Wednesday, January 28, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #5

Take responsibility for your education/understanding. Learning is not passive. Any teacher/mentor worth the title knows that they are at best facilitators for your learning. Good teachers lay out a map, point out the paths for potential discovery, detours and connections. Remember education or instruction (of any type - if it has a narrative, it is constructing a worldview) is never objective - pay attention to the way that knowledge is presented/represented to you. - Michael D. Benton

-----------------------------------------------------------

"Aftershock: The War on Terror – Episode 1: With Us or Against Us." The LRB Podcast (November 21, 2025) ["In the days after 9/11, George W. Bush declared a state of emergency and initiated what would become an unprecedented expansion of US power. Public debate narrowed: there were new limits on what was acceptable, and not acceptable, to say. The London Review of Books published a number of pieces that challenged this consensus, forcing its editor, Mary-Kay Wilmers, to defend the paper on national radio."]

Anderson, Ellie and David Peña-Guzmán. "Surfing." Overthink #149 (November 25, 2025) ["Hang loose! ... Ellie and David talk about all things surfing. They explore the long history of wave-riding across the globe, from Peru to West Africa, and consider how surfing helps us to reimagine social issues and what surfing reveals about the connection between flow and freedom. Is surfing the pinnacle of human life? How has the sportification of surfing directly contravened surfing’s anti-capitalist ethos? Why is the average surfer an image of white masculinity? And how is this image tied to indigenous erasure?"
Works Discussed
Daniel Brennan, Surfing and the Philosophy of Sport
Kevin Dawson, Undercurrents of Power: Aquatic Culture in the African Diaspora
William Finnegan, Barbarian Days: A Surfing Life
Aaron James, Surfing with Sartre: An Aquatic Inquiry Into a Life of Meaning
Peter Kreeft, I Surf, Therefore I Am: A Philosophy of Surfing
Aileen Moreton Robinson, “Bodies That Matter: Performing White Possession on the Beach”
Peter J. Westwick and Peter Neushul, The World in the Curl: An Unconventional History of Surfing
Wade in the Water: A Journey Into Black Surfing and Aquatic Culture (2023)]

Ball, Krystal and Saagar Enjeti. "Zionism Deemed HATE SPEECH In INSANE Social Media Censorship." Breaking Points (Posted on Youtube: January 27, 2026) [MB - TikTok's new American owner's are censoring any reference's to ICE shootings in Minneapolis, the word Zionism, any critique of Israel or mention of the Palestinian genocide, or any mentions of Jeffrey Epstein. An example of the growing censorship and propaganda regime in America.]

Bria, Francesca and José Bautista. "The Authoritarian Stack." Autonomy Institute (October 2025) ["This project maps the "Authoritarian Stack"—a network of firms, funds, and political actors turning core state functions into private platforms. Based on an open-source dataset of over 250 actors, thousands of verified connections, and $45 billion in documented financial flows. ... "The Pipeline Made Visible: Unlike old authoritarianism built on fear and force, this new system rules through code, capital, and infrastructure — making resistance feel architecturally impossible. It’s a self-reinforcing loop: Ideology fuels venture capital → capital captures the state → the state feeds the same private systems that built it. A new model of power — privatized sovereignty. Each layer reinforces the others. Ideology justifies investment. Investment captures state power. State power secures contracts. Contracts build infrastructure. Infrastructure becomes indispensable. Indispensability generates returns. Returns fund more ideology."]

Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. "Monster Culture (Seven Theses)." Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Ed. Jeffrey Jerome Cohen. Minneapolis: U. Of Minnesota Press, 1996. 3-25.     ["'This thing of darkness, I acknowledge mine.' Monsters are our children.They can be pushed to the farthest margins of geography and discourse, hidden away at the edges of the world and in the forbidden recesses of our mind, but they always return. And when they come back, they bring not just a fuller knowledge of our place in history and the history of knowing our place, but they bear self-knowledge, human knowledge - and a discourse all the more sacred as it arises from the Outside. These monsters ask us how we perceive the world, and how we have misrepresented what we have attempted to place. They ask us to reevaluate our cultural assumptions about race, gender, sexuality, our perception of difference, our tolerance toward its expression. They ask us why we have created them."]

Dudas, Jeffrey R. and Stephen Dyson. "Is 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple the Most Important Film of the Year?" The Pop Culture Professors (January 21, 2026) ["A parable of humanism and dehumanization centered on two charismatic leaders, the movie hits its marks intellectually and aesthetically. We consider its themes and ideas, and ask whether this movie and its predecessor – last year’s 28 Years Later – will be come to be considered significant works in contemporary popular culture."]

Fontainelle, Earl. "Methodologies for the study of Magic." The Secret History of Western Esotericism (September 20, 2017) [MB - OK, quick, what comes to your mind when you hear the word magic? I like the way Earl Fontainelle looks at these subjects from multiple angles. Here in order to start off an exploration of understandings/histories of magic, he breaks down the etymology, histories, and disinformation surrounding the word/concept. Highly recommended for those that practice magic, those that think magic is silly/dangerous, those that have deep religious beliefs (especially of a Manichean nature), those that are rigidly atheist (I would say fundamentalist), and definitely those that are wrapped up in fanatical ideologies (the type where whole groups of beings/cultures are the enemy and need to be wiped out). What is good or bad - how do we decide? what are the consequences of those decisions? What comes to your mind when you think of magic - what happens when we actually explore a concept and think about the multiple ways it is framed?]

Galimi, Rossana. "The ageing female body between feminist video art and horror cinema." NECSUS (Autumn 2025) ["Contemporary horror cinema continues to construct the ageing female body as a privileged source of fear and repulsion, as seen in films such as The Visit (M. Night Shyamalan, 2015), Hereditary (Ari Aster, 2018), or X (Ti West, 2022), where what Dolan terms ‘designed abjection’ is employed to pathologise the ageing female body, underscoring the impermanence of youthful beauty. X, for instance, cast the same actress (Mia Goth) in the double role of Maxine, the film’s young and promiscuous Final Girl, and of the abject old killer, Pearl. As noted by Rose Steptoe, Maxine’s sexual activity and youthfulness are punished not by death, as required by the slasher formula, but by survival, which will inevitably lead her to age and embody that very abjection. Barbara Creed’s notion of the monstrous-feminine provides a productive framework for understanding the ageing female body as a locus of abjection: initially associated with the maternal and reproductive body, the monstrous-feminine embodies the threat to the symbolic order through its excess and proximity to death, and can therefore be extended to later life. The ageing female body, marked in horror cinema by material decay and loss of reproductive capacities, acts both as a reminder of mortality and, as underlined by Erin Harrington, ‘a threat to the phallocentric order that centralises reproduction as the use-value of the female subject’. Within this visual and discursive landscape came the release of The Substance in 2024, a film whose exceptional success in the realm of both female-directed cinema and body horror can be linked to its ability to capture the zeitgeist about women and ageing. Coralie Fargeat’s second film features Demi Moore as Elisabeth Sparkle, stunning and athletic fitness television star who is sidelined by her broadcasting network upon reaching her 50th birthday. Offered a chance to try the titular substance, a biotech formula that creates a younger, improved version of oneself, she sees it as an opportunity back to youth, beauty, and visibility. However, the process comes with strict rules: only one version of Elisabeth can live at a time, while the other lives in a sort of coma for a week, otherwise the system begins to collapse. Reflecting on the biomedical commodification of youth and the co-optation of ageing female bodies by biotechnologies and practices of self-monitoring, the film sparked discussion on beauty standards and ageism. It reinvigorated feminist debates around women’s discipline over their image, the beauty industry, and, not least, the commodification of feminism – being marketed as ‘feminist’ despite its controversial treatment of the female body."]

Johnson, David. "Attention is the Last Frontier: Bernard Stiegler and the Age of Distraction." The Observing 1 (August 24, 2025) ["Bernard Stiegler’s life reads like something out of a parable. A young man with no future robs banks in 1970s France, spends years behind bars, and in that captivity rebuilds himself with philosophy. He walks out of prison not as a criminal, but as a thinker possessed, convinced that the real theft in our time is not money, but attention. In this episode of The Observing I, we explore Stiegler’s haunting philosophy of technology. For him, every tool humanity creates is a pharmakon, a drug that is both poison and cure. Writing, television, the internet, the smartphone. Each expands memory and possibility, while at the same time eroding our ability to care, to think slowly, to live with depth. Stiegler saw consumer capitalism as an attention factory, engineering desire, fragmenting focus, and hollowing out culture. He warned that the collapse of care, the long, patient work of knowledge, intimacy, and love, was not a side effect but the central mechanism of the system we live inside. Burnout, anxiety, distraction: these are not private pathologies, but collective symptoms of a civilization addicted to speed. We trace Stiegler’s journey from outlaw to philosopher, his obsession with memory and time, his warnings about the industrialisation of attention, and the tragic end of his life that makes his work feel even more urgent. At the heart of it all lies the question he left for us: if attention is the last scarce resource, can care itself survive? This is not just an episode about a philosopher. It’s about the world we live in now. A world where our memories are outsourced, our futures feel stolen, and our very capacity to care is on the line."]

Kim, Hannah H. "When Story Loses the Plot." The Los Angeles Review of Books (December 20, 2025) ["Byung-Chul Han’s The Crisis of Narration (2024) adds two forces to the critiques of storytelling: fragmentation of attention and the loss of narrative communities. In the past, the hectic pace of life might have driven us toward stories for closure and coherence; instead, today, the same pace—amplified by ongoing political and climate crises—collides with a media environment that undermines narrative form. We traffic in information that is additive and cumulative, stimulating but contingent, never shaped into an arc. Narrative depends on pacing the release of relevant information, but today we are either bombarded with an endless stream of updates or confronted with institutional opacity that withholds crucial information. Both forces prevent events from organizing into a meaningful arc, and Han thus argues that we now live in a post-narrative world. In this environment, “storytelling” becomes “storyselling,” a communication technology that can be more or less effective. And the kinds of stories that do thrive tend to be narrow in form: either “those people are the problem (and the truth will save us)” (e.g., news, conspiracy theories) or “you’re wounded, and understanding that will help you live differently” (e.g., therapy). The potent mix of capitalism, social media, and information overload has rendered most “stories” brief, disconnected, and designed for consumption rather than connection. Think TikTok reels, Instagram Stories, or the news cycle."]

