?: “Terror Management” Theorist Sheldon Solomon Explains How Subliminal Fear of Death Can Affect Us on a Personal and Political Level." Scientific American (June 6, 2016) [An interview with the psychologist co-author of the book The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life (Random House, 2015): "A transformative, fascinating theory--based on robust and groundbreaking experimental research--reveals how our unconscious fear of death powers almost everything we do, shining a light on the hidden motives that drive human behavior. More than one hundred years ago, the American philosopher William James dubbed the knowledge that we must die "the worm at the core" of the human condition. In 1974, cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker won the Pulitzer Prize for his book The Denial of Death, arguing that the terror of death has a pervasive effect on human affairs. Now authors Sheldon Solomon, Jeff Greenberg, and Tom Pyszczynski clarify with wide-ranging evidence the many ways the worm at the core guides our thoughts and actions, from the great art we create to the devastating wars we wage. The Worm at the Core is the product of twenty-five years of in-depth research. Drawing from innovative experiments conducted around the globe, Solomon, Greenberg, and Pyszczynski show conclusively that the fear of death and the desire to transcend it inspire us to buy expensive cars, crave fame, put our health at risk, and disguise our animal nature. The fear of death can also prompt judges to dole out harsher punishments, make children react negatively to people different from themselves, and inflame intolerance and violence. But the worm at the core need not consume us. Emerging from their research is a unique and compelling approach to these deeply existential issues: terror management theory. TMT proposes that human culture infuses our lives with order, stability, significance, and purpose, and these anchors enable us to function moment to moment without becoming overwhelmed by the knowledge of our ultimate fate. The authors immerse us in a new way of understanding human evolution, child development, history, religion, art, science, mental health, war, and politics in the twenty-first century. In so doing, they also reveal how we can better come to terms with death and learn to lead lives of courage, creativity, and compassion. Written in an accessible, jargon-free style, The Worm at the Core offers a compelling new paradigm for understanding the choices we make in life--and a pathway toward divesting ourselves of the cultural and personal illusions that keep us from accepting the end that awaits us all."]

Johnson, David. "Monks, Mystics, and Madmen." The Observing I #102 (February 23, 2025) ["Have you ever tried sitting in complete silence with nothing but your own thoughts? No phone. No music. No distractions. Just you. If that idea makes you uncomfortable, you’re not alone, and that’s exactly the problem.In this episode of The Observing I, we dive deep into the lost art of solitude - why being alone has become something we fear, how history’s greatest thinkers and mystics embraced isolation, and how modern life is engineered to keep you constantly distracted. And if you think this is just another self-improvement gimmick, think again - because at the end of this episode, I’m challenging you to something radical: 24 hours without screens, without social media, without external input. Just you, alone, facing your own mind. Most people won’t do it.The question is: Will you?"]

Johnson, M. Sellers. "Americana Anderson: Nested Narratives in Asteroid City." Off Screen 30.2/3 (March 2026) ["Asteroid City is at once a familiar and a more daring Anderson film. Its general acclaim and eager expectations are reflected in its early reviews, as well as its nomination for the Palme d’Or this year (a third return for Anderson, following Cannes’ top prize considerations for The French Dispatch in 2021 and Moonrise Kingdom in 2012). The film certainly postures time-honored Anderson themes—unconventional families forging eclectic communities, solitary people sublimating their feelings of loneliness into comradery, and poetic gestures toward the unknown—but does Asteroid City’s quality of emotionality equate with its quality of style? While his works often are conceptually fantastic, it would appear in recent years that the artificial style that he has long been celebrated for now overwhelms his dramatic execution. However, instead of evaluating the film as a stand-alone project, perhaps it is best to gauge Asteroid City in the larger canon of Anderson’s projects. The film is certainly visually stunning and delightfully wry, as one might expect, but how does Asteroid City measure up in the larger scope of Anderson’s filmography?"]

Martin, Laura J. "The War on Weeds." NOEMA (May 14, 2024) ["Pesticides and herbicides made from fossil fuels that are freely available to unwitting consumers poison our land, our bodies and life all around."]

Merchant, Brian.   "It's open season for refusing AI: There's been a wave of successful efforts to ban, reject and shut down AI."  Blood In the Machine (April 3, 2026) ["In a November conversation at the Urban Consulate in Detroit, the great writer and thinker Tressie McMillan Cottom was asked by host Orlando P. Bailey, “Do you have a daring idea for us to ponder and sit with for our collective future?” McMillan Cottom replied with this: “When people try to sell you on the idea that the future is already settled, it’s because it is deeply unsettled. I think that this promise of an artificial intelligent future is really just a collective anxiety that very wealthy, powerful people have about how well they’re gonna be able to control us in the future. If they can get us to accept that the future is already settled—AI is already here, the end is already here—then we will create that for them. My most daring idea is to refuse."]

