Wednesday, February 11, 2026

ENG 102 2026: Resources Archive #6

In talking about how these discourses frame our political beliefs and actions, the word ideology is commonly used. Ideologies (systematic ideas) also act as lenses that filter the way we view the world and quite literally request we see the world in a certain way. When we completely adopt a particular ideology, a way of seeing the world, we begin to ignore any other way of seeing the world. What does it mean to be an American? An urbanite? A global citizen? A conservative or liberal? A capitalist or socialist? A Christian or an atheist? We could provide an endless list of identities, or labels, that we accept unthinkingly, as if they are obvious, when most of these terms are contested, limited, and problematic. Our unthinking acceptance of social labels and social cues (symbols) can be difficult to recognize, unless we visit another culture and then it is quite clear in “our minds” how they think and act strangely (for instance, comments of how they drive on the wrong side of the rode, eat disgusting foods, dress funny, etc…). A key critical recognition, then, is to recognize that they are not weird, ignorant, or wrong, they are just different from how we have been trained to think. -- Michael D. Benton, "Dialogic Cinephilia" (2022)

------------------------------------------------------------

Dialogic Cinephilia Exercises #10: In American History X (1998) there is a memorable flashback where a character realizes the development of his own violent, racist worldview, began through his conditioning as a child from the racist remarks of his father. The film is about the racist violence of the older brother Derek and his later deprogramming through engagement with what a mentor figure describes as an alternative history. In Slam (1998), the protagonist Ray (played by the poet Saul Williams) is a minor drug dealer that has been caught up by the legal system for drug offenses and is put into the violent environment of a New York prison. He is caught between violent forces within the prison that seek to force him to choose a side upon the threat of death. In a freestyle rap epiphany “Amethyst Rock,” Ray confronts both sides with his slam poetry claiming that they are doing the work of their oppressors in their violent acts against each other, and in doing so stopping the impending violence. Choose a film in which a character is raised to view the world violently and analyze how they learn to view the world in another way. - Michael D. Benton, "Dialogic Cinephilia" (2022)

---------------------------------------------------

Recognize the power of questions and do not let others silence/stifle your curiosity. Remember all knowledge is incomplete and in development. Life is too vast for any one
person/group/theory/discipline/profession/religion/culture/nation to grasp and understand.

Take responsibility for your education/understanding. Learning is not passive. Any teacher/mentor worth the title knows that they are at best facilitators for your learning. Good teachers lay out a map, point out the paths for potential discovery, detours and connections. Remember education or instruction (of any type - if it has a narrative, it is constructing a worldview) is never objective - pay attention to the way that knowledge is presented/represented to you. 
-- Michael D. Benton, "Dialogic Cinephilia" (2022)

-------------------------------------------------------

Barrett, Brian, Tim Marchmann, and Zoe Schiffer. "Minneapolis Misinformation ; TikTok’s New Owners ; Moltbot Hype." Uncanny Valley (January 29, 2026) ["In today’s episode, Brian and Zoë are joined by WIRED’s Tim Marchman to discuss the news of the week — including how far-right influencers spread misinformation in Minneapolis, and why TikTok’s US version is off to a rocky start. Plus, why are some people obsessed with the AI assistant Moltbot?"]

Christie, George. "The Life of a Hells Angel." Soft White Underbelly (February 1, 2026) [MB: I was recently referred to this podcast by my good friend Eric who recognized my curiosity about different ways of being in the world. I'll be honest, some of the interviews can be very difficult/challenging (subject manner and challenging my prejudices). I found this interview with Christie to be very interesting. He is in his 80s and is still remarkably sharp. His discussion of the early days of Outlaw biker culture and his reasons for identifying with it. The early history of the Hells Angels (a good corrective to Sonny Barger). Also, this particular perspective is very rooted to my homeland culture where HA's were a visible presence when I was growing up and in which there were strong mythos about the subculture circulating. I also was interested in his later progression out of the culture, and his emphasis on reconciliation between the various biker groups. "Soft White Underbelly interview and portrait of George Christie, the ex-president of the Los Angeles Hells Angels chapter."]