Koopman, Colin. "The Power Thinker." Aeon (March 15, 2017) ["Foucault never denied the reality of state power in the Hobbesian sense. But his political philosophy emanates from his skepticism about the assumption (and it was a mere assumption until Foucault called it into question) that the only real power is sovereign power. Foucault accepted that there were real forces of violence in the world, and not only state violence. There is also corporate violence due to enormous condensations of capital, gender violence in the form of patriarchy, and the violences both overt and subtle of white supremacy in such forms as chattel slavery, real-estate redlining, and now mass incarceration. Foucault’s work affirmed that such exercises of force were exhibits of sovereign power, likenesses of Leviathan. What he doubted was the assumption that we could extrapolate from this easy observation the more complex thought that power only ever appears in Leviathan-like form. ... One need not be locked away in a prison cell to be subject to its designs of disciplinary dressage. The most chilling line in Discipline and Punish is the final sentence of the section entitled ‘Panopticism’, where Foucault wryly asks: ‘Is it surprising that prisons resemble factories, schools, barracks, hospitals, which all resemble prisons?’ If Foucault is right, we are subject to the power of correct training whenever we are tied to our school desks, our positions on the assembly line or, perhaps most of all in our time, our meticulously curated cubicles and open-plan offices so popular as working spaces today. To be sure, disciplinary training is not sovereign violence. But it is power. Classically, power took the form of force or coercion and was considered to be at its purest in acts of physical violence. Discipline acts otherwise. It gets a hold of us differently. It does not seize our bodies to destroy them, as Leviathan always threatened to do. Discipline rather trains them, drills them and (to use Foucault’s favoured word) ‘normalises’ them. All of this amounts to, Foucault saw, a distinctly subtle and relentless form of power. To refuse to recognise such disciplining as a form of power is a denial of how human life has come to be shaped and lived. If the only form of power we are willing to recognise is sovereign violence, we are in a poor position to understand the stakes of power today. If we are unable to see power in its other forms, we become impotent to resist all the other ways in which power brings itself to bear in forming us."]

Leonido, Tim. "Natural Systems: Gurney Norman and the dream of the counterculture." The Point (December 16, 2025) ["Running along the lower right-hand corner of The Last Whole Earth Catalog was something unexpected: a serialized novel that unfolded segment by segment across its 450 pages. The novel was Divine Right’s Trip. Though inspired by the ethos of the counterculture movement, it also posed the essential question of what should follow in the wake of the communes. In retrospect, the novel reads as a hinge between two emerging visions of human connection: one drifting toward abstract, digital networks, and the other toward engagement with tangible, place-based community. Reissued this August from Gnomon Press, months before the passing of its author, Gurney Norman, in October, the novel’s animating question still feels like an urgent one: In an increasingly networked world, what would it mean to return home, and to forge a literature that was rooted in place?"]

Magdoff, Fred. "Food as a Commodity." Monthly Review (January 1, 2012) ["Food is one of the most basic of human needs. Routine access to a balanced diet is essential for both growth and development of the young, as well as for general health throughout one’s life. Although food is mostly plentiful, malnutrition is still common. The contradiction between plentiful global food supplies and widespread malnutrition and hunger arises primarily from food being considered a commodity, just like any other."]

Mann, Sally. "Art Work: On the Creative Life." LARB Radio Hour (January 2, 2026) ["This week, we are revisiting our episode with [Appalachian] photographer and writer Sally Mann about her book, "Art Work: On the Creative Life." Medaya Ocher and Kate Wolf speak with Mann, whose book describes her path to becoming an artist and provides prospective artists with insights on how to weather everything from rejection and poverty, to failure, fallow periods, and the millions of things that can come between you and your work. The book includes selections from Mann’s rich archive of photographic work prints, explaining some of the ideas that have gone into her pictures, as well early diary entries that portray a fierce determination alongside equally fierce self-doubt. She also includes excerpts from her long correspondence with a fellow photographer named Ted Orland. Mann’s advice is to write letters, keep your receipts, make lots of lists, and remember that being an artist isn't necessarily such a big deal, it’s a job like any other: you have to work at it."]

Nyirenda, Hardy. "You Are Not Invited to the Orgy." Hardy's Substack (December 5, 2025)  ["Bataille rejected this denunciation of excess. Bataille flipped the core views of economics. For Bataille, life on Earth is not a frugal economy of scarcity but a profligacy of cosmic excess. He proclaimed that the sun showers energy upon us without asking for return; this is the source of what he called la part maudite, “the accursed share”. The surplus energy-biological, economic, down to the psychological-that any system must expend, one way or another. All life on Earth uses solar energy or stored parcels of solar energy, so there is a massive excess of it. The sun’s energy sustains all life on Earth; everything that we consume can have its route of existence traced through a chain that starts with the sun. Even in resources of oil and coal, fossilised plants and animals are just conduits that have held the energy of the sun underground for millennia until we can bring it back up to use again. Societies throughout history, with their abundance of energy, cannot sustain the critical mass of all of this excess. And Bataille states that here is where societies must spend the excess, ‘either gloriously, or catastrophically’. But not just spend the excess, but waste it for the sake of ridding of it. The modes of expenditure, gloriously, would involve non-productive, sumptuous but nonetheless socially constructive reasons; this would include art, festivals, rituals, monuments and the gift-giving ceremony of ‘potlatch’. Imagine the ancient societies that would have exquisite parties or animal sacrifice after a bountiful harvest. This relinquish in abundance to Bataille was what was truly sacred in societies, the extravagant art, banquets, cathedrals and offerings to the Gods, celebration for its own sake. What is truly human and opposed to the profane is relinquishing and making or doing things for the action itself, not utility. What makes life, life, more than the moments squandered against utility? Lounging for pleasure, intoxication and big beautiful parties. To look back on one’s life through the points of utility, repetition of chores and work are not the points we use to distinguish what made our lives worth living."]

O'Connor, Anahand. "How the Food Industry is Influencing Your TikTok Feed." On the Media (September 20, 2023) ["In July, the World Health Organization issues a report indicating that aspartame, an artificial sweetener used in many low calorie sodas and snacks, was "possibly carcinogenic to humans." The new statement on a widely utilized artificial sweetener led to controversy in the medical community, with the Federal Drug Administration saying they saw no concern over aspartame consumption. Some dietitians even took to social media to voice their contradicting opinions. Anahad O’Connor, a health columnist at The Washington Post, the response to the announcement on social media smelled a bit fishy. In a report released earlier this month with colleagues Caitlin Gilbert and Sasha Chavkin, O’Connor found that dozens of registered dietitians, some with more than 2 million followers each, were paid to counter the WHO’s announcement. He and his colleagues followed the money back to industry groups like American Beverage, which represents companies like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. This week, OTM correspondent Micah Loewinger sits down O'Connor to learn more about the growing trend of influencer dietitians and the long history of food and beverage lobbies attempting to influence our eating habits."]

Rexer, William. "Clubhouse Conversations -The Testament of Ann Lee." American Cinematographer (November 24, 2025) ["In this episode, cinematographer William Rexer, ASC is joined by interviewer Tari Segal, ASC to discuss his work on The Testament of Ann Lee — an historical musical drama from director Mona Fastvold that examines the life of the founding leader of the Shakers religious sect in the 18th century. The Testament of Ann Lee charts the radical religious journey of Ann Lee (Amanda Seyfried), an England-born woman who envisioned and established the United Society of Believers in Christ's Second Appearing — a religious sect that became widely known in America as the Shakers, due to their ecstatic manner of worship and Quaker roots. The film marks the third for director Mona Fastvold, who co-wrote the screenplay with creative partner Brady Corbet; Fastvold and Corbet's previous feature, The Brutalist, won Oscars for Best Picture and Best Cinematography (Lol Crawley, ASC, BSC) earlier this year."]

Roberto, Michael Joseph. "In The Coming Of The American Behemoth Fascism Hits Close To Home." The State of Things (January 29, 2019) ["Many Americans know fascism as an authoritarian ideology which blossomed in early 20th century Europe — first with Italian dictator Benito Mussolini and later with Adolf Hitler and the rise of Nazi Germany. But historian Michael Joseph Roberto argues that while Mussolini and Hitler were capturing the world’s attention, a type of fascist ideology was also taking hold in the United States, although the system looked different. Roberto says monopoly-finance capitalism and the dominance of big business over personal liberties is America’s own mutation of fascism. He articulates this argument in the book “The Coming of the American Behemoth: The Origins of Fascism in the United States, 1920–1940” (NYU Press/2018)."]

Rosen, Jay. "On the Digital Revolution That Wasn't." The Kicker (December 29, 2025) ["In 2006, Jay Rosen, the media scholar, published his influential article “The People Formerly Known as the Audience.” His medium was as important as his message. Although the essay would later appear in media-studies textbooks, it was first published on his blog, a form invented in the late 1990s that seemed, in Rosen’s words, to give everyone their own printing press. Armed with such technologies, he said, the public would no longer simply consume journalism as passive spectators. They now owned the means of media production. A beautiful democracy and a newly accountable press were sure to flourish. As Rosen knows as well as anyone, the world did not quite pan out that way. What was initially understood to be a technology of liberation became, increasingly, a mechanism of control: a means of surveilling the public, selling ads, and generating enormous profits for a small number of companies. Journalism and democracy both entered periods of sustained crisis from which they have yet to recover. The internet has even begun to abandon participation as part of its core ethos. As a recent analysis by the Financial Times shows, “social media has become less social”: partly because of these platforms’ algorithms, people are interacting with one another less and returning to the passive media consumption that the internet was supposed to disrupt. In this context, it seems that the people formerly known as the audience are… once again the audience. In this episode of Journalism 2050, Rosen joins Emily Bell and Heather Chaplin to discuss where it all went wrong and what journalists can do to fight back. Were the assumptions that the internet would help democracy and journalism simply naive? What did commentators fail to see at the time? What should we make of the return to blogging culture via platforms like Substack and Medium?"]

Silverman, David. "Silicon Valley's Dark Quest For Techno Fascism." Breaking Points (December 22, 2025) ["Krystal is joined by Jacob Silverman to discuss Silicon Valley's quest for techno fascism. David Silverman's newest book is Gilded Rage: Elon Musk and the Radicalization of Silicon Valley: "What happens if the world's richest and most powerful men decide to dismantle democracy? In Gilded Rage, New York Times bestselling author Jacob Silverman takes us inside the surreal, high-stakes world of Silicon Valley. This is the story of the political awakening and radicalization of a cabal of tech billionaires and their descent into ideological extremism. Flush with cash from the zero-interest era, addicted to their own mythology, these men have began reshaping the world in their image -- and it should terrify us all. At the center is Elon Musk, the mogul whose obsession with the “woke mind virus” has turned him from a tech innovator to an ideological crusader. But Musk is just the beginning. Silverman maps a sprawling network of radicalized elites - from Peter Thiel and JD Vance to the financiers bankrolling Donald Trump's return - who are using their platforms and their money to ensure a political revolution that's already underway. This is not just a book about tech. It's about power. We meet the billionaires funding life-extension labs and embracing apocalyptic visions of AI. We examine the populist rhetoric that is leading to the ruthless dismantling of democratic norms. And we enter the strange, darkly comic world of the tech-oligarchy where libertarian dreams meet authoritarian impulses, and where the people with the most influence over our lives are the least accountable. Silverman travels from San Francisco to Miami, New York to DC, following a movement that's rewriting the rules and oftentimes fighting a war against reality itself. With sharp reporting and a cast of extraordinary characters, Gilded Rage is a gripping, essential dispatch from the front lines of the billionaire revolution. If you want to understand who is trying to control the future, and why, then this is the book you need to read."]