Moor, Robert. "On Trees." The World in Time (April 10, 2026) ["“The tree is this living skin wrapped around a dead core,” says Robert Moor on this week’s episode of The World in Time. “You have this skin of living wood that’s being produced by the cambium, and it’s growing outward and inward simultaneously. Like a series of matryoshka dolls, each layer is encased within the next over time, which is why trees continue thickening. And that also leads to this mechanism I call gnarling: trees lock their errors in place. If a tree takes a strange turn, it can’t straighten out its wood. There are ways in which our lives are like that as well. We can’t choose to fix our past mistakes. We have to learn to grow beyond the past rather than hoping to travel back in time to make it something different.” This week on the podcast, Donovan Hohn speaks with journalist and essayist Robert Moor, author of In Trees: An Exploration, a follow-up and companion to Moor’s bestselling debut, On Trails, published in 2016. Their conversation—like Moor’s book—branches, and roots, and gnarls. We meet the neuroscientists researching the arborescence of the human brain, a tree-climbing expert in the Lake District of England, a renowned Japanese bonsai artist, a master Korowai woodsman living in a tree house in Papua New Guinea, and while considering the leafy, treetop nests of chimpanzees, Moor and Hohn explore the deep, distant evolutionary history of humanity’s relationship to trees."]

Rubsam, Robert. "America's Cinematic Salvation." Liberties (March 2026) ["Coiled at the center of Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another is a shadowy club committed to the “racial purification” of the American populace. Meeting in luxury hotel suites and bland office towers, these lumpy, balding men — generals, politicians, titans of industry — want to rebalance the composition of their country, and possibly the world. They call themselves the Christmas Adventurers, and they profess a creed of strict racial hygiene, inducting only “white Americans by Gentile-born,” in the hope of segregating white Americans away from the refuse of the worldwide underclass. “You want to save the planet,” says head Adventurer Virgil Throckmorton (Tony Goldwyn), “you start with immigration.” Does that sound so farfetched to you? Based on a Thomas Pynchon novel published in 1990, first conceived around the turn of the 21st century, and filmed entirely before the 2024 general election, Anderson’s film arrived in theaters last fall at a time when immigration had become the battlefield on which all of America’s domestic conflicts are being fought. In the past year, the president has signed an executive order illegally ending birthright citizenship, and has openly yearned to denaturalize, deport, and even detain abroad U.S. citizens. “Homegrowns,” he said last year, “are next.” These policies have been backed up and egged-on by a coterie of American white nationalists, among them Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller and Vice President J.D. Vance, who believe that America’s “cultural coherence,” established by early generations of white Anglo-Saxon immigrants, has been fatally compromised by nearly 150 years of immigration from places all across the globe. The only real Americans, they believe, are the descendants of those early settlers, a group now called “Heritage Americans.” Everyone else is, at best, a second-class citizen — though, given the pitch of their ethnonationalist rhetoric, invader would probably be the more accurate term. Miller apparently believes the country would be better off with about 100 million residents — a task that would involve removing more than 240 million people. "]

Singh, Manvir. "Was Shamanism the First Religion?" Wonder Cabinet (April 4, 2026) ["Shamanism may be humanity’s oldest religion – a tradition found across cultures, where healers slip into unseen realms, speak with spirits, and bring back knowledge from beyond the visible world. But in a modern, scientific age, these practices can seem like little more than superstition. But what if they reveal something deeper in human experience? Anthropologist Manvir Singh set out in search of answers. On a remote island in Indonesia, he lived with the Mentawai people, watching as their shamans — the sikerie — drummed, danced and entered trance, their tattooed bodies painted in turmeric. In these altered states, they appeared to move between worlds. How does an empirically-minded scientist make sense of such experiences? Singh combines immersive fieldwork with cross-cultural research into shamanic traditions, past and present. He calls shamanism a “timeless religion,” one that may go back to our earliest ancestors — and still lives on in the world’s major religions. Along the way, he asks a provocative question: Was Jesus a shaman?"]

Topping, Emily. "Why America is Obsessed with Protein (And War)." Current Affairs (March 26, 2026) ["The wave of high-protein everything shows a country trying to eat its way out of weakness."]

Velocci, Beans. "Sex Isn't Real: The Invention of an Incoherent Binary." New Books in LGBTQ+ Studies (April 11, 2026) ["In Sex Isn’t Real: The Invention of an Incoherent Binary (Duke UP, 2026), Beans Velocci traces the history of current high stakes attempts to define sex and to create a world devoid of trans life. Drawing on lab notes, family genealogies, medical case studies, and more, Velocci follows scientists and clinicians from the mid-nineteenth through the mid-twentieth century and across five disciplines—zoology, eugenics, gynecology, statistical sexology, and transsexual medicine—as their ideas and practices created a definitional tangle. They demonstrate how the sorting of bodies into male and female persists not despite but because of sex’s incoherence: the defining features of these categories shift to contain various understandings of anatomy and physiology, theories of race, developments in research and medical methodologies, and bodies that cannot be accounted for in a binary framework. Exposing the endless work required to produce a world in which most people have a binary gender identity that neatly fits their binarily sexed body, Velocci demonstrates that it is not cis people who fit the categories; it’s the categories that flex to make them fit. Beans Velocci is Assistant Professor of History and Sociology of Science and Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies at the University of Pennsylvania."]