Cramer, Ruby and Emily Witt. "The City of Minneapolis vs. Donald Trump." The New Yorker Radio Hour (January 30, 2026) [New Yorker "staff writers Emily Witt and Ruby Cramer discuss the situation in Minneapolis, a city effectively under siege by militaristic federal agents. “This is a city where there’s a police force of about six hundred officers [compared] to three thousand federal agents,” Witt points out. Cramer shares her interview with Mayor Jacob Frey, who talks about how Minneapolis was just beginning to recover from the trauma of George Floyd’s murder and its aftermath, and with the police chief Brian O’Hara, who critiques the lack of discipline he sees from immigration-enforcement officers. Witt shares her interviews with two U.S. citizens who were detained after following an ICE vehicle; one describes an interrogation in which he was encouraged to identify protest organizers and undocumented people, in exchange for favors from immigration authorities."]

Fancourt, Daisy. "How the Arts Can Transform Your Health and Help You Live Longer." New Books in Critical Theory (January 23, 2026) ["Is culture good for you? In Art Cure: The Science of How the Arts Save Lives (Cornerstone Press, 2026) Daisy Fancourt, a Professor of Psychobiology & Epidemiology and head of the Social Biobehavioural Research Group at University College London offers a comprehensive and compelling argument for the ways arts and culture offer health and social benefits for individuals and societies. The book offers both the evidence for the benefits of arts and culture, whilst at the same time showing how many people and places are missing out and excluded from the positive impact of engagement and experiences. A powerful call for the importance of art and culture, backed by a blend of rigorous scientific and medical evidence, as well as engaging personal stories and narratives, the book is essential reading across the arts, humanities and sciences."]

Gleick, James. "How the Web Was Lost: The Internet was not Supposed to Suck." The New York Review of Books (December 4, 2025) [Review of these 3 books: This Is for Everyone: The Unfinished Story of the World Wide Web by Tim Berners-Lee with Stephen Witt; Amateurs! How We Built Internet Culture, and Why It Matters by Joanna Walsh;  Enshittification: Why Everything Suddenly Got Worse and What to Do About It by Cory Doctorow]

Gould, Rebecca Ruth. "Edward Said and the Task of the Intellectual Today." Los Angeles Review of Books (February 2, 2026) ["The Genocide in Gaza has revealed with brutal clarity how an entire class of intellectuals, along with the institutions that make their work possible, can be obliterated in real time while the states that fund and arm this destruction look away. Israeli forces used North American– and European-manufactured weapons to destroy all the universities in Gaza, including Al-Aqsa University, Al-Azhar University–Gaza, Al-Quds Open University, Gaza University, Islamic University of Gaza, Israa University, Palestine Technical College, University College of Applied Sciences, University of Palestine, the Palestine College of Nursing, and Hassan II University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences. Even after their physical infrastructures have been hollowed out, education in Palestine continues. Israel’s targeting of intellectuals over the past two years has shown the centrality of their role in resisting genocide. While the Israel Defense Forces have claimed that universities were destroyed in order to fight Hamas, the real targets were the intellectuals who keep memory alive and show their people how to turn education into resistance. Between 2023 and 2025, Israeli attacks murdered over 1,000 teachers and many more students. The destruction of Palestinian education has given new currency to scholasticide, a term first used by Palestinian academic Karma Nabulsi to describe Israel’s methods of offensive warfare in 2009. Taking the concept even further, Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute a form of genocidal epistemicide that aims not just at the eradication of an educational system in the present but also at the destruction of its very possibility in the future."]

Guariglia, Matthew and Brian Hochman. "Unearthing and Reckoning with the Intelligence Excesses of the Cold War." Lawfare Daily (February 4, 2026) ["Lawfare Senior Editor Michael Feinberg sits down with Matthew Guariglia and Brian Hochman to discuss their new book, “The Church Committee ReportRevelations from the Bombshell 1970s Investigation into the National Security State,” in which they chronicle the law enforcement and intelligence community’s Cold War excesses, the Senate committee which uncovered them, and what we can learn about the resulting report in terms of our own era."]