Thalos, Mariam. "Resist and Be Free." Aeon (April 4, 2019) ["If we shift our focus away from thinking about ‘options’ or ‘alternatives’, and consider instead the opportunities for moulding our self-image in the course of resisting oppressive forces, we might be able to promote real freedom. That way, we can help people use instances of restraint or repression as moments of self-creation, by preparing people in advance of threats to their liberty. This new approach to freedom demands a metamorphosis in how we think about creating an identity, particularly in situations where we have been disciplined to rule out eligible options. Friends and critics alike do us no service when they point out that we can ‘do anything we want’. If we can’t see the alternatives as genuinely open, because of stereotypes or other forms of expectation, it doesn’t matter if they technically exist. True freedom is fundamentally about self-fashioning: you are free when you act out of your self-conception, even (or especially) when doing so defies what others think you are capable of."]

Tulleken, Chris van. Ultra-Processed People: The Science Behind Food That Isn't Food. W.W. Norton, 2023. ["A manifesto to change how you eat and how you think about the human body. It’s not you, it’s the food. We have entered a new age of eating. For the first time in human history, most of our calories come from an entirely novel set of substances called Ultra-Processed Food. There’s a long, formal scientific definition, but it can be boiled down to this: if it’s wrapped in plastic and has at least one ingredient that you wouldn’t find in your kitchen, it’s UPF. These products are specifically engineered to behave as addictive substances, driving excess consumption. They are now linked to the leading cause of early death globally and the number one cause of environmental destruction. Yet almost all our staple foods are ultra-processed. UPF is our food culture and for many people it is the only available and affordable food. In this book, Chris van Tulleken, father, scientist, doctor, and award-winning BBC broadcaster, marshals the latest evidence to show how governments, scientists, and doctors have allowed transnational food companies to create a pandemic of diet-related disease. The solutions don’t lie in willpower, personal responsibility, or exercise. You’ll find no diet plan in this book—but join Chris as he undertakes a powerful self-experiment that made headlines around the world: under the supervision of colleagues at University College London he spent a month eating a diet of 80 percent UPF, typical for many children and adults in the United States. While his body became the subject of scientific scrutiny, he spoke to the world’s leading experts from academia, agriculture, and—most important—the food industry itself. But more than teaching him about the experience of the food, the diet switched off Chris’s own addiction to UPF. In a fast-paced and eye-opening narrative he explores the origins, science, and economics of UPF to reveal its catastrophic impact on our bodies and the planet. And he proposes real solutions for doctors, for policy makers, and for all of us who have to eat. A book that won’t only upend the way you shop and eat, Ultra-Processed People will open your eyes to the need for action on a global scale."]

West, Stephen. "The Frankfurt School - Introduction." Philosophize This #108 (August 17, 2017) ["This episode explores the philosophical undercurrents of the 20th century by framing key figures like Sartre, de Beauvoir, Nietzsche, Marx, and Camus not just as isolated thinkers but as participants in larger historical and intellectual movements. The discussion begins with Nietzsche’s famous declaration that “God is dead,” reframing it as a mournful observation about the collapse of shared sources of meaning in the wake of scientific progress. From there, it examines how this loss of moral certainty gave rise to new ideological structures—nationalism, Marxism, and existentialism—as modern people searched for meaning in an increasingly fragmented world. French existentialists emphasized individual freedom and responsibility in response to the horrors of groupthink during World War II, while the Frankfurt School sought to revise Marxism in light of its historical failures and Enlightenment’s limits. The episode ends with a reflection on Camus’ Myth of Sisyphus, proposing that meaning can be reclaimed not through abstract reflection but through deep engagement with our everyday tasks—even when they seem absurd.
Further Reading:
Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre by Walter Kaufmann (2004)
The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance by Rolf Wiggershaus (1995)
Camus and the Challenge of Political Thought: Between Despair and Hope by Patrick Hayden (2016)]

---. "The Frankfurt School (Part 7): The Great Refusal." Philosophize This! #114 (December 23, 2017) ["This episode explores Herbert Marcuse’s concept of the Great Refusal—not as a set of actionable political tactics, but as a deeply personal, transformative process of resisting the dominant culture of aggression, domination, and control. Marcuse challenges the assumption that political revolution can succeed without first reexamining and reshaping one’s own subjectivity, which is often shaped by consumerism, media narratives, and social conditioning. He warns that even well-meaning movements risk reproducing the very systems they aim to dismantle if they fail to confront how monopoly capitalism has conditioned their instincts, perceptions, and values. Drawing from Marx and psychoanalysis, Marcuse emphasizes the need to “emancipate the senses” and cultivate a “new sensibility”—a more humane way of seeing and being that rejects the commodified, aggressive impulses normalized by society. The episode closes by framing this ethical and psychological transformation as essential for genuine liberation, setting the stage for a broader discussion on subjectivity and postmodern critiques." Further Reading:
The Great Refusal: Herbert Marcuse and Contemporary Social Movements – Edited by Andrew T. Lamas, Todd Wolfson, and Peter N. Funke (2017)
One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society – Herbert Marcuse (1964)​
Counterrevolution and Revolt – Herbert Marcuse (1972)​]

---. "Simone De Beauvoir Pt. 1 - The Ethics of Ambiguity." Philosophize This! #106 (July 19, 2017) ["In this episode, the discussion builds on Sartre’s view of human existence as a constant tension between facticity—the unchangeable facts of our lives—and transcendence—the possibilities we have to shape ourselves. Simone de Beauvoir deepens this idea in The Ethics of Ambiguity by arguing that human beings do not live in just one tension but inhabit a web of overlapping dualities: subject and object, individual and collective, mind and body. Rather than simplify these contradictions, she insists we must face them honestly, embracing the inherent ambiguity of existence. De Beauvoir critiques historical philosophy and religion [MB: Performative professional politicians are also guilty of this] for offering comforting but false narratives that obscure this truth. She emphasizes that freedom—our unavoidable capacity to choose—is the foundation of any ethical life. However, she warns that many fall into “bad faith,” adopting fixed identities or nihilism to escape the discomfort of freedom. Instead, true ethical living requires not only accepting our own freedom but working to maximize the freedom of others. Through this lens, meaning is not discovered but created through action, and ethics begins with the acknowledgment that we are condemned to be free."
Further Reading:
At the Existentialist Café: Freedom, Being, and Apricot Cocktails by Sarah Bakewell (2016)​
Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre edited by Walter Kaufmann (1956)​
Existentialism for Everyday Life: Finding Meaning in a Chaotic World by Aurora Koskinen (2023)​]

Wright, Joe. "The Making of an Autocrat: Co-opt the Military." The Conversation Weekly (December 4, 2026) {'In November, six Democratic lawmakers recorded a video directed at members of the US military and intelligence agencies. In it, they issued a blunt reminder: "The laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders. […] You must refuse illegal orders." The lawmakers were issuing the warning against the backdrop of US airstrikes on boats off the coast of Latin America the Trump administration claims are suspected drug runners. Many Democrats and legal experts, however, argue these strikes are illegal. Since returning to office, Trump has successfully expanded his power over his own party, the courts and the American people. Now, like many autocrats around the world, he’s trying to exert control over the military. In the final episode of The Making of an Autocrat, Joe Wright, a political science professor at Penn State University, says: "I am very concerned that getting the military to do illegal things will not only put US soldiers at more risk when they do engage in international missions in the future […] it’s a first step to using the military to target domestic political opponents. That’s what really worries me.""]


Strength Side (Workout)

100 Bodyweight Squats a Day (4 x 26)

Perfect this slow and full pushup routine

Mace Ballistic Curls (50)

Pancake Stretch (perfect)

100 pushups a day (5 x 20)

S

Staying Young sequence (Watch how he does it; perfect it: Horse stance; Split Squat; Push Up; Shoulder Roll; Resting Squat; Broad Jump; Bridge Push Up; Duckwalk; Cossalk Squat; Crawling; Pull Up)

Sandbag (see chart - arriving 2/1)

Animal Movement Conditioning (The Frog; The Cat Crawl; The Monkey; The Crab; The Crawl Switch; The Bear; The Duck)

The Hindu Pushup

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

Salutations
Leg Stretches
Warrior Stretches
Five Tibetan Rites
Magazine/Books
Work Out Circuits
Board List
Strength Side



Wednesday, January 21, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #4


Mikhail Bakhtin also discusses monologism which denies the reality, or perspectives, of other beings and cultures. Monologism engages in an extreme certainty, or even solipsism, in which the perceptive experiences of other people and cultures are blanket-rejected as not worthy of consideration or lacking equal-rights. In the most extreme manifestations of monologism there is the attempt to eliminate any dissenting voices because by existing they challenge the controlling narrative. Bakhtin states that monologism: “pretends to be the ultimate word. It closes down the represented world and represented persons.” To restate, monologism is the process of controlling ideologies that seek to eliminate any “other” voices or possibilities. It does not permit creative responses or challenging questions. Dialogism, or perhaps more simply phrased, open playful dialogue, is open to the manifold possibilities and potentials of various other ways of thinking and existing (292-293). The Brazilian educator Paulo Freire considers dialogic learning to be the key to the development of critical consciousness in citizens. Cognitive neuroscientist Adele Diamond in her discussion of the “science of attention” believes that this form of engaged, responsive awareness is the root of healthy development of our brains and body. -- Michael Dean Benton, "Dialogic Cinephilia" (Revised 2022)


-------------------------------------------------------------

With the advent of Late Modernity, the development of technology brought about a dramatic expansion in the possibilities of subjugation.

A first taste of this new scenario was offered by the totalitarian regimes of the Twentieth Century, with their systems of total policing. Yet, as noted by the intellectual Piers Paolo Pasolini, despite their murderous brutality, totalitarian regimes had to settle merely for public displays of obedience to their commands. Their formidable claws were still unable to penetrate the hard kernel of the imagination of their subjects. Things changed, Pasolini continued, with the expansion of new forms of communication, from the first television to the omnipresence of the 'society of the spectacle.' By the last quarter of the century, the dominantsociety were able not only to control external behaviours but also to instill effective forms of self-policing within their subjects. What used to be simple propaganda developed instead into the silent transformation of individual souls, while the laughable spectacle of totalitarian parades turned into the spontaneous processions of self-exploiting workers and consumers.

Thus, in the contemporary age, the pale sun of Late Modernity shines over a two-fold struggle for autonomy: the fight to preserve the possibility of socially deviant behaviours (including one'a active rebellion against perceived injustices), and the challenge to decolonize one's interiority from the socially dominant ideas, assumptions and diktats that pervade every person's sense of self and reality (307-308).