Walter, Damien. "The Matrix and the Archetypes of Carl Jung." Science Fiction (December 2021) ["There’s a question about The Matrix I’ve been asking myself since the franchise established itself in the collective unconscious of humanity back in the early 00s. What is Sigmund Freud doing in these movies?"]

Williams, Adrienne, Milagros Miceli, and Timnit Gebru. "The Exploited Labor Behind Artificial Intelligence." NOEMA (October 13, 2024) ["Tech companies that have branded themselves “AI first” depend on heavily surveilled gig workers like data labelers, delivery drivers and content moderators. Startups are even hiring people to impersonate AI systems like chatbots, due to the pressure by venture capitalists to incorporate so-called AI into their products. In fact, London-based venture capital firm MMC Ventures surveyed 2,830 AI startups in the EU and found that 40% of them didn’t use AI in a meaningful way. Far from the sophisticated, sentient machines portrayed in media and pop culture, so-called AI systems are fueled by millions of underpaid workers around the world, performing repetitive tasks under precarious labor conditions. And unlike the “AI researchers” paid six-figure salaries in Silicon Valley corporations, these exploited workers are often recruited out of impoverished populations and paid as little as $1.46/hour after tax. Yet despite this, labor exploitation is not central to the discourse surrounding the ethical development and deployment of AI systems. In this article, we give examples of the labor exploitation driving so-called AI systems and argue that supporting transnational worker organizing efforts should be a priority in discussions pertaining to AI ethics."]

Zimmerman, John.  "The President and the Universities."  Liberties (April 2026) ["What would it mean to reconstitute our universities around that goal? Several universities — including my own — are developing new core courses for first-year students that explore the history and the challenges of democratic government, alongside other fundamental themes in the humanities. Other schools have established programs around civic engagement and “dialogue across difference,” which has become something of a cliché at the Trump-era university. And sixty-one leaders of higher education — calling themselves College Presidents for Civic Preparedness — have partnered with the Institute for Citizens and Scholars (formerly the Woodrow Wilson Foundation) to create new classes and other campus initiatives to “prepare the next generation of well-informed, productively engaged, and committed citizens.” This is all fine and good — indeed, it is great — but it also feels a bit like our Centers for Teaching and Learning: if we embraced our civic purpose fully and honestly, we would not need to create special courses and initiatives to enhance it. Nor would we need separate schools of civic thought and leadership, which have sprouted at thirteen public universities in eight different Republican-dominated states. They aren’t just new programs or classes; they are full-fledged degree programs, with faculty lines and student majors and the other hallmarks of academic expansion. The GOP lawmakers who endowed them were not at all wrong about the lack of civic knowledge and engagement among our students. And neither are they wrong about the left-wing groupthink of the academy. But so long as the civics schools are coded politically red, they are destined to fail. The Trump administration recently announced a set of grants to promote civic education around this year’s momentous anniversary of the Declaration of Independence; priority will go to universities that have established “independent academic units dedicated to civic thought, Constitutional studies, American history, leadership, and economic liberty.” Get the picture? These American principles are now imagined as “conservative,” which subverts the shared civic purpose that the new schools purport to uphold. And we certainly will not revive that purpose by relying on artificial intelligence, the other shiny object of the modern academy. The nation’s largest university system, Cal State, recently inked a deal with Open A.I. to make it America’s “first and largest A.I.-empowered university.” It will embed AI tutors across the system’s twenty-two campuses and prepare its 460,000 students for “A.I.-driven careers,” whatever that means. The jury is very much out on whether AI can help students learn, instead of simply doing their homework for them. Yet it is safe to say, I think, that AI is unlikely to make them better citizens. Genuine citizenship requires people to deliberate their common fate with others. According to the report to Harry Truman in 1947, universities should teach “the practice as well as the theory of democracy.” Let us agree that the practice as well as the theory of democracy is more than a prompt to ChatGPT. Does anyone seriously think that a robot can enhance democratic citizenship? Shouldn’t we instead worry about it eroding our democratic capacities, by substituting a bot’s judgment for our own?"]


Monday, August 10, 2026

Mise en abyme - Music Mix #57

 Zero 7; Sophie Barker; TV on the Radio; FC Kahuna; Hafdis Huld; Portishead; Tame Impala; The Bangles; Gorillaz; Rush; Doom Gong; Black Sabbath; Frankie and the Witch Fingers; Routine Caffeine; Blond Cauldron; Cat Power; All Them Witches; Datarock; Orchestra Gold; Beth Hart; Slash; Eric Gales; Miles Kane; Andrew Bird; El Michels Affair; Roge; The Rolling Stones; Blue Oyster Cult; Taylor Swift; Miguel; Yazmin Lacey; SAULT; Hole; X-tal; A Tribe Called Quest; iLe; Os Mutantes; Mother Love Bone; Hether; Joyer; Joy Division; Soundgarden; Joelton Mayfield; The Wipers; The Smithereens; Nirvana


Mise en abyme - Music Mix #57

Sunday, August 9, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #10

"Informative doc that tackles AI from a lot of different angles—its connective tissue to eugenics and techno-fascism, the techbro quest for the whole grail artificial general intelligence, its incredible increasing drain on public resources, and issues that may come to fruition in the future." - Kevflix and Chill
Official description: "The AI origin story. The untold origins of artificial intelligence lie not in machines but in power, revealing the fantasies behind the hype that got us here and where we go next."