Huberman, Andrew. "The Science of Creativity & How to Enhance Creative Innovation." The Huberman Lab (December 19, 2022) ["MB: An understanding of creativity from a neuroscientist. The base line definition and explanation of creativity is excellent, the explanation of how we all are essentially creative is helpful (use it or lose it, but even more, you need to cultivate it), the functionality of our brain and the centers which control and modulate our creative impulses is enlightening, also ways to increase your creativity and hindrances to your potential creativity (some which literally kill it). At the bottom of the page there are links to more resources. "In this episode, I explain how the brain engages in creative thinking and, based on that mechanistic understanding, the tools to improve one’s ability to think creatively and innovate in any area. I discuss how convergent and divergent thinking are essential for generating creative ideas and provide three types of meditation tools (open monitoring meditation, focused attention meditation & non-sleep deep rest; NSDR), which improve our ability to engage in these creative thinking patterns in specific and powerful ways. I also discuss how dopamine and mood contribute to the creative process and describe behavioral, nutritional and supplementation-based approaches for increasing dopamine to engage in creative thought and implementation. I explain how movement and storytelling (narrative) approaches can generate novel creative ideas and how substances like alcohol, cannabis, and psilocybin impact our creative ability. Excitingly, creativity is a skill that can be cultivated and enhanced; this episode outlines many tools to help anyone access creativity and apply."]

Hudson, David. "Luis Buñuel: Desire and Deviance." The Daily (January 28, 2026) ["In 1929, the poster boy of the movement, Salvador Dalí, teamed up with a fellow Spaniard, Luis Buñuel, who at the time was working in France as an assistant director for Jean Epstein, to turn their dreams into a screenplay that became Un chien andalou (1929). From this first, now-classic short through “to his final feature, That Obscure Object of Desire (1977),” wrote Adrian Martin in 2020, “Buñuel always stayed true to those primary surrealist principles with which he most identified: a spirit of revolt; the subversive power of passionate love, both romantic and erotic; a belief in the creativity of the unconscious (dreams and fantasies); a pronounced taste for black humor; and, last but never least, an abiding contempt for institutional religion and its representatives.”"]

Johnson, David. "Mikhail Bakhtin and the Unfinished Self." The Observing (February 10, 2026) ["There are two kinds of voices living inside you. The authoritative word arrives with credentials, with institutional backing, with the collected wisdom of everyone who came before you and decided how things should be. It does not negotiate. It announces itself and waits for you to comply. Your parents spoke it. Your religion spoke it. Your culture spoke it. And you absorbed it so completely that by the time you were old enough to question it, you could not tell where the voice ended and you began. The internally persuasive word is different. It emerges from dialogue. From the messy, uncertain process of testing ideas against experience. It is the thought that keeps coming back even when you try to ignore it. The question that will not let you sleep. The feeling that something is wrong even though you cannot articulate what or why. The internally persuasive word does not give you answers. It gives you better questions. You change through dialogue. Through conversation where neither person walks away the same. Where words move between you and transform in transit and come back different than they left. But most people never make it past the authoritative word. Because the internally persuasive word is uncomfortable. It says maybe everything you were told was wrong. Maybe the life you built is not the life you want. Maybe the person you have been performing is not the person you are."]

Jones, Kent. "To Live or Clarify the Moment: Rick Linklater’s Waking Life." Senses of Cinema (March 2002) ["The alleged “indie” movement, always primed to make “heartfelt gems” rather than masterpieces, now seems to be on its last legs. Odd to remember that Jim Jarmusch and Rick Linklater, its two most noteworthy originators, are unapologetically artistic types. Of the two, Linklater has always been the more unassuming. Not unlike one of his charming, intelligent, loquacious characters, he wears his artistry lightly. If Jarmusch is the poet of American bitterness, then Linklater is the poet of American freedom, his characters comfortably operating as solitary satellites or within supportive enclaves of artists and eccentrics, free from alienation and freely giving voice to their obsessions and impressions. Many people regard Linklater’s films as “small,” hip,” “mellow,” “pleasingly low-key” – lifestyle components, befitting the indie profile as it evolved into a marketing tool. It’s not an uncommon occurrence in film criticism to get the artist mixed up with his/her subjects – just as Scorsese is often confused with his De Niro/Pesci characters, Linklater will probably always be thought of as a charming slacker. In fact, he’s a supremely attentive artist, to small things like the mood in a coffee shop or a 7-11, or the precise way that time passes on a long train ride. On another level, he has an acute understanding of the endless searching that lies at the heart of every well-examined life. It’s easy to miss the undercurrent of tension in Linklater’s work, perhaps because it’s a form of tension that haunts us all at one time or another, consciously or unconsciously: whether to seize the moment, clarify it or just live it."]