Campagna, Frederico. Otherworldly: Mediterranean Lessons on Escaping History. Bloomsbury, 2025.



----------------------------------------------------------


"Ethics and politics look at both how we should regard and accommodate each other and what kind of things make it possible to, for example, treat each other with respect and what kinds of things don't. That I might view you as "weird" or even "inhuman" (politics) may very much dictate how I then treat you (ethics). When we examine more closely how we think about the world, it turns out that ethics and politics are inseparable." (21) -- Veronique Pin-Fat "How Do We Begin to Think About the World?" Global Politics. 2nd ed. Routledge, 2013: 20 - 38.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Anderson, Ellie and David M. Peña-Guzmán. "Confidence." #147 (November 11, 2025) ["Ellie and David discuss confidence. Modernity has created a crisis of confidence, leading to the demand that we all maximize our confidence. But what is confidence? Is it a personality trait or a relational concept? What causes under- and over-confidence? And is instilling confidence an equity issue? Your hosts think through Charles Pépin’s pillars of confidence, Don A. Moore's formula for calibrating your confidence, and the gendered nature of confidence through bodily expressions."
Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Self-Reliance”
Don A. Moore, Perfectly Confident: How to Calibrate Your Decisions Wisely
Charles Pépin, Self-Confidence: A Philosophy
Iris Marion Young, “Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body."]

Bassili, Rafaela. "What Kind of Country Is This?: On The Secret Agent." Notebook (November 26, 2025) ["Kleber Mendonça Filho’s paranoid thriller captures the absurdity and horror peculiar to Brazil."]

Bellaigue, Christopher de. "Hype and Fraud in India." The New York Review of Books (January 15, 2026) ["Narendra Modi is pursuing his vision of “developed India” through distorted claims of progress, stolen elections, and anti-Muslim policies."]

Cohn, Lindsay P., et al. "The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil." Lawfare Daily (November 8, 2025) [" Lawfare General Counsel and Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson held a series of conversations with contributors to a special series of articles on “The Dangers of Deploying the Military on U.S. Soil” that Lawfare recently published on its website, in coordination with our friends at Protect Democracy. Participants include: Alex Tausanovitch, Policy Advocate at Protect Democracy; Laura Dickinson, a Professor at George Washington University Law School; Joseph Nunn, Counsel in the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center; Chris Mirasola, an Assistant Professor at the University of Houston Law Center; Mark Nevitt, a Professor at Emory University School of Law; Elaine McCusker, a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; and Lindsay P. Cohn, a Professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Naval War College. Together, they discussed how and why domestic deployments are being used, the complex set of legal authorities allowing presidents and governors to do so, and what the consequences might be, both for U.S. national security and for U.S. civil-military relations more generally."]

Dabhoiwala, Fara. “What is Free Speech? The History of a Dangerous Idea." LARB Radio Hour (September 5, 2025) ["Kate Wolf speaks with historian Fara Dabhoiwala about his new book, What is Free Speech? The History of a Dangerous Idea. A foundational aspect of the U.S. Constitution, free speech is a relatively recent invention and one rooted less in democratic ideals than first may be clear. Tracking its evolution from the pre-modern age through the Enlightenment to our present day, Dabhoiwala explores how free speech and freedom of the press initially served imperial and corporate interests rather than those of common citizens. His book also examines the counterintuitive ways free speech continues to be an engine for questionable ends today, benefitting tech companies and upholding misogyny and racism. But while it has never been equally distributed, free speech has also resulted, at times, in more freedom rather than less, so what are we to do with this abiding concept and how might we modify its absolutism to better serve those it claims to protect?"]

Doctorow, Cory. "How to Stop “Enshittification” Before It Kills the Internet." Capitalisn't (December 11, 2025) ["There’s a word that’s gained a lot of popularity in the last year: “enshittification”. It refers to a trajectory many see with digital platforms: they initially offer immense value to users, only to systematically degrade that quality over time in order to extract maximum surplus for shareholders. We invited the coiner of this term, science fiction author and activist Cory Doctorow, on the podcast to discuss whether he thinks this decline is an inevitable feature of digital markets or a consequence of specific policy failures. And, most importantly, how he thinks it could be reversed. For Doctorow, "enshittification" is not simply a result of "revealed preferences", where users tolerate worse service because they value the platform, but rather the outcome of a regulatory environment that has permitted the creation of high switching costs and the elimination of competitors. Doctorow also argues that historically, interoperability acted as an engine of dynamism, allowing new entrants to lower the barriers to entry. But current IP frameworks, such as anti-circumvention laws, have been "weaponized" to prevent this, effectively allowing firms to enforce cartels and engage in rent-seeking behavior. Finally, Doctorow offers a critical assessment of the current AI boom, arguing that the sector is creating "reverse centaurs", where human labor is conscripted to correct algorithmic errors, and warns of a potential asset bubble driven by inflated revenue attribution."]

Glick, Jacob. "A Jan. 6 Committee Staff Member on Far-Right Extremism." Lawfare Daily (January 10, 2026) ["The Jan. 6 committee’s final report on the insurrection is over 800 pages, including the footnotes. But there’s still new information coming out about the committee’s findings and its work. Last week, we brought you one of the staffers who worked on the Jan. 6 committee’s investigation into the role of social media in the insurrection. Today, we’re featuring a conversation with Jacob Glick, who served as investigative counsel on the committee and is currently a policy counsel at Georgetown’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection. His work in the Jan. 6 investigation focused on social media and far-right extremism. Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic spoke with Jacob about what the investigation showed him about the forces that led to Jan. 6, how he understands the threat still posed by extremism, and what it was like interviewing Twitter whistleblowers and members of far-right groups who stormed the Capitol."]

Glied, Sherry and Paul Starr. "Health Insurance in America." Throughline (February 27, 2025) ["Millions of Americans depend on their jobs for health insurance. But that's not the case in many other wealthy countries. How did the U.S. end up with a system that's so expensive, yet leaves so many people vulnerable? On this episode, how a temporary solution created an everlasting problem." Guests: Sherry Glied, Dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University; Paul Starr, professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University."]

Godar, Bryn and Carolyn Shapiro. "Can Minnesota Prosecute Ice Agent Jonathan Ross." Lawfare Daily (January 22, 2026) ["Senior Editor Anna Bower spoke with Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of Chicago-Kent College of Law's Institute on the Supreme Court, and Bryna Godar, a Staff Attorney with the at the University of Wisconsin Law School. The discussion covered the state of Minnesota’s jurisdiction to criminally investigate Jonathan Ross, the ICE official who reportedly shot and killed Renee Nicole Good on Jan. 7. The conversation also covered obstacles state prosecutors might face in pursuing a potential prosecution and the likelihood that Ross could raise what’s known as 'Supremacy Clause immunity.'"]

Goi, Leonardo. "In Sunny Southland: Paul Thomas Anderson and Thomas Pynchon’s California." Notebook (November 24, 2025) ["By 1970, when Anderson was born in Studio City, Pynchon had quit his gig writing safety articles for Boeing in Seattle and decamped to Los Angeles. He landed in a small apartment in Manhattan Beach, which would appear in his books as the fictional Gordita Beach, a last resort for bums, drifters, punks, and drop-outs determined to steer clear of the straight life. And though his novels have journeyed far and wide—from New York City (V., 1963; Bleeding Edge, 2013) to Chicago (Against the Day, 2006); from the American colonies (Mason & Dixon, 1997) to Europe, Namibia, and Siberia (Gravity’s Rainbow, 1973)—Pynchon has become closely identified with the countercultural hangover that swept through post-Manson California and serves as backdrop for the two texts Anderson would go on to adapt, Inherent Vice (2009) and now Vineland (1990). Novelist and filmmaker are unmistakably smitten with the textures of “sunny Southland,” to use a phrase popularized in the late 1800s by newspaper editor Harrison Gray Otis (who incidentally lifted it from the Confederacy). But they reserve their deepest feeling for its eccentric residents—drifters who straddle the old and the new, who have only just started to realize how the changing of the guard is leaving them behind, who have seen their turf transform to the point they can barely recognize it. Still, neither artist has ever simplistically romanticized that bygone milieu. Their characters fumble as they navigate a world rife with signs, secrets, and conspiracies, a California candied not with “identifiable cit[ies]” but with “grouping[s] of concepts,” where everyone and everything suggests “a hieroglyphic sense of concealed meaning,” per The Crying of Lot 49. That novel came out in April 1966, just a few months before Reagan was elected governor, promising to crack down on the “filthy speech movement” fueled by the student protests at Berkeley and to send “the welfare bums back to work.” The repression and censorship that would dominate Reagan-era California (and eventually all of the United States under his presidency) permeate Vineland and Inherent Vice, in which the actor-turned-politico serves as an omnipresent specter, a kind of daemon ex machina restoring fascism at home and abroad. A mood of chronic paranoia permeates Pynchon’s prose and Anderson’s cinema; what binds them isn’t just some autobiographical affair with Los Angeles but an interest in its sinister side: In the words of Inherent Vice’s Detective Lieutenant “Bigfoot” Bjornsen, “The dark forces that are always there just out of the sunlight.”"]

Jasechko, Scott, et al. "Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally." Nature (January 2024) ["Groundwater resources are vital to ecosystems and livelihoods. Excessive groundwater withdrawals can cause groundwater levels to decline, resulting in seawater intrusion, land subsidence, streamflow depletion and wells running dry. However, the global pace and prevalence of local groundwater declines are poorly constrained, because in situ groundwater levels have not been synthesized at the global scale. Here we analyse in situ groundwater-level trends for 170,000 monitoring wells and 1,693 aquifer systems in countries that encompass approximately 75% of global groundwater withdrawals. We show that rapid groundwater-level declines (>0.5 m year−1) are widespread in the twenty-first century, especially in dry regions with extensive croplands. Critically, we also show that groundwater-level declines have accelerated over the past four decades in 30% of the world’s regional aquifers. This widespread acceleration in groundwater-level deepening highlights an urgent need for more effective measures to address groundwater depletion. Our analysis also reveals specific cases in which depletion trends have reversed following policy changes, managed aquifer recharge and surface-water diversions, demonstrating the potential for depleted aquifer systems to recover."]