-----------------------------------------------

Leonor Carrington, the great Surrealist artist and writer:


----------------------------------------------------------------

"Books and all forms of writing have always been objects of terror to those who seek to suppress the truth." - Wole Soyinka, The Man Died (1972) Excerpt published in the journal Transitions (1997)

--------------------------------------------------

Bessler, John and Carol Steiker. "We The People: Cruel and Unusual Punishment." Throughline (January 23, 2025) ["The Eighth Amendment. What is cruel and unusual punishment? Who gets to define and decide its boundaries? And how did the Constitution's authors imagine it might change? Today on Throughline's We the People: the Eighth Amendment, the death penalty, and what cruel and unusual really means. John Bessler, law professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, and adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center. Author of The Death Penalty's Denial of Fundamental Human Rights.
Carol Steiker, law professor at Harvard Law School and author of Courting Death: the Supreme Court and Capital Punishment."]

Bessner, Daniel. "Imperialist Realism." This is Hell! (August 5, 2026) ["Historian and foreign policy analysis Daniel Bessner joins us to discuss his new book, Imperialist Realism: Politics and Culture at the End of the American Century: "Imperialist Realism explores how Americans have come to accept their global empire not because they believe in its righteousness but because they believe no alternative to U.S. hegemony is possible. Imperialist Realism is a collection of essays elucidating the titular concept, which centers on a single question: What does it feel like to live in a moment in which it is easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of the U.S. Empire? By analyzing the theory and practice of U.S. foreign policy, Imperialist Realism provides theoretical and empirical accounts of modern empire, liberalism, and global affairs. It combines pieces that explore everything from the ideas of individuals such as Barack Obama, George Soros, and Samantha Power to topics such as first-person shooters to issues such as left-wing foreign policy. In this way, Imperialist Realism examines the past, present, and future of U.S. foreign relations while drawing broader conclusions about the nature of empire in both its domestic and its international contexts."]

Castro, Collette de. "Consent Puzzles in the Oslo Stories Trilogy by Dag Johan Haugerud." Sense of Cinema #118 (July 2026) ["In France, Dreams, Sex and Love came out over three weeks in the summer of 2025. I was like a restless teenager in my discovery of these intricate, sustainable and secret worlds – breathlessly waiting until the next instalment for another revelation. To me, the triptych of films constitutes a utopian portrayal of consent in an ideal world, one in which consent is not based on power dynamics or gender and heterosexual norms but rather on desire and love. ... Perhaps this is why watching these films gave me the feeling I was a teenager again. The lack of film education about consent I was given back then was being remedied week after week watching these Norwegian films in which women had agency over their bodies and minds. I’m not saying they portray some kind of ideal consent model – the characters in them are flawed, human and struggling just as much as anyone. But the whole point is that there is never one answer. Consent is just a constant negotiation between actors in this play we call the world. The people in these films talk, and they talk – a lot – about what consent means to them, how they negotiate it in their own minds, and how other people’s limits can surprise them. In each film of the trilogy, a character is warned or questioned about crossing an invisible line. This comes up in a relationship between an employer and an employee; a student and a teacher; and a nurse and a patient. The characters all work out their consent puzzles on their own, without resorting to violence or institutional intervention. The careful consideration, exposure and eventual resolution of these consent puzzles is part of what makes these films so moving. They ask, how can one go into the dark woods of one’s desires without infringing on another’s freedom?"]

Carrasco, Salvador. "The Eternal Return: The Battle of Algiers at 60." Senses of Cinema #118 (July 2026) ["True to content-driven form, The Battle of Algiers has a nonlinear, circular structure that supports the metaphor of the eternal return applicable to colonialism, the resistance to it, and the consequences thereof. The film starts near the end of its chronological Act Three, in 1957 Algiers, the capital of a nation colonised by the French since 1830. The first spoken dialogue is a loaded question – “Couldn’t you have talked sooner?” – asked by a French soldier to an Algerian prisoner whom he and his army buddies have been torturing with a blowtorch, judging from the scorching scar on his chest. The question foreshadows the journey on which we’re about to embark. The Battle of Algiers is as much of a wakeup call as a film can be, as relevant now as when it first came out 60 years ago; as when it reemerged during the so-called War on Terror to help us realise that “terrorists” do not just happen overnight; and as in our present day, when the US and Israel have engaged in yet another unwinnable war, this time with Iran. As soon as it talks to us, The Battle of Algiers forces us to reassess our preconceptions of civilisation, morality, and freedom."]