Koch, Christof. "Consciousness and the Human Experience." Converging Dialogues #472 (February 8, 2026) ["In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with Christof Koch on the nature of consciousness. They talk about why consciousness is important to study, differences with subjective experiences and phenomenology, selfhood, thinking beyond interoceptive perceptions, and Cartesian dualism. They discuss panpsychism, neural correlates of consciousness, vision, Integrated Information Theory (IIT), psychedelics, the future of consciousness research, and many more topics. Christof Koch is a neuroscientist at the Allen Institute, chief scientist of the Tiny Blue Dot Foundation, the former president of the Allen Institute for Brain Science, and a former professor at the California Institute of Technology. He is the author of many books, including his latest book, Then I Am Myself the World."]

Kolk, Bessel van der. "Trauma, the Body, and 2021." On Being (November 11, 2021) ["When Krista interviewed the psychiatrist and trauma specialist Bessel van der Kolk for the first time, his book The Body Keeps the Score was about to be published. She described him then as “an innovator in treating the effects of overwhelming experiences on people and society.” She catches up with him in 2021 — as we are living through one vast overwhelming experience after the other. And The Body Keeps the Score is now one of the most widely read books in the pandemic world. His perspective is utterly unique and very practically helpful — on what’s been happening in our bodies and our brains, and how that relationship can become severed and restored." Bessel van der Kolk is the founder and medical director of the Trauma Research Foundation in Brookline, Massachusetts. He’s also a professor of psychiatry at Boston University Medical School. His books include Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on the Mind, Body, and Society and The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma.]

Lee, Nathan. "Buried in the Mind: On The Shrouds, David Cronenberg’s Grief-Stricken Techno-Thriller." Notebook (April 18, 2025) ["In defense of The Shrouds (2024), the new film by David Cronenberg, I propose a moratorium on our fixation with “the body” when considering one of the great filmmakers of the mind. My intention is neither to be perverse nor provocative, qualities The Shrouds offers in abundance; nor to minimize that its plot centers on a technology that allows the bereaved to observe in real time the rotting corpses of buried loved ones. Bodies⎯alive and dead, material and imagined, actual and virtual, whole and dismembered⎯are indeed a central problem in The Shrouds, as they were in Crimes of the Future (2022). But just as that film’s tale of an ecological dystopia where the human body sprouts organs of unknown purpose was fundamentally concerned with how we assign meaning to the body, The Shrouds is an extended meditation on images of the body, including the body of the film we’re watching. "]

Marano, Mark.  "Melania - An Aggressively Dull Travesty."  The Arts Fuse (February 2, 2026)  ["All that I mention above, the aggressive lack of substance, underlines that Melania is an atrocious, badly made movie. Evil as they are, the Satanic cinematic genius of Triumph of the Will and Birth of a Nation can’t be denied. But those were works of propaganda, the propagation of which requires innovation, competence, and craft for the purpose of injecting their ideas into the minds of their audiences. Confirmaganda requires the opposite—utterly shitty, numbing filmmaking that doesn’t dominate through its presentation of ideas, but the removal of ideas. As O’Brien said in 1984: “Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”
The human minds welcoming Melania haven’t been torn apart in Room 101. The lasting achievement of Melania is that it reinforces your love of Melania—Big Mother—through generous doses of aggressive, assertively dull banality."]