Johnson, Allan. "Literature as Occultism." Against Everyone #308 (November 25, 2025) ["... ALLAN JOHNSON Professor of English Literature at University of Surrey, meditation coach, and author of the excellent book, The Sacred Life of Modernist Literature: Immanence, Occultism, and the Making of the Modern World. In that book, Allan states: “The occult has always walked the perilous line between desiring a textual form while resisting the possibility that this form can ever be completely achieved.” One place we find the textual form of the occult is in literature - but I don’t mean that in the way that you think… One of my big frustrations with spiritual influencers who are online, have podcasts, write books and more is that most of them don’t seem to have a good grasp of art, but particularly literature. One reason why is that… well reading books that have occult forms usually take a lot of work. Lots of occultists, magicians, pagans do something like this: they read literature that has magical content and create metaphors and analogies that - all-too conveniently - mirror the lessons of their own esoteric view. And they reach for the easiest usual suspects: Lord of the Rings, Ursula K Le Guin, Star Wars, Paulo Coehlo, etc. But the location of occult and esoteric strength in literature is in its innovative forms and styles - in novelists who wrote in tensions between absence and presence, in multiple innovative structures and voices, in elliptical maneuvers and sentences that change their direction before you finish them. These forms were brought to us most prominently in modernist literature - in James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, Kafka, and more. And it’s also found in poets like TS Elliot, Ezra Pound, and WB Yeats. In the works of modernist writers, the reader’s involvement is demanded to complete the text. They showed us that fiction itself is an occult endeavor - and that reading is a moral technology, maybe one of the only moral technologies. With literature, we meet the other mind, and we co-create reality through symbols, light, and imagination. Writers that ask us to meet them, to do as much in the reading as they do in the writing, bring us so far in our development. They are writers who initiate us with their works. Allan and I talk about all of this in depth. We also talk about Marianne Williamson, Wilhelm Reich, psychoanalysis, and more."]

Juengst, Eric and Daniel Moseley. "Human Enhancement." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (November 13, 2025) ['At first glance there does not seem to be anything philosophically problematic about human enhancement. Activities such as physical fitness routines, wearing eyeglasses, taking music lessons and meditation are routinely utilized for the goal of enhancing human capacities. But there are a cluster of debates in practical ethics, conventionally labeled as “the ethics of human enhancement”, that do raise philosophical questions. These debates include clinicians’ concerns about the limits of legitimate health care, parents’ worries about their reproductive and rearing obligations, and the fairness of competitive practices like sports and war, and the possibility of improving human moral agency itself. They also involve more general questions about distributive justice, science policy, and the public regulation of medical technologies. As usual in practical ethics, an adequate discussion of any specific debate under this heading quickly requires orientation to the science and the social and political practices of specific enhancement interventions. At each turn in these discussions, wide vistas of background philosophical topics also appear for exploration. Rather than providing a detailed account of this whole landscape, we trace a path of core concerns that winds through the current debates on the ethics of human enhancement, as a guide for those interested in exploring further."]

Kafer, Gary. "There is No A.I." Jump Cut #62 (Winter 2023 - 2024) [Review of Kate Crawford, The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021: "The first chapter, “Earth,” examines the mineral mining practices that underpin the construction of computational systems. In chapter two, “Labor,” Crawford examines the forms of workplace surveillance that enervate data systems—including digital pieceworkers, Amazon warehouses, and assembly lines—all of which subject the body to temporal management. "Data” is the subject of the third chapter, which tracks how datasets are built from harvesting personal information and transformed into pattern recognition models. Chapter four, “Classification,” focuses on how that data is used to construct taxonomies of social differences like race and gender within machine learning systems. Next, Crawford turns to “Affect,” recounting the history of scientific attempts to create universal mappings of facial expressions that now subtend the development of emotion detection systems by tech industries. The final chapter turns to the “State” to explore how the private AI industry is taking an active role in reshaping government activities, including policing and warfare. Crawford’s atlas concludes with a discussion of “Power” and the possibility for justice, which is followed by a brief coda exploring the role of “Space” as the ultimate frontier of AI’s imperial project."]

Lembke, Anna. "The Paradox of Pleasure." Hidden Brain (December 8, 2025) ["All of us think we know what addiction looks like. It’s the compulsive consumption of drugs, alcohol, or nicotine. But psychiatrist Anna Lembke argues that our conception of addiction is far too narrow — and that a broader understanding of addiction might help us to understand why so many people are anxious and depressed. This week, we revisit a 2023 episode that remains of the most popular in the history of our show. We’ll explore how and why humans are wired to pursue pleasure, and all the ways the modern world tempts us with addictive substances and behaviors."
Book:
Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence, by Anna Lembke, 2021.
Research:
Changes in the Global Burden of Depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study, by Qingqing Liu et al., Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2020.
Changing World Happiness, by John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, and Shun Wang, World Happiness Report 2019, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019.
Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Epidemiology of DSM-5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Across the Globe, by Ayelet Meron Ruscio et al., JAMA Psychiatry, 2017.
Dopamine-Deficient Mice Are Severely Hypoactive, Adipsic, and Aphagic, by Qun-Yong Zhou and Richard D. Palmiter, Cell, 1995.
Changes in Depression Among Abstinent Alcoholics, by Sandra A. Brown and Marc A. Schuckit, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1988.]

Madoff, Ray. "How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy." This is Hell (November 11, 2025) [" You've got $50 trillion, you should be participating in the system the same as regular working Americans. I think it would be better just to bring the richest Americans into our regular income tax system, the way that all other Americans are in it, rather than coming up with special taxes that we say are specifically geared to the rich." Legal scholar Ray Madoff joins us to discuss her new book from the University of Chicago Press, The Second Estate: How the Tax Code Made an American Aristocracy.]

Martel, J.F. "Bergson and Weird Philosophy: JF Martel on Time, Subjectivity, and Weirding Realism." Lepht Hand (November 2, 2025) ["Have you ever felt reality glitch, as though the weird was peeking through the cracks of time or the Real? In this episode of LEPHT HAND, JF Martel joins to explore how Henri Bergson’s concept of duration and Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of becoming invite a radically weird subjectivity, one that consumes rhythms, intensities, and habits across time. We discuss how this non-linear conception of time doesn’t just solve problems but also introduces new ones: what does it mean to be a subject in perpetual flux, and is this mysticism, metaphysics, or simply reality hiding behind a theatre of representation?"]

Milanovic, Branko. "Why Economists Should Care About Inequality." Capitalisn't (November 6, 2025) ["Recently, Bethany and Luigi joined economist and wealth inequality expert Branko Milanovic in front of a live audience at the Aspen Ideas Festival to explore how capitalism, democracy, and income inequality interact. Together, the three discussed the pervasiveness of income inequality around the world, its connections with democracy and political stability, if the inequality that really matters is that between countries, and if capitalism and democracy aren't as intricately connected as we thought. As a scholar of China’s economic system, Milanovic discussed how much of the country’s success can even be attributed to capitalism. In the process, the three unpacked if capitalist societies, particularly in the West, are able to address the very inequality they have produced. Are there free-market mechanisms to correct for inequality or does there need to be government intervention? If income inequality poses a dire threat to democracy, what should capitalists do to preserve the institutions that enabled their wealth in the first place?" Branko Milanovic's Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War.]

Nayler, Ray. "The Mountain In The Sea author Ray Nayler - Hugo & Locus award-winner." Sentietism (1/17/26) ["Ray Nayler is a Hugo and Locus Award winning author. Born in Quebec and raised in California, he lived and worked abroad for two decades in Russia, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Vietnam, and Kosovo as a Foreign Service officer, a Peace Corps volunteer, and an international development worker. Ray's first novel, The Mountain in the Sea won the Locus Award. It was a finalist for the Nebula Arthur C. Clarke, the LA Times Ray Bradbury Awards, and was named a London Times science fiction book of the year. Mountain was listed as one of the best science fiction books of all time by Esquire. Ray's novella The Tusks of Extinction won the 2025 Hugo Award, and was a finalist for the Nebula and Locus Awards. Ray's third book, Where the Axe is Buried, was published in April 2025. Ray's short stories have won the Grand Prix de l'Imaginaire, France's highest literary prize for science fiction, the Clarkesworld Readers' poll, the Asimov's Readers' Award, the Bifrost readers' award, and have been nominated for the Theodore Sturgeon Award." Description of The Mountain in the Sea: "Humankind discovers intelligent life in an octopus species with its own language and culture, and sets off a high-stakes global competition to dominate the future. The transnational tech corporation DIANIMA has sealed off the remote Con Dao Archipelago, where a species of octopus has been discovered that may have developed its own language and culture. The marine biologist Dr. Ha Nguyen, who has spent her life researching cephalopod intelligence, will do anything for the chance to study them. She travels to the islands to join DIANIMA’s team: a battle-scarred security agent and the world’s first (and possibly last) android. The octopuses hold the key to unprecedented breakthroughs in extra-human intelligence. As Dr. Nguyen struggles to communicate with the newly discovered species, forces larger than DIANIMA close in to seize the octopuses for themselves. But no one has yet asked the octopuses what they think. Or what they might do about it. A near-future thriller, a meditation on the nature of consciousness, and an eco-logical call to arms, Ray Nayler’s dazzling literary debut The Mountain in the Sea is a mind-blowing dive into the treasure and wreckage of humankind’s legacy."]

Rimbaud, Penny."This is Penny Rimbaud - Part One." Bureau of Lost Culture (October 29, 2025) ["Penny Rimbaud , who has spent more than half a century living the ideals that most of us only talk about, has been described as an activist philosopher, an anarchist, a Zen Buddhist. Though he would likely not recognise those descriptions, he is certainly a poet, a musician, an artist. Born Jeremy John Ratter in 1943, in the late 1960s, together with artist Gee Vaucher, he founded Dial House, an open community and creative refuge in rural Essex. It became both a home and a hub — a living experiment in anarchism, art, and radical living, from which emerged Crass, a band that tore apart punk’s nihilism and replaced it with a fierce moral energy: anti-war, anti-sexism, anti-consumerism — but pro-peace, pro-freedom, and defiantly DIY. Their black-and-white graphics, polemical lyrics, and uncompromising stance made them one of the most influential and challenging acts of their time. When Crass disbanded in 1984, Penny kept on creating, often with Gee. He became a prolific poet, writer, and spoken-word performer, continuing to explore themes of love, pacifism, and spiritual autonomy. Now in his eighties, he still lives and works at Dial House — still questioning authority, still seeking truth through art and language. We range back and forth across Penny's personal history and his thoughts on culture, capitalism, art and the very notion of the self. In his own words: “There is no authority but yourself.”"]

Sy, Lloyd Alimboyao. "What Future for Native Sovereignty?" Public Books (December 3, 2025) ["Five years ago, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which Robert J. Miller (Eastern Shawnee Tribe) and Torey Dolan (Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma) call “likely the most significant Indian law case in well over 100 years.” McGirt affirmed that the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s reservation had never been disestablished, meaning much of eastern Oklahoma remains tribal land. The ruling was celebrated for restoring treaty promises and affirming the legal endurance of tribal sovereignty after centuries of settler encroachment and legal erasure. But it has also ushered in a new era of jurisdictional entanglement: tribal governments were suddenly tasked with exercising criminal jurisdiction over vast swaths of land—including serious felony cases involving Native defendants—without the infrastructure, legal human power, or federal funding necessary to match state prosecutorial capacity. For many tribes, the 2020 decision poses a paradox: sovereignty is reaffirmed, but so too are the burdens of governance under inequitable conditions. That’s why there’s now a major debate in contemporary Indigenous political theory, asking whether sovereignty can still serve as a radical framework, or whether it has already been co-opted by the settler state. Especially in the aftermath of McGirt, a pivotal question for Indigenous political leaders is how to ensure that Indigenous sovereignty does not calcify into the same punitive logics, bureaucratic violence, and elite self-perpetuation that have long defined colonial rule. That question of sovereignty is answered by Jon Hickey’s 2025 novel Big Chief, which considers how Native self-determination navigates the same institutional forms that have long suppressed it. Sovereignty is the problem of Big Chief, but to be sure, Hickey, an enrolled member of the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, refuses to add any simple buzz to that too-often-essentialized word. As its front-cover blurb by David Heska Wanbli Weiden puts it, Big Chief may be “the great Native American political novel,” but in the process it complicates some of the rudimentary political aims of Native peoples today."]