Downes-Angus, John. "Time-Wasting, Truth-Wasting Exercises: Samuel Cohen’s anthology on book banning diagnoses a recent swell in censorship that’s problematic for more reasons than you’d think." Los Angeles Review of Books (March 9, 2026) ["On a citywide Zoom call with organizers in the United Federation of Teachers (the New York City teachers’ union), a chapter leader shared an organizing success story from her middle school. Her colleagues wanted to teach Lois Lowry’s The Giver (1993) to their seventh graders. The book is about a boy named Jonas who is chosen to inherit the pain, joy, and color of others, these memories kept from his society for the sake of maintaining stability. When realizing the injustice of this situation, Jonas saves them from their ignorance by returning the memories to them. It is a kid-friendly send-up of fascism, and the principal refused to allow teachers to teach Lowry’s book. Apparently, this book has been banned in the past because of its political commentary, its violence, its occasional sexual references, and its depiction of euthanasia. The principal took issue with none of these things. Instead, she objected to the fact that it is a book. The school had adopted a reading curriculum—HMH’s Into Reading—that excluded books in favor of test-aligned excerpts, so the principal argued that teachers could not teach any books at all. In past years, students had loved The Giver. And the teachers wanted to give the kids the experience of reading a novel like Lowry’s, so the chapter leader spearheaded collective action: they wore “Freedom to Read” shirts and other shirts associated with book bans, raised the issue up to the superintendent—and ultimately won. The kids read the book and loved it. I do not think this is what people think of when they think about book banning in the United States. But given the imperiled state of books and reading today, a more inclusive definition is desperately needed. People inclined to learn more about book banning should read University of Missouri English professor Samuel Cohen’s new edited volume Banning Books in America: Not a How-To. Cohen has put together a range of texts—essays, for the most part, but also an interview, an excerpt from a novel, and Cohen’s own syllabus for his course on banned books—that capture the titular subject in its many forms."]

Giordano, Sara. "Scientific objectivity is a myth – cultural values and beliefs always influence science and the people who do it." The Conversation (September 4, 2025) ["If removing all bias is impossible, then, how do people create knowledge that can be trusted? The understanding that all knowledge is created through cultural processes does allow for two or more differing truths to coexist. You see this reality in action around many of today’s most controversial subjects. However, this does not mean you must believe all truths equally – that’s called total cultural relativism. This perspective ignores the need for people to come to decisions together about truth and reality. Instead, critical scholars offer democratic processes for people to determine which values are important and for what purposes knowledge should be developed."]

Goldin, Hana Lee. "Google Has a Secret Reference Desk. Here's How to Use It." Card Catalog (February 24, 2026) ["40 Google features to find exactly what you need, the alternative search engines that do things Google won't, and the reference desk framework underneath all of it."]

---. "The Hierarchy of Sources: A Cheat Sheet - A guide to evaluating information sources in the AI age." Card Catalog (February 19, 2026) ["Why This Matters Now: The information environment you navigate today bears little resemblance to the one that existed a few decades ago. In the 1990s, getting your ideas in front of a large audience usually required convincing a publisher, a newspaper editor, a television producer, or some other institutional gatekeeper that your content was worth distributing. Those gatekeepers had biases and blind spots, and plenty of valuable perspectives were excluded from mainstream channels. But the friction involved in publishing meant that most widely circulated information had passed through at least one filter, however imperfect. That friction is gone. Anyone with an internet connection can now publish anything, to a potential audience of billions, at essentially zero cost. A teenager in their bedroom can create a website that looks as professional as a major news organization. A coordinated network can flood social media with fabricated stories faster than fact-checkers can respond. AI tools can generate plausible-sounding text, realistic images, and convincing audio and video at a scale that would have seemed like science fiction a decade ago. Meanwhile, the platforms that distribute this information have built their business models around engagement, which means their algorithms actively promote content that generates strong emotional reactions regardless of whether that content is accurate. Research has shown that false news stories tend to spread faster and reach more people than accurate ones, in part because fabricated content is often designed to provoke outrage or surprise. The economic incentives of the attention economy are misaligned with the goal of keeping people well-informed."]

---. "What a Librarian is Reading in Times of Moral Nausea and Psychological Despair." Card Catalog (February 17, 2026)  ["What do you do when the problem isn’t misinformation, but accurate information that shatters everything you thought possible? When you have to expand your conception of what humans are capable of doing to each other, what systems are capable of enabling, what societies are capable of tolerating? When the facts themselves demand that you build a larger, darker, more complex model of how power operates and who it serves? These books don’t answer that question; they can’t. But they do offer ways to live inside the question without being consumed by it. They model how others have metabolized unbearable knowledge and continued. They provide practices for days when continuing feels impossible. They remind us that we’re not the first people to discover the world is not what we thought, and we won’t be the last. They model what becomes possible when you stop asking “how do I unknow this” and start asking “who do I want to be now that I know.” Some things change us permanently. These books are companions for that transformation. They’re maps drawn by those who traveled this territory before us and discovered that continuing mattered more than understanding, that staying present had value even without resolution. They’re proof that others have stood where you’re standing and found ways forward, too."]