McDouagall, James. "A Global History of Islam." Converging Dialogues #466 (January 19, 2026) ["In this episode, Xavier Bonilla has a dialogue with James McDougall about a global history of Islam. They discuss the global spread and diversity of Islam, Arabia before Muhammad, succession after Muhammad, the five pillars of Islam, emphasis on law and doctrine within Islam, Hadiths, the Ottoman Empire and spread of Islam, Islamists, Islam in the 21st century, and many more topics. James McDougall has taught history at Princeton; the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; and Oxford, where he is a Fellow of Trinity College. He is the author of numerous books including the most recent book, Worlds of Islam: A Global History."]

Nieman, Susan. "Where Wokeness Went Wrong." The New York Review of Books (December 4, 2025) ["Now that the war on wokeness has gone nuclear, waged with all the resources of an administration that views every struggle against racism, sexism, or homophobia as an affront, it is harder to discuss than ever. Is wokeness simply, as some argue, a phantom invented by conservatives opposed to any challenge to the established order?1 Like its predecessor “political correctness,” “wokeness” quickly became a term of abuse, complicating the already thorny attempts to define it. Attacks on “woke Marxist lunatics” betray so much ignorance that it’s tempting to give up analysis entirely. Yet analysis is needed, for criticisms of wokeness have come from across the political spectrum. Let’s start with what it is not. It isn’t cancel culture, which has been around since Plato banned Homer from his republic. That’s not an idea but a tactic that can be used by all sides—most drastically by the MAGA right in recent months. Nor is it dogmatic puritanism, which appears in many political movements. John McWhorter’s comparison of woke ness to fundamentalist religion is illuminating, but it doesn’t claim to be a definition. Wokeness is hard to define because it’s an incoherent concept, built on a contradiction between feeling and thought. It’s fueled by emotions traditionally held by the left. When in doubt, stand by those on the margins: the tired, the poor, the hungry, those yearning to breathe free. Those emotions, however, are undermined by beliefs that have traditionally belonged to the right. What are called identity politics—misleadingly, since they reduce our rich and various identities to our ethnic and gender origins—assume that you will have real connections and deep obligations only to those who belong to your own tribe, though others may be useful as allies. Calls for justice are sometimes viewed as liberal attempts to impose (Eurocentric) values on others; anyone who claims to be acting for the sake of a universal humanity is deceptive. Finally, apparent steps toward progress are simply subtler forms of oppression. Add to all of this the suspicion that reason is a form of domination that replaced more honest struggles for power, and you have a worldview that is not far from one held by the worst reactionaries. I am not arguing, as is commonly suggested, that wokeness was on the right track but went too far. Rather, by unwittingly accepting deeply regressive philosophical assumptions, it went in the wrong direction entirely."]

Robinson, Marilynne. "At What Cost?" The New York Review of Books (January 16, 2026): 15. ["Here is one final example of the cheapening of labor that demonstrates the readiness of the American population to be duped. This willingness is a tendency that must be taken into account if future abuses are to be forestalled. Some of us are old enough to remember when one income was sufficient to support a household. During that time the standard of living—measured in terms of homeownership, durable goods, access to higher education, and so on—rose sharply. Then the labor force grew dramatically, and it took two incomes, in some cases three or four jobs, to support a household. There is nothing more certain than that anything is cheapened when it is in surplus or when demand for it is weak. If two incomes have the same purchasing power as one, then both earners are working for some fraction of what would have been the single earner’s pay, corrected for inflation. Lives are harrowing and expensive because they have been entirely overtaken with work. There has been no adjustment of income to compensate for the expenses involved in childcare and transportation, among many other things. While it is true that the women’s movement, trying for equality, contributed very importantly to these changes, no kind of equity can justify absorbing a working woman’s earnings into the same level of income her household had before she made a financial contribution through her work. This by itself would have unbalanced the economy. It is a fundamental injustice affecting all those who live by their work, a cause of disappointment, weariness, bitterness. Yet their faith in the system is strong enough to let them limit their criticism to the high price of groceries rather than to the lowering valuation of their work, their health, and their time. AI fits entirely too well into this landscape. It seems perfectly designed to produce rapidly diminishing returns, at incalculable cost to society."]