Tobin, Vera, et al. "Spoiler Alert! The Psychology Of Surprise Endings." Hidden Brain (December 3, 2018) ["Writers and filmmakers hoping to hoodwink their fans with plot twists have long known what cognitive scientists know: All of us have blind spots in the way we assess the world. We get distracted. We forget how we know things. We see patterns that aren't there. Because these blind spots are wired into the brain, they act in ways that are predictable — so predictable that storytellers from Sophocles to M. Night Shyamalan have used them to lead us astray. In recent years, some scientists have begun to ask, can stories serve as a kind of brain scan? If a plot twist works by exploiting our biases and mental shortcuts, can observing the mechanics of a good story reveal something important about the contours of the mind?" 'Stories are a kind of magic trick," says cognitive scientist Vera Tobin. "When we dissect them, we can discover very, very reliable aspects of those tricks that turn out to be important clues about the way that people think.'"]

Torres-Gonzalez, Erick. "Za’atar: From Ancient Texts to Modern Conflict." JSTOR Daily (January 7, 2026) ["Some flavors whisper of home, speaking a language rooted in place and memory. For those living in the Levant, the slightly bitter and spicy notes of za’atar have been a symbol of heritage, culture, and resilience for centuries: an indispensable herb in tenth-century cookbooks, the heart of a rich communal harvesting, and the driver of poetic emotion. In these retellings, the plant’s name, transformed through time and languages, has acted as a passport allowing the herb to cross the boundaries of geography, culture, and identity, and with that acquire new meanings: Syrian oregano, Lebanese thyme, biblical hyssop, or, in Linnaean terms, Origanum syriacum. Today, in its dried and ground form, za’atar is best known as the central ingredient in the spice mix that has come to represent Palestinian cuisine worldwide. This herbaceous perennial grows abundantly in the rocky terrain of the Eastern Mediterranean and Sinai Peninsula, standing only about a meter tall, with fuzzy, spear-like leaves growing on hairy, square-shaped stems."]

West, Stephen. "The Frankfurt School (Part 6) - Art As a Tool for Liberation." Philosophize This (December 2, 2017) ["This episode explores why the Frankfurt School—particularly Herbert Marcuse—placed such importance on art and aesthetics in their critique of capitalist society. Rather than dismissing art as irrelevant during times of systemic repression, Marcuse argues that it holds unique power to transform how people see themselves and their place in the world. True liberation, he believes, cannot come through force or impulsive revolution but through a gradual shift in class consciousness, which begins by altering people’s subjectivity—their internalized worldview shaped by culture and media. The culture industry reinforces passive, oversimplified perspectives that prevent deep reflection or awareness of systemic issues. In contrast, great works of art can disrupt these ingrained views and offer glimpses of alternative realities, making them powerful tools for awakening and resistance. However, Marcuse cautions that even art can be co-opted by capitalism, turned into mere commodities unless paired with intentional action—praxis. Liberation, then, requires a balance of theory and praxis, guided by compassion, strategy, and a refusal to reduce others to enemies within the system they never chose.
Further Reading:
The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics by Herbert Marcuse (1978)​
Herbert Marcuse: An Aesthetics of Liberation by Malcolm Miles (2011)​
Art and Liberation: Collected Papers of Herbert Marcuse, Volume 4 by Herbert Marcuse (2017)​]

---. "Varieties of Religion Today (Charles Taylor)." Philosophize This! #240 (November 8, 2025) ["Today we talk more about the work of Charles Taylor and his book The Varieties of Religion Today. We look at different answers to a classic question around religious belief. The sociological and structural role that religion plays at any given point in history. Paleo, Neo and Post Durkheim versions of religious society. What religion becomes in the age of authenticity we live in. We paint a picture of the very unique spiritual predicament the modern person has to navigate."]

Zahavi, Dan. "Togetherness." Overthink (November 4, 2025) ["Can we ever be truly alone? In episode 146 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk with philosopher Dan Zahavi about his book, Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology. They discuss how the increase in communication through screens has shifted what it means to be together, the decline of social bonds in political life, and what phenomenological understandings of empathy tell us about being together. How do dyadic relationships such as romantic love and friendship shape our identities? Does there need to be a conception of the self that precedes sociality? What are the different types of "we"?"
Works discussed:
Alison Gopnik, The Philosophical Baby: What Children's Minds Tell Us About Truth, Love, and the Meaning of Life
Ivan Leudar and Philip Thomas, Voices of Reason, Voices of Insanity
Sherry Turkle, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other
Gerda Walther, Toward an Ontology of Social Communities
Dan Zahavi, Being We: Phenomenological Contributions to Social Ontology]

On the New Series Star Trek: Star Fleet Academy

I really don't watch TV series these days, not for snobby reasons, I just do not have the time to invest in a bunch of serial entertainment to find something I like. I recently saw a critical post from my friend JT pointing out how Elon Musk and Stephen Miller were shit posting the new Star Trek: Star Fleet Academy series on Twitter (now stupidly known as X). Their targeted attack was the diversity of female body types in the series. They mockingly wondered why there is no ozempic in the future. Miller and Musk seem to believe that people that do not fit their ideal of a proper body should not exist. I/we could go on for a long time about how ignorant and childish these two are - I would say misogynistic, racist, and fascist - but I figured I should check it out first and I recognize their intent is to chase people away from the Star Trek universe because it represents a positive post-scarcity alternative to their selfish worldview. I've been a long time fan of ST, from my earliest days, and frankly I think these two shitposters are currently the worst examples of humanity. I figured on a cold night, I would check it out for myself.
 
After the first episode, I can see why they hate it. It does represent a positive, not perfect, flawed, and trying to do better, vision of the future, in which people of all sorts are involved in working together for a better future. That idea, that we come together to build a better world, for all, together. They hate that. It is what they want to shut down. Probably most terrifying for them, besides the fact that all of the represented characters do not look and act exactly like them, is that the leaders in the first episode own up to their mistakes and try to do better.

A bonus is the casting! Check it out, and piss off Musk and Miller - the first episode is freely available on Youtube





Sunday, January 18, 2026

A Response to 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

In America, we are suffering through major cultural reverberatory concussions (the long-term denialism of our irrational 9/11 revenge on a global scale and the so-far, short-term paranoiac pandemic delusions) that have stifled our ability to address our perceived traumas or mobilize our vast resources to make life better for the population-at-large.

In the film 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple we see a similar cultural condition unleashed as a result of a viral infection that creates violent rage in a large part of the population (and we see what the ragers see in this film - which is a big narrative twist). The two responses portrayed in the film could not be any more different. Dr. Kelson seeks meaning in science and creativity (the titular Bone Temple). He feels empathy for others, including the most degraded individuals like the massive and violent rager that he names Samson. On the other hand we have Jimmy Crystal and his cult of Jimmies. They make sense through extreme hatred and violence against others. They glorify in pain and anguish, especially that of their victims. Jimmy Crystal, who resembles the detested British entertainer/sexual predator Jimmy Saville (but easily brings to mind for this American, Donald Trump), couches his actions in a childish fantasy of his being the son of a dark deity, and creates a religious narrative that this torture and murder is a form of glorification of his father.

I don't want to go beyond this for those that have not seen the film. I could write for hours on what I think of the film. It is subtle in its explorations through genre/mythic structures of these ideas and it is not polemical/didactic at all. Nia DaCosta, Alex Garland, and Danny Boyle have created a unique world and film. A rare sequel that exceeds the previous films.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #3

 "Thinking, as an activity, does not belong to some rarefied world of professional philosophers. 'Intellectual,' she said, was a hateful word. She held that everyone was capable of engaging in self-reflective critical thinking, and that doing so was necessary if one is to resist the tide of ideological thought and claim personal responsibility in the face of fascism. (10)" - Hill, Samantha Rose. Hannah Arendt. Reaktion Books, 2021.

------------------------------------------------------------

    Just as every culture has its own signs to represent the same mathematical numbers, so too it has its unique way of representing the blend of the sacred and the profane, visible and invisible, that underpins reality. A Greek nymph, an Egyptian god and a Persian angel are just different manifestations of the same infinite essence. Hence the ease with which the Romans welcomed foreign divinities into their pantheon and combined their mythological discourses. 

    This intuition which constitutes the core of the Mediterranean imagination, found a masterful expression in the philosophical system of Neoplatonism. Founded in the third century by the Egyptian philosopher Plotinus, Neoplatonism treated reality as a complex realm composed of multiple dimensions. Only a fraction of it can be experienced through the senses and classified by human languages; beyond this fragment, an infinite dimension yawns, surpassing any sense of concept. This arcane dimension sustains the existence of everything that is manifest in the world, yet humans can refer to it only through imprecise and insufficient terms, such as 'God,' 'pure existence,' or, in Plotinus' vocabulary, the 'One.' The 'One' is the Being of each being, the Life of anything living, the Presence of anything present. While remaining always the same, it takes on the infinite forms allowed by the world, thus appearing in different guises to different peoples or creatures. Hence the paradoxical nature of the world, which is at the same time one and many: infinitely varied in its appearance, yet one in its essence and in its existence.

    To illustrate this vision, let us imagine the world as a glass prism, which is traversed by the light of an external realm beyond space and time. Neither the transparent glass nor the colourless light is visible on its own. But as soon as they meet, they bring about an explosion of colours. Each beam of coloured light, like the mythology of each religion, is just one of countless possible manifestations that result from the encounter between time and eternity, language and ineffability, the profane and the sacred.

    According to Salutius, this was precisely what the Christians had failed to understand. The Christians wished to destroy the prism of the world and to retain only the colourless light of their God. The result, however, was the complete obfuscation of reality: they were blind to the colours of the world, yet they were still unable to see the essence of God's light.

    Salutius did not hate the Christians. He believed their mistakes stemmed from ignorance rather than malice, echoing Plato's view that 'is someone were to know what is good and bad, then ... intelligence would be sufficient to save a person.' With his book [On the Gods and the World], he wished to rescue them from their error and expose them to a wider metaphysical vision. Even though the Christians were a danger to the empire and themselves, they had to be helped and forgiven. As their Messiah had said, 'they know not what they do (138 - 140).' 
Campagna, Frederico. Otherworldly: Mediterranean Lessons on Escaping History. Bloomsbury, 2025. 