Haskell, David George. "Flowers and the Revolutionary Power of Beauty." Wonder Cabinet (March 28, 2026) ["What can flowers teach us about survival? Celebrated biologist and writer David George Haskell reframes flowers as agents of transformation—creatures that turned conflict into collaboration and remade the living world. For thousands of years, flowers have threaded themselves through human life—into our rituals, our art, our language, even our names. We decorate our homes and altars with them, distill their scents, celebrate them in poetry and song. But what if we’ve misunderstood them entirely? In How Flowers Made the World, biologist and writer David George Haskell invites us to see flowers not as delicate embellishments, but as one of the most powerful forces in Earth’s history. When flowering plants emerged more than 200 million years ago, they didn’t just adapt to the world—they transformed it. Through strategies of beauty, attraction, and reciprocity, they turned rivals into partners, reshaping ecosystems and making possible the rich diversity of life we know today. In a lyrical, science-rich conversation, we explore:
— Why Haskell calls flowers “nature’s revolutionaries”
— How beauty, pleasure, and desire function as evolutionary strategies
— The deep interdependence between flowers, animals, and humans
— What flowers can teach us about resilience in a time of ecological crisis
— How re-centering flowers might change the story we tell about life on Earth
We live on a floral planet, Haskell says—and more than that, we are a floral species, utterly dependent on flowering plants for food, habitat, and survival. The lessons flowers offer—about creativity, cooperation, and transformation—may be exactly what we need to navigate a rapidly changing world. What would it mean to tell the story of life not through predators and conquest, but through seduction, partnership and bloom?"]

Holt, Jim."Mathematics on Ice." The London Review of Books 31.16 (August 2009) ["A surprising number of mathematicians, even quite prominent ones, believe in a realm of perfect mathematical entities hovering over the empirical world – a sort of Platonic heaven. Alain Connes of the Collège de France once declared that ‘there exists, independently of the human mind, a raw and immutable mathematical reality,’ one that is ‘far more permanent than the physical reality that surrounds us’. Roger Penrose, another unabashed Platonist, holds that the natural world is only a ‘shadow’ of a realm of eternal mathematical forms."]

Horgan, John. "Why Does Jim Holt Exist?" Scientific American (July 2, 2018) ["A connoisseur of science, math and philosophy takes on the really big questions."]

Hyde, David. "Thoreau Meets Ice." Open Source (April 2, 2026) ["In 1854, when the escaped slave Anthony Burns was captured in Boston and returned in chains to slave-owners in Virginia, despite riotous resistance on the dock in Boston, Henry David Thoreau himself was shattered. “At last it occurred to me,” he wrote, “that what I had lost was a country.” The question becomes: what would Thoreau say today if he learned that hard workers and taxpayers of long standing in this country and his state were being locked up and deported for want of immigration papers? Our guest Lewis Hyde says Thoreau would blame us, citizens, for the failure of our country and our Commonwealth to keep all its residents safe and secure in their adopted communities, regardless of their immigration status. Lewis Hyde’s essay, “ICE and our Immigrants: Lessons from the Abolitionists,” is forthcoming in the summer issue of Liberties quarterly. Thoreau’s essay, “Slavery in Massachusetts,” can be found in Hyde’s edited edition of The Essays of Henry David Thoreau (Milkweed Editions)."]

Johnson, David. "Not Yet: The Philosophy of Ernst Bloch." The Observing #143 (March 17, 2026) ["Not yet. Ernst Bloch was born in a factory town on the Rhine in 1885 and spent the next ninety-two years refusing to accept that the present tense was the final word on anything. He built an entire philosophy out of the gap between what is and what should be. He called it the not-yet. The Nazis called it incompatible. The East Germans called it a deviation. The students of 1968 called it exactly what they were looking for. This episode is about what happens when a man bets everything on a future he can’t prove, gets exiled, fired, suppressed, and walled out for doing it, and keeps betting anyway. It’s about hope as a philosophical structure rather than a feeling. It’s about the Vor-Schein, the pre-appearance, the light that the future casts backward into the present before it arrives. And it’s about the knock you hear at 3am when the rest of your brain has the good sense to be quiet, and what Bloch would tell you to do with it."]