Rovelli, Carlo. "Cosmic Mysteries and the Politic of Wonder." Wonder Cabinet (February 7, 2026) ["Carlo Rovelli’s quest to understand the nature of reality began not in a physics lab, but in youthful experiments with consciousness, political protest and a restless hunger for meaning—years before he “fell madly in love with physics.” Today, Rovelli is famous for his bestselling books, including "Seven Brief Lessons on Physics" and "Reality Is Not What It Seems," and his pioneering work on some of the biggest mysteries in physics, including black holes and quantum gravity. In a wide-ranging conversation, Steve Paulson talks with Rovelli about his early, profound experiences with LSD; his discovery of the "spectacular" beauty of general relativity and quantum mechanics; his lifelong search for purpose in both the cosmos and his own life; and why scientists need to be politically engaged. Carlo also tells us about the big idea that he’d put in our own wonder cabinet. This interview was recorded at the Island of Knowledge think tank in Tuscany, a project supported by Dartmouth College and the John Templeton Foundation. We also play a short excerpt from Anne Strainchamps’ earlier interview with Rovelli that originally aired on Wisconsin Public Radio’s To The Best Of Our Knowledge."]

Rushton, Michael. "The Moral Foundations of Public Funding for the Arts (Palgrave Macmillan 2023)." New Books in Critical Theory (November 25, 2023) ["Should governments fund the arts? In The Moral Foundations of Public Funding for the Arts (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023), Michael RushtonCo-Director of the Center for Cultural Affairs and a Professor at the O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University, explores a variety of frameworks for thinking about this question, from liberal and egalitarian justifications, through to communitarian, conservative, and multiculturalist ideas. The book outlines the economic method for thinking about the arts, and uses this as a starting point to understand what various political philosophies might tell policymakers and the public today. A rich and deep intervention on a pressing social and governmental question, the book is essential reading across the arts, humanities, and social sciences, as well as for anyone interested in arts and cultural policy. Prof Rushton blogs at both Substack and Artsjournal and you can read open access papers covering some of the key ideas in the book here and here."]

Sagar, Paul. "What’s Wrong with Political Philosophy? Learning from Aristotle." Past Present Future (February 1, 2026) ["Today it’s the first episode in a new series asking why contemporary political philosophy struggles to make sense of the deepest problems of politics and exploring how the history of ideas might help. David talks to political theorist Paul Sagar about why looking for justice might be the wrong place to start. Instead, Paul suggests we start with Aristotle, for whom the search for justice was the problem not the solution. So what should we do instead?"]

Schmalzer, Sigrid and Charles Schwarz. "Science Against the People." Darts and Letters #68 (November 14, 2022) ["Today, right-wingers attack science and liberals defend it. Science good, anti-science Republicans bad–that’s the prevailing narrative, especially so during the March for Science in 2017. However, it’s not so simple. Perhaps science should be defended from reactionary attacks, but not uncritically defended as inherently good. That’s the message of Science for the People,a radical movement of scientists and educators who argue that science has always served capitalism, patriarchy, and empire. So, science doesn’t need to be simply defended–it needs to change. We examine the group’s Vietnam-era origins, with the story of one of its founders, physicist Charles Schwartz. Schwartz’ work initially supported the US war effort, but he became a thorn in the side of the military and scientific establishment for over two decades. However, in the 1980s Science for the People went dormant. Since the mid-2010s, it’s back. We then speak to a current member, and also the historian who brought them back together. Sigrid Schmalzer is co-editor of a collection of the group’s writing, entitled Science for the People: Documents from America’s Movement of Radical Scientists, 1969-1989. We cover how the group came back together, how this incarnation is different, and how they traverse the complicated politics between pro-science liberals and anti-science reactionaries."]

Seth, Anil. "How we build perception from the inside out." Psyche (January 16, 2026) ["It’s easy to mistake our conscious experience for an ongoing, accurate account of reality. After all, the information we recover from our senses is, of course, the only window we’ll ever have into the outside world. And for most people most of the time, our perception certainly feels real. But the notion that our senses capture an objective external reality can be dispelled by considering something as fundamental as colour, which can be culturally influenced and, even within a single culture, leave the population split between seeing the same picture of a dress as black and blue or white and gold. In this Aeon Original, Anil Seth, professor of cognitive and computational neuroscience at the University of Sussex in the UK, puts our imperfect relationship with reality in perspective. In conversation with Nigel Warburton, consultant senior editor at Aeon, Seth argues that it’s not just that our perceptions provide flawed accounts of the outside world, but that our brains aren’t in the business of recovering the outside world to begin with. So it’s more accurate to think of our conscious experience as a series of predictions that we’re incessantly and subconsciously fine-tuning – a world we build from the inside out, rather than the outside in."]