--------------------------------------------------------

Alexander, Travis. "Power and Flesh." Aeon (October 31, 2025) ["The reigning biopolitical disputes hinge on deceptively simple questions: what is the body for? What should we do with it? Are there levels of biology where a difference of degree becomes a difference of kind? If a human body changes (or is changed) beyond a certain point, does it stop being an altered human body and become, instead, something else? There’s no shortage of modern artists and thinkers wrestling with these questions. The choreographer Meg Stuart pushes bodies to extremes of movement; the multimedia artist ORLAN and the transgender artist Cassils use performance to test the boundaries of flesh and identity; another performance artist, Stelarc, stages the body as machine, grafted with prosthetics. Patricia Piccinini’s sculptures imagine hybrid anatomies, while the films of Julia Ducournau – director of the body horror Titane (2021) – and Claire Denis probe bodily desire and transformation. In scholarship, Yuval Noah Harari tracks the future of the human species, Kate Crawford critiques the bodily costs of AI, and Paul B Preciado theorises on gender transition and pharmacopolitics. And yet, few voices have been as persistent – or as transformative – as David Cronenberg’s. Since the 1970s, he has been cinema’s great anatomist, staging dramas of growth, decay and mutation. Over the decades, his vision has shifted: from a romantic belief that altered bodies deserve celebration, to a more careful insistence that people should be free to alter themselves only if they choose. The arc feels natural, but it is also urgent right now. At a moment when the fight over bodies threads through disputes on everything from vaccines to elder care, Cronenberg offers a framework we need: a way to affirm bodily autonomy without stoking the panic that casts every transformed body as a threat. His cinema points toward a politics of protection – one that secures the vulnerable while refusing to weaponise their difference, and that shows how the defence of bodies can be a form of solidarity rather than a spark for fear."] 

Anderson, Ellie and David Peña-Guzmán. "Masculinity." Overthink (September 23, 2025) ["Performative males, hustle bros, sissies, and manfluencers. In episode 140 of Overthink, Ellie and David discuss masculinity. What does it mean to be a man, and how has the concept of masculinity changed over time? They look at the male loneliness epidemic, the current influx of male influencers spreading right-wing rhetoric on the manosphere, and some of the main features of masculinity. Is masculinity rooted in violence and homophobia, or is it possible to have a healthy model of masculinity? In the Substack bonus, your hosts get into the mythopoetic men's movement and the connection between haircuts and masculinity."
Robert Brannon and Deborah Sarah David, The Forty-nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role
Pierre Bourdieu, La domination masculine
R.W. Connell, Gender and Power
Bell Hooks, The Will To Change
James W. Messerschmidt, Hegemonic Masculinity
Joseph Pleck, The Myth of Masculinity
Todd W. Reeser, Moderating Masculinity in Early Modern Culture
Frans de Waal, Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes]

Bellar-Tadier, Luna. "The Lesbian Allure and Colonial Unconscious of Todd Field’s Tár." Another Gaze (January 25, 2023) ["Tár is a rare film for this reason. Lydia’s type of appeal is not one that is depicted often, consisting as it does of the attractiveness and the desire that belong to a self-assured, powerful older woman who possesses no stereotypical feminine charm, but only the imposing matter-of-factness of her accomplishment, and a masculinity subtle enough to be invisible to an untrained or uninterested eye. Furthermore, Tár promises to deal precisely with the deep ambivalence which stems from the way such a figure both troubles and upholds existing modes of power. This appeal remains largely illegible in our heteronormative world (and in fact its general illegibility is an important part of its experience). It’s thrilling to see someone like this on the big screen, and to know that a straight audience is being made to understand that a young and conventionally attractive woman would pursue her (“Can I text you?” asks red bag woman, grasping Lydia’s hands when their flirtation is cut short by Francesca’s agitated intervention). Moreover, inasmuch as Tár echoes the plethora of contemporary “#MeToo” narratives, depicting this appeal is crucial to telling this story responsibly, for to not give the viewer a window into her desirability – sexual or otherwise – would render the women that flock to her mere dupes."]

Charman, Helen. "After the Hunt." Another Gaze (November 4, 2025) ["After the Hunt mistreats its material. Eva Victor’s sensitive, funny Sorry, Baby (2025) offers a useful counterpoint. In this film, too, the audience is told about but never shown the sexual assault of a graduate student, Agnes, by her professor. But rather than constructing a game of ‘he said, she said’, Sorry Baby makes a feminist choice: it takes Agnes at her word. She discloses what happened to her best friend and fellow student, who believes her immediately and completely without requiring specifics: the act itself is named only as ‘the bad thing’. Victor’s camera remains steady on Agnes’s face as she describes as much as she can of what has happened to her, in her own time. Rape does not need to be described to be identified, especially in an institutional context littered with historical and cultural examples of such abuses of power. Throughout Victor’s film, Agnes’s right to refuse to describe her experience is defended against the many cultural and institutional imperatives to do so, whether in the courtroom, the bedroom, or the doctor’s office."]

Chawlisz, Claudia. " Fixing Democracy: Citizens’ Assemblies." Past Present Future (September 21, 2025) ["David talks to Claudia Chwalisz, founder and CEO of Democracy Next, about how citizens’ assemblies could help fix what’s wrong with democracy. Where does the idea of a jury of citizens chosen at random to answer political questions come from? What are the kinds of contemporary questions it could help to settle? How does it work? And what would encourage politicians to listen to citizens’ assemblies rather than to their electorates?"]

Freedman, Sam. " Fixing Democracy: TikTok, Disinformation and Distraction." Past Present Future (October 19, 2025) ["In our penultimate episode in this series David talks to writer Sam Freedman about whether democracy can cope with the demands of the social media age. Are we really more vulnerable to disinformation than we have ever been? Is the bigger problem our ever-shrinking attention spans or our ever-divided politics? What happens to democracy as visual communication squeezes out the written word? And what might make things better?"]

Glied, Sherry and Paul Starr. "Health Insurance in America." Throughline (February 27, 2025) ["Millions of Americans depend on their jobs for health insurance. But that's not the case in many other wealthy countries. How did the U.S. end up with a system that's so expensive, yet leaves so many people vulnerable? On this episode, how a temporary solution created an everlasting problem." Guests: Sherry Glied, Dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University; Paul Starr, professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University."]

Gretton, Dan. "Desk killers: the psychology of committing crimes against humanity." History Extra Podcast (November 21, 2022) ["Author Dan Gretton discusses his book I You We Them, which examines the psychology of individuals who organised and implemented some of the worst crimes against humanity, from the Holocaust to human rights violations in Nigeria. In conversation with Rachel Dinning, he introduces the concept of the ‘desk killer’ – a perpetrator who is responsible for murder without taking an active role in the killing."]

Harman, Elizabeth. "The Ethics of Abortion." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 14, 2025) ["Abortion is the intentional termination of a pregnancy, either via surgery or via the taking of medication. Ordinary people disagree about abortion: many people think abortion is deeply morally wrong, while many others think abortion is morally permissible. Philosophy has much to contribute to this discussion, by distinguishing and clarifying different arguments against abortion, distinguishing and clarifying different responses to those arguments, offering novel arguments against abortion, offering novel defenses of abortion, and offering novel views about the relevant issues at stake."]

Harper, Shaun. "You Didn’t See What You Saw: Lessons for students on Renee Good’s death and the politization of facts." Inside Higher Ed (January 12, 2026) ["Just as people around the world are listening to dueling interpretations of what happened to Good, so too are students in K–12 schools and on college campuses across America. Those who have scrolled social media platforms or watched news with their families in recent days have likely seen at least one video showing the ICE agent firing his gun into Good’s vehicle. Their government leaders are telling them that they don’t see what they see. This is noteworthy for at least three reasons. First, it teaches students how to heartlessly politicize the loss of life. Defending the federal government’s actions is seemingly more important than is empathy for Good, her wife and children, and those in her community who witnessed what happened on a snowy Minnesota street that day. The lesson for students is that partisan loyalty and the advancement of a White House administration’s policy agenda (in this case, the mass deportation of immigrants) justify cruel responses to a citizen’s death. Also, they are learning that just about anything rationalizes the relentless pursuit of a partisan mission, regardless of who gets hurt and what crimes are committed."]

Hedges, Chris. "America the Rogue State." Films for Action (January 5, 2025) ["Can anyone seriously make the argument that the U.S. is a democracy? Are there any democratic institutions that function? Is there any check on state power? Is there any mechanism that can enforce the rule of law at home, where legal residents are snatched by masked thugs from our streets, where a phantom “radical left” is an excuse to criminalize dissent, where the highest court in the land bestows king-like power and immunity on Trump? Can anyone pretend that with the demolition of environmental agencies and laws — which should help us confront the looming ecocide, the gravest threat to human existence — there is any concern for the common good? Can anyone make the argument that the U.S. is the defender of human rights, democracy, a rule based order and the “virtues” of Western civilization? Our reigning gangsters will accelerate the decline. They will steal as much as they can, as fast as they can, on the way down. The Trump family has pocketed more than $1.8 billion in cash and gifts since the 2024 re-election. They do so as they mock the rule of law and tighten their vice-like grip. The walls are closing in. Free speech is abolished on college campuses and the airwaves. Those who decry the genocide lose their jobs or are deported. Journalists are slandered and censored. ICE, powered by Palantir — with a budget of $170 billion over four years — is laying the foundations for a police state. It has expanded the number of its agents by 120 percent. It is building a nationwide complex of detention centers. Not solely for the undocumented. But for us. Those outside the gates of the empire will fare no better with a $1 trillion budget for the war machine."]

Hirschhorn, Sara Yael, et al. "The Rise of the Right Wing in Israel." Throughline (October 12, 2025) ["This week, we’re bringing you the story of the rise of right wing politics in Israel and President Benjamin Netanyahu’s political career."]

Hudson, David. "Oliver Laxe’s Sirât." Current (November 11, 2025) ["“The resilience of this group,” writes Filmmaker editor Scott Macaulay, “their small-scale collectivism, and the way in which dance, and drugs, are a kind of social and even spiritual practice, as opposed to simple escapism, made me think of the late Mark Fisher’s final unfinished work, ‘Acid Communism,’ and his thinking here is an analogue to the movie’s techno-scored hedonic flow: ‘The crucial defining feature of the psychedelic is the question of consciousness, and its relationship to what is experienced as reality. If the very fundamentals of our experience, such as our sense of space and time, can be altered, does that not mean that the categories by which we live are plastic, mutable?’”"]