Lukacs, Peter. "Can You Rewire Your Brain?'  Aeon (February 3, 2026)  ["Examples of neuroplasticity abound. During my neurology residency, one of my teachers, a highly specialised neuro-ophthalmologist, demonstrated the adaptability of the brain in a dramatic way. He recreated an informal experiment on himself by wearing glasses that flipped his visual field upside down. At first, he was disoriented. But within weeks, his brain recalibrated, and he was able to function normally in his environment. Even more remarkable was the re-adaptation that occurred when he removed the glasses; his world once again appeared inverted, and it took additional time for his perception to return to baseline. He later recreated another experiment by repeating the process with another set of glasses that reversed left and right, and he reported that this lateral inversion was far more difficult for the brain to compensate for than the vertical one. The experiment demonstrates how the brain adapts by recalibration rather than by restoring an original state, treating the altered input as normal over time. The ability to alter speech is another testament to the plasticity of the brain. One fascinating distinction in neuroscience is that speech and singing use different neural pathways. For example, some well-known singers stutter when speaking but not when singing. Elvis Presley famously had a stutter that disappeared when he sang. Ed Sheeran also stuttered as a child and tried many techniques to overcome it. Nothing worked, until, at age nine, he began rapping along to an Eminem album. Through repetition, his fluency improved. Similarly, the country singer Mel Tillis spoke with a stutter but sang fluidly. In each case, fluency emerges not through repair but through recruitment of alternative circuits."]

Maqiaque, Erin. "Their Own Private Genesis." The New York Review of Books (June 25, 2026) ["Too often we think of theology as some desiccated thing. For better or worse we now have other ways of understanding the complexity of human desire: neuroscience, psychology, pornography. We forget that for centuries, theological writing was our most sophisticated literature on sexuality—on desire, shame, pleasure, on why we want what we want and what all that wanting can mean."]

Marvin, Carolyn and David W. Ingle. Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Totem Rituals and the American Flag. Cambridge University Press, 1999. [excerpt, first ten pages: Description - "This compelling book argues that American patriotism is a civil religion of blood sacrifice, which periodically kills its children to keep the group together. The flag is the sacred object of this religion; its sacrificial imperative is a secret which the group keeps from itself to survive. Expanding Durkheim's theory of the totem taboo as the organizing principle of enduring groups, Carolyn Marvin uncovers the system of sacrifice and regeneration which constitutes American nationalism, shows why historical instances of these rituals succeed or fail in unifying the group, and explains how mass media are essential to the process. American culture is depicted as ritually structured by a fertile center and sacrificial borders of death. Violence plays a key part in its identity. In essence, nationalism is neither quaint historical residue nor atavistic extremism, but a living tradition which defines American life."]

McClellan, Daniel. "The Bible Says So: What We Get Right (and Wrong) About Scripture’s Most Controversial Issues." New Books in Christian Studies (March 18, 2026) ["The Bible is arguably the world’s most influential book, but do we really know what it says? Every day across social media and in homes, businesses, and public spaces, people try to cut debate short by claiming that "the Bible says so!" However, they commonly disagree about what it actually does and doesn't say, particularly when it comes to socially significant issues. For instance, does the Bible say we should be on the lookout for an antichrist associated with the number 666? Does it say women shouldn’t wear revealing clothing? Does it say it’s okay to hit your kids? In The Bible Says So: What We Get Right (and Wrong) About Scripture’s Most Controversial Issues (St. Martin's Essentials, 2025), Dan McClellan leverages his popular "data over dogma" approach, and his years of experience in the academy and on social media, to lay out in clear and accessible ways what the data indicate the Bible does and doesn't say about issues ranging from homosexuality, abortion, and slavery to monotheism, inspiration, and even God's wife. The Bible Says So is an invaluable resource for our fractious times. Interviewees: Dan McClellan is an award-winning public scholar of the Bible. He has over one million followers on social media and is a host on the Data Over Dogma Podcast. Dan received his PhD from the University of Exeter and is currently an honorary fellow at Birmingham University's Cadbury Centre for the Public Understanding of Religion."]

Nestle, Marion. "On Food Choices and Food Politics." Against the Grain (August 4, 2026) ["Food affects all of us — but while it’s a necessity for our survival, it’s also a vast, sprawling industry spanning the globe, which generates enormous profits as well as significant damage to public health and the environment. Nutritionist and molecular biologist Marion Nestle sheds light on the choices we all must navigate when we enter the grocery store." Marion Nestle, What to Eat Now: The Indispensable Guide to Good Food, How to Find It, and Why It Matters North Point Press, 2025."]

Reynolds, Jason. "On Hopelessness, the Virtue of Stamina, and Showing Grace to Ourselves." On Being (March 19, 2026) ["I was longing for a deep dive on the radiant and common-sense hope that Jason Reynolds embodies after I interviewed him at a Georgetown event last year. I got my chance at the 2025 Aspen Ideas Festival. Jason’s perspective is so urgent for the world we’ve now walked into: on giving ourselves grace to be hopeless, the virtue of stamina, and the hope that stays strong in him from his life in relationship with the very young in our midst — “the arbiters and purveyors of the future” — as well as an occasional stranger in a bar. Jason himself is preternaturally wise as well as talented and kind and humble. He’s become a friend across the years and is one of my favorite people in the world. Jason Reynolds is a New York Times bestselling author of over 20 books for children and young adults. From 2020–2022, he served as National Ambassador for Young People’s Literature. Among many honors, he has received the Newbery, Printz, and Coretta Scott King Awards, and was named a MacArthur Fellow in 2024. He is on the faculty at Lesley University for the Writing for Young People M.F.A. Program."]