Sheldrake, Merlin. Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds & Shape Our Futures. Random House, 2020. ["A mind-bending journey into the hidden world of fungi that will change your understanding of life on earth. "A dazzling, vibrant, vision-changing book . . . I ended it wonderstruck at the fungal world--the secrets of which modern science is only now beginning to fathom."--Robert Macfarlane, author of Underland. When we think of fungi, we likely think of mushrooms. But mushrooms are only fruiting bodies, analogous to apples on a tree. Most fungi live out of sight, yet make up a massively diverse kingdom of organisms that supports and sustains nearly all living systems. Fungi provide a key to understanding the planet on which we live, and the ways we think, feel, and behave. In Entangled Life, the brilliant young biologist Merlin Sheldrake shows us the world from a fungal point of view, providing an exhilarating change of perspective. Sheldrake's vivid exploration takes us from yeast to psychedelics, to the fungi that range for miles underground and are the largest organisms on the planet, to those that link plants together in complex networks known as the "Wood Wide Web," to those that infiltrate and manipulate insect bodies with devastating precision. Fungi throw our concepts of individuality and even intelligence into question. They are metabolic masters, earth makers, and key players in most of life's processes. They can change our minds, heal our bodies, and even help us remediate environmental disaster. By examining fungi on their own terms, Sheldrake reveals how these extraordinary organisms--and our relationships with them--are changing our understanding of how life works."]

Strand, Sophie. "Ecological Storytelling and Mythic Imagination." Wonder Cabinet (January 31, 2026) ["Writer and ecologist Sophie Strand thinks at a scale that can feel dizzying—in the best way. In a single conversation, she can move from the chemical structure of cells to mushroom spores, from ancient weather gods to mycorrhizal fungi, from Bronze Age collapse to the slow intelligence of soil. In this episode of Wonder Cabinet, we talk with Strand about wonder that doesn’t float upward but roots downward—into bodies, ecosystems, decay, and deep time. We begin with her essay “Your Body Is an Ancestor,” published shortly before Halloween and the Day of the Dead, and follow her imagery into our shared prehistoric past. The conversation also explores how Strand’s experience of chronic illness reshaped her understanding of nature, selfhood, and health. Rather than seeing the sick body as broken, she turns to ecological metaphors: spider webs, soil structures, caterpillars dissolving inside cocoons. What might it mean to understand ourselves not as machines that fail, but as landscapes that change? Along the way, we talk about fantasy and “romantasy,” Tolkien, Harry Potter, Dramione fan fiction and communal storytelling rituals. This is a conversation about wonder with dirt under its fingernails: embodied, mythic, ecological, and deeply alive to the cycles of death and regeneration that bind us all."]

Turfah, Mary. "The Most Moral Army." Los Angeles Review of Books (October 1, 2024) ["Mary Turfah examines Israeli officials’ weaponization of language, particularly that of medicine, in an attempt to reframe their genocide in Gaza."]

---. "No Other Land for Whom?" The Notebook (February 11, 2025)  ["The documentary captures how ethnic cleansing serves the Zionist state-building project. The Palestinians of Masafer Yatta lack building permits, and so their Israeli overseers are legally—and, in a state shaped to suit the eyes of a vindictive god, morally—obligated to lay down the law, to destroy everything. In No Other Land we see that for the Palestinian to have “no permit” means the Israeli has license to fill water wells with cement, to clumsily take military-grade hedge-clippers to water pipes, bulldozer to schoolhouse, gun to Palestinian. And we see the mundanity of these exercises of state power: soldiers shuffling off to carry out orders, almost bored by their tasks. "]



No comments:

Post a Comment