Ioannidis, John. "How Profit and Politics Hijacked Scientific Inquiry." Capitalisn't (September 18, 2025)  ["Why does a podcast about capitalism want to talk about science? Modern capitalism and science have evolved together since the Enlightenment. Advances in ship building and navigation enabled the Age of Discovery, which opened up new trade routes and markets to European merchants. The invention of the spinning jinny and cotton in the 18th century spurred textile production. The United States’ Department of Defense research and development agency helped create the precursor to the internet. The internet now supports software and media industries worth trillions of dollars. On the flip side, some of America’s greatest capitalists and businesses, including Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and Bell Labs, gave us everything from electricity production to the transistor. Neither science nor capitalism can succeed without the other. However, science’s star is now dimming. Part of this is due to political intervention. In the U.S., the federal government has cut funding for scientific research. The Covid-19 pandemic diminished the public’s trust in scientific experts, which social media has exacerbated through misinformation. Restrictions on immigration may further hamper scientific research as some of the world’s brightest minds lose access to funding and state-of-the-art facilities. But so too has capitalism played a hand in science’s struggles. While corporations sponsor a significant portion of funding for scientific research, this funding too often comes with undisclosed conflicts of interest. Or corporate pressure may influence results in other ways. Stanford University professor John Ioannidis is a physician, writer, and one of the world's most-cited scientists. He studies the methodology and sociology of science itself: how the process and standards for empirical research influence findings in ways that some may find inaccurate. His 2005 essay "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" is one of the most accessed articles in the history of Public Library of Science (PLOS), with more than three million views. Ioannidis joins Bethany and Luigi to discuss the future of the relationship between capitalism and science, how both will have to respond to contemporary politics, and how one even conceptualizes robust measurements of scientific success."]

Jilani, Seema. "A War Zone Pediatrician on What Comes After the Horrors of a Gaza Emergency Room." Literary Hub (March 5, 2025) ["In trying to fathom the unfathomable scenes of human tragedy in Gaza, I have turned to women whom I knew would not offer performative allyship or suggest moderating my tone of anger; nor would they diminish my tears or silence my voice as so many do. They have, not coincidentally, also been prominent women whose identities have been sculpted by Western colonialism. I have leaned on Fatima Bhutto, a writer and novelist who hails from one of South Asia’s most intriguing political dynasties, the Bhutto family of Pakistan. I have confided in Najla Said, actor, playwright and daughter of the Palestinian American intellectual Edward Said. His work implored the West to leave behind exotified images of Asia and the Middle East, seeing them as mirages which exist only to justify Western colonial aspirations. Said had a transformative influence on the humanities with his landmark book, Orientalism, which upended the prism through which postcolonialism would be studied. People like myself, Fatima, and Najla are daughters born of colonization. We have been forced to face a deep reckoning with the silencing of our voices on Gaza, enduring threats to our livelihood, our families, and even our own safety. Model minorities and children of refugees like us are the forgotten corollaries to dead empires. We are exotified, tokenized, sexualized, and lauded as consummate children of the diaspora."]

Kretser, Michelle de. "'I ask you—I beg you—to join us in speaking out for Palestine.' From her acceptance speech for the 2025 Stella Prize." Literary Hub (May 23, 2025) ["Recently, two groups of women have been on my mind. In the first group are Jo Case, Sophie Cunningham, Monica Dux, Christine Gordon, Foong Ling Kong, Rebecca Starford, Louise Swinn and Aviva Tuffield: the founders of the Stella Prize. My respect and gratitude to those eight women, who rejected business as usual, who decided to make the world a more equitable place, and whose activism resulted, against the odds, in the Stella Prize and the transformation of our literary landscape. Even if I knew the names of everyone in the second group, there wouldn’t be time to read them out, for they’re the women and girls of Gaza. They’re the women and girls murdered, maimed, starved, raped, tortured, terrorised, orphaned, bereaved, incarcerated, dehumanised, displaced, in business as usual for Israel’s genocide and ethnic cleansing—war crimes for which Australia provides material and diplomatic support. That complicity has had serious consequences for Australian democracy. We’ve seen scholars, creatives and journalists silenced, their funding revoked and their contracts cancelled for expressing anti-genocide views. We’ve seen precious rights eroded and authoritarian laws rushed in on the flimsiest of pretexts. We’ve seen our institutions and our media betray the principles they’re supposed to uphold. We’ve seen language suffer Orwellian distortions. We’ve seen our leaders pander to the anti-Arab racism of that global bully the United States. And all of this damage has been done to prop up Israel: a brazenly cruel foreign power, whose leaders are internationally wanted criminals."]

Laing, Olivia. "What did Pasolini know? Fifty years after his brutal murder, the director’s vision of fascism is more urgent than ever." The Guardian (November 1, 2025) ["I think Pasolini was right, and I’m certain that the warnings he kept uttering were why he was killed. He saw the future we’re now in long before anyone else. He saw that capitalism would corrode into fascism, or that fascism would infiltrate and take over capitalism, that what appeared benign and beneficial would corrupt and destroy old forms of life. He knew that compliance and complicity were lethal. He warned about the ecological costs of industrialisation. He foresaw how television would transform politics, though he was dead before Silvio Berlusconi came to power. I do not think the ascent of Trump, a politician formed in Berlusconi’s mould, would have surprised him very much."]

Leonard, Christopher. "The Meat Racket." Radio West (March 7, 2014) ["Just a handful of companies raise nearly all the meat consumed in America, and among them, Tyson Foods is king. According to the journalist Christopher Leonard, Tyson wrote the blueprint for modern meat production. He says there’s no better way to understand how our food is produced than to know how the company works. In a new book, Leonard explores how Tyson mastered the economics of factory farming to rise to the top, and how it transformed rural America and the middle class economy in the process."]

Lie-Nielsen, Kirsten.  "The Push To Get Invasive Crabs On The Menu." NOEMA (November 11, 2025)  ["Humans can be very effective at controlling animal populations when motivated to do so. We have hunted native species to extinction, so one approach that scientists and chefs are experimenting with is the consumption of invasives — also known as invasivorism — to try to control their expanding numbers. The strategy of “beating by eating” unwelcome creatures has been embraced around the world. Humans have reshaped entire ecosystems with their appetites."]

Marriot, James. "The Dawn of the Post-Literate Society." Cultural Capital (September 19, 2025) ["As Postman pointed out, it is no accident, that the growth of print culture in the eighteenth century was associated with the growing prestige of reason, hostility to superstition, the birth of capitalism, and the rapid development of science. Other historians have linked the eighteenth century explosion of literacy to the Enlightenment, the birth of human rights, the arrival of democracy and even the beginnings of the industrial revolution. The world as we know it was forged in the reading revolution. ... Now, we are living through the counter-revolution. More than three hundred years after the reading revolution ushered in a new era of human knowledge, books are dying. Numerous studies show that reading is in free-fall. Even the most pessimistic twentieth-century critics of the screen-age would have struggled to predict the scale of the present crisis."]

Moran, Dan and Mike Takla. "The Beast: A Film by Bertrand Botello." Fifteen Minute Film Fanatics (November 10, 2025) ["Have you ever felt that you keep making the same mistakes or that you have fallen into a pattern that could be Exhibit A as proof of reincarnation? The Beast (2023) uses all kinds of world-building and three different timelines to explore these ideas–and does so while faithfully adapting a 1903 story by Henry James. It’s the kind of film in which one could be lost in the red arrows that point out movie Easter eggs all over YouTube, but the real draw of the film is its incredible performances and how it combines intricate plotting with emotional weight."]

Narayanan, Arvind. "What Everyone's Getting Wrong About AI." Capitalisn't (October 16, 2025) ["Every major technological revolution has come with a bubble: railroads, electricity, dot-com. Is it AI’s turn? With investments skyrocketing and market valuations reaching the trillions, the stakes are enormous. But are we witnessing a genuine revolution—or the early stages of a spectacular crash? Princeton professor Arvind Narayanan joins Luigi Zingales and Bethany McLean to explain why he believes AI’s transformative impact is overstated. Drawing on his book AI Snake Oil, co-authored with Sayash Kapoor, Narayanan argues that capitalism’s incentives can distort technological progress, pushing hype faster than reality can deliver. They examine how deregulation, geopolitical competition, and private control over data shape the trajectory of AI’s development. They also explore what could happen if the bubble bursts: massive market shocks, exposed structural weaknesses in the economy, and a wave of painful restructuring that could echo the dot-com crash—but on a far larger scale. It’s a conversation that cuts through the hype and asks what’s at stake when an entire economy bets on one technology."]

Nestle, Marion. "The Money Behind Ultra-Processed Food." Capitalisn't (May 23, 2024) ["Critics of the food industry allege that it relentlessly pursues profits at the expense of public health. They claim that food companies "ultra-process" products with salt, sugar, fats, and artificial additives, employ advanced marketing tactics to manipulate and hook consumers, and are ultimately responsible for a global epidemic of health ailments. Companies are also launching entirely new lines and categories of food products catering to diabetes or weight management drugs such as Ozempic. Marion Nestle, a leading public health advocate, nutritionist, award-winning author, and Professor Emerita at New York University, first warned in her 2002 book "Food Politics" that Big Food deliberately designs unhealthy, addictive products to drive sales, often backed by industry-funded research that misleads consumers. This week on Capitalisn't, Nestle joins Bethany and Luigi to explore the ultra-processed food industry through the interplay of four lenses: the underlying science, business motives, influencing consumer perceptions, and public policy."]

Ryan, David. "Satirizing Horror and Spellbinding the Social Contract: Weapons (2025)." Film International (November 18, 2025) ["As a follow-up to Zach Cregger’s horror drama Barbarian (2022), Weapons explores the recursive relationship between personal antagonisms and the erosion of civic trust, staging what Robin Wood identifies as horror’s central tension—the destabilization of the social order….”"]

West, Stephen. "Achievement Society and the rise of narcissism, depression and anxiety - Byung-Chul Han." #188 Philosophize This! (September 6, 2023) ["In this episode, Byung-Chul Han’s theory of positive power takes center stage, building on themes of surveillance, control, and the modern self. Han argues that we no longer live in a disciplinary society where behavior is regulated through prohibition and punishment; instead, we exist within an achievement society governed by the illusion of total freedom. This shift replaces the coercive “should” with the self-imposed “can,” encouraging individuals to optimize themselves endlessly under the guise of autonomy. Han sees this as a sophisticated form of domination: people internalize the pressure to constantly improve, turning themselves into marketable projects, and framing their worth in terms of productivity and efficiency. In doing so, they lose touch with “the Other”—that which is different, imperfect, or disruptive to self-centered striving. Han links this to rising levels of depression and burnout, noting how technology reinforces this isolation by offering shallow, self-affirming experiences in place of real connection. True thinking, he argues, requires slowness, contemplation, and a deliberate effort to engage with difference. Rather than succumbing to a world of sameness, Han urges a return to presence, rest, and a deeper sense of the Other—practices that offer a quiet resistance to the invisible forces shaping modern life."
Further Reading:
The Burnout Society by Byung-Chul Han (2015)
Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power by Byung-Chul Han (2017)
The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord (1967)​]