Reynolds, Jason and Kessley Janvier. "On Being Young in America." On Being (May 8, 2025) ["A heavy complexity is on the shoulders of the young of our species in these years — humans growing up in this time. At the same time, from the digital revolution and AI to the ecology and society, they have wisdom and instincts in their bones that will be essential if we are all to flourish and not merely survive this century. In November 2024, the Georgetown University Collaborative on Global Children’s Issues brought Krista together with esteemed children’s and young adult writer Jason Reynolds and Georgetown student Kessley Janvier. The encounter between the three of them spans generations from the 20s to the 40s to the 60s and extended out to a room of people of all ages and walks of life. The wisdom that unfolded is as much about who we will be and how we will be as what we have before us to do, each in our own lives."]

Robertson, Derek. "Democracy Dies in the Techno-Dump." Liberties (January 2025) ["Thirty-five years ago, a Canadian named Ursula Franklin offered a dark prophecy. She predicted that unfettered technological development could strip us of the capacity to honor our fellow citizens’ very humanity. In such a world, she taught, democracy will become increasingly untenable — because liberal humanism is impossible to cultivate in a society dominated by atomizing, market-serving technologies. In January, 2025 America bears an uncomfortable resemblance to the dark world she foresaw. (She called that world an “unlivable techno-dump”). And yet, given the extent to which digital technology shapes our lives — our politics, our pocketbooks, our schools, our sex — Americans care astonishingly little about it."]

Robinson, Nathan. "Turn the Lights Back On." Current Affairs (March 22, 2026) ["It has been tragic and depressing watching the effects of the blockade. This is already a poor country. People didn’t have much to start with. But now they can’t take buses, they can’t afford to run their cars (I have been told gas costs anywhere between 10 dollars a gallon and 40 dollars a gallon, if you can find it—this in a country where a nice meal will cost you about $20). Food in restaurants is starting to run out. Garbage is accumulating in the streets. I had to sprint to get through a city block where the flies were so thick it was a struggle to breathe without ingesting one. The entire supply chain appears to be breaking down. Tourism is drying up—few want to come and experience shortages and sanitation crises. Taxi drivers can’t drive their taxis. With the evaporation of tourists comes greater despair, since so many depend on this influx of foreign money. Everyone in Cuba is warm and friendly, but you can tell they’re desperate. At the large San Jose art market, sellers had booths overflowing with souvenirs, and hardly anyone was there to buy. The merchants were outcompeting each other on pushiness—it was obvious many of them would not make a single sale all day. I cannot believe how cruel what my country is doing is. To take bread from the mouths of the poor, to destroy livelihoods, to turn old people into beggars, to kill sick people. I knew we were capable of this—the history of U.S. foreign policy since World War II, from dropping napalm Vietnamese peasants to Tomahawk cruise missiles on Iranian schoolchildren, has been a history of unbelievable cruelty and violence. But as I look off the hotel rooftop at a blacked-out city, and realize that we could turn the lights on, if we wanted to, I feel such deep rage that the wealthiest country in the world would inflict this totally needless misery on its poor, tiny neighbor. A billionaire president is taking these destitute people’s last means of eking out a living—and for what?"]

Schuster, Aaron"Kafka's Misdiagnosis." The Paris Review (March 20, 2026) ["The ways in which Kafka twists traditional forms according to his own disturbance are what introduce a new universal dimension for the Freudian age, the dimension of neurosis. Kafka invented a mythology for the twentieth century by neuroticizing the ancient myths: my own private Greece, my own private Judaism, even (given Kafka’s returns to Don Quixote) my own private literary modernism. The Abraham who can’t recognize himself in God’s call, or is just too busy to answer; the tardy messiah who arrives only the day after he’s needed; the not-so-great Alexander who cannot cross the Hellespont, arrested by the mere weight of his body (his warhorse, Bucephalus, makes more progress—studying hard, he becomes a lawyer in an age when there are no more Alexanders, when the reign of the master has been eclipsed by anonymous administration); the Sirens who don’t sing but rather silently gawk at an ear-plugged Odysseus; the office-comedy Poseidon turned into the harried supervisor of the seas, having exchanged cruising on the waves and his trident for paperwork and a pen—this is how Kafka revivifies the old myths, makes them speak to us again."]

Wilkins, Joe. "The Diarrhea Lettuce Company Has Been Linked to Forced Labor." Futurism (August 1, 2026) ["When the United States ratified the 13th amendment in 1865, federal lawmakers very nearly outlawed slavery for good — but not entirely. Tucked within arguably the most important corner of the US constitution is a massive caveat: “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States” (emphasis added.) In the 160-some years since that amendment, a quieter type of forced servitude has lived on in the US: prison labor. From the debt peonage of the post-Civil War reconstruction era to the privatized contracting of the 21st century, prison labor is a massive money maker, generating $11 billion worth of revenue in 2022 alone